Greens Take Wrecking Balls To Nature
Greens say they love trees. However their policies destroy ridge-line forests to make room for subsidised bird-chopping wind turbines with their clear-felled spider-webs of roads and transmission lines.
They also encourage fierce forest firestorms by preventing the protective patchwork of the many small fires once lit by aboriginals and pastoralists. We have a choice – many small fires or a few huge wildfires. Greens have also forced foresters out of the forests, thus removing their practical forest conservation.
Green agendas have also resulted in clearing forests to feed distant power stations with “green” wood pellets and to make room for biofuel plantations.
The solar panels they subsidise are smothering grasslands and farms with landscapes of sun-stealing plastic shades (made in China). And where they use mirrors to focus solar heat, birds get roasted on the wing.
Not content with destroying forests and farmland with the plastic, steel and concrete clutter of the green energy twins, turbines and panels are now wearing out and loading landfills with un-degradable plastic waste. Not green at all.
Once Australia had cheap reliable electricity powered by coal and hydro but Green Wrecking Balls are destroying coal power in favour of those unreliable and intermittent energy twins – wind and solar. This has made electricity expensive and unreliable, with zero measurable benefit for the climate.
After their destructive war on coal, the Green Wrecking Balls are now taking aim at cattle.
Green Wreckers are also destroying Australia’s water security and flood mitigation by opposing new dams and weirs and by wasting stored water on “environmental flows”. Droughts and floods will come again.
More Green Wrecking Balls have shredded the reputations of once-trusted organisations like CSIRO, ABC and most Universities.
And they green-wash our kids at every opportunity. People increasingly doubt the constant dirge of Climate Alarmism from these Green Cuckoos bred in their cosy taxpayer-funded nests.
Finally, Green Educators have corroded standards in maths, science and engineering, replacing hard data and analysis with manipulated models and green fables.
There is a green agenda, but it’s more about world government than about the environment.
Claiming to save the world from the global warming ghosts, climate alarmists are smashing our future with Green Wrecking Balls.
Header image: Adobe Stock
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Alan
| #
Well said Viv. Simple, fact-based statements to reveal the nonsense being imposed on us.
What puzzles me is why “scientists” are lying about a climate emergency and why it is so readily accepted, especially by the media and politicians. I’m not inclined to believe in conspiracy theories about a great reset. It probably confirms what Einstein said – human stupidity is infinite.
Reply
Howdy
| #
The great reset is no conspiracy theory Alan, It’s a cult of lunatics.
https://greatreset.com/
Reply
sir_isO
| #
Sorry bub, there’s no reset.
They want a reset to perpetuate their failings. Impending doom for all things.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Alan and PSI Readers,
Alan, you make good comments to focus other PSI Readers upon VALID POINTS which need emphasis. However, you often do not follow up. Recently you asked a question to do this and I gave my answer for you to consider. But you did not respond as to my answer.
Galileo’s famous book used Dialogues (conversations) to help us to discover possible answers within ourselves.
Two of his quotes (as translated to English by someone) are: “We cannot teach people anything; we can only help them discover it within themselves.” and “I have never met a man so ignorant that I couldn’t learn something from him.”
Have a good day, Jerry
Reply
itsme
| #
Goody two-shoe ‘scientists’ get grants if the do what big business wants them to do – so that big business can make more money from tax paying middle classes, forced to cough out their hard earned dosh to billionaires.
Reply
Judith Day
| #
Well said from me also, Viv. In order to erect a 37 turbine wind farm and infrastructure near me, nearly 4000 acres of forest were destroyed.
Reply
Howdy
| #
See Elon Musk. He’s good at removing these overgrown forests in the name of saving the planet. Likes people that dig deep holes for chemicals too. What a guy!!
Reply
sir_isO
| #
He’s a DoE/DoD front.
You “oil” purveyors are no better. Saturn invades your mind now.
Reply
Klondike
| #
Frank, Commenters like you distroy the good name of principia scientific with your ever flowing dribble!
Reply
Howdy
| #
For your information osiris, Saturn is my “friend”, just like Pluto. Very valuable teachers in life.
Reply
sir_isO
| #
Hey, you convince someone to believe a lie, it’s far more difficult to explain to them they’ve been lied to.
Saturn is NOT your friend.
That was your choice, btw.
https://stonedgod.bandcamp.com/album/discordant-divinity
Reply
sir_isO
| #
Pluto is something I’ve been keeping alive, btw.
So that you can know death.
Reply
Howdy
| #
I don’t listen to trash music. I’ll get my information from elsewhere.
Both Saturn, and Pluto are far deeper, and carry much greater significance than you claim. And as you’ve shown many times, you belong to Hades. I do not.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi PSI Readers,
NOAA’s “U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN) is a systematic and sustained network of climate monitoring stations with sites across the conterminous U.S., Alaska, and Hawaii. These stations use high-quality instruments to measure temperature, precipitation, wind speed, soil conditions, and more. Information is available on what is measured and the USCRN station instruments.” (https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/crn/)
“wind speed”; except when one goes toe the USCRN data sets there are no wind speed reported. The problem was (and is) that the NOAA designers of these stations placed the wind instruments at the same distance (about 1.meters) above the earth’s surface as the air temperature was being measured instead of the common ‘altitude of 10 meters.
Then they quickly discovered that the wind speed and direction at 1.5m was MUCH more variable than these factors measured at 10m for obvious reasons which was why wind speed had been commonly measured at 10m for a long time to avoid the influence of the surface upon the wind nearer to the surface.
Except, I believe the NOAA SCIENTISTS ignore the common observation that daytime winds measured at 10m are significantly greater than nighttime winds. I suspect, but I do not know because the data sets do not report the nighttime winds, the nighttime winds would be slight, but measurable, without any extreme gusts. Etc. USE your IMAGINATION to SEE that which I am trying to focus your attention upon.
Relative to the difference of the potential WIND’S ENERGY during the DAYTIME versus the NIGHTTIME, one needs to consider the data of the RAWS, Remote Automated Weather Station. (https://raws.dri.edu)
Have a good day, Jerry
Reply