G20 Countries Now Require Vaccine Passports To Allow international travel
Just when you thought this freaking war on COVID unvaxxinated had ended, G20 leaders have just quietly signed a declaration which states that vaccine passports will be adopted to “facilitate” all international travel
This means any vaccination the WHO determines you should have. Changing your rights & freedoms forever.
And of course silence from the media…
Here’s the whole G20 Bali Leaders’ Declaration if you want to read it…
The paragraph related to this article can be found under Point 23.
When things get bad you won’t be able to escape.
This is very true if you know that globalists Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates were also present at the G20 in Indonesia…
The bottom line is, if you are unvaccinated against anything the World Health Organisation deems neccessary, YOU WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO LEAVE YOUR COUNTRY.
See more here strangesounds
Header image: Getty Images
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Tom
| #
More steps toward world control of every human. Never traveling internationally.
Reply
Carbon Bigfoot
| #
This nonsense is about to end:
https://bestnewshere.com/derek-johnson-special-all-the-military-optics-in-donald-trumps-nov-15th-speech/
Optics & Comms.
Passion personified. Scroll to 11:25.
What we all need to do. A Grunt with the Truth for all you 98%ers that don’t understand LAW of the Republic—and the MILITARY LAW.
This will end this nonsense the SHTF.
Reply
aaron
| #
lol, yes trump will save us
Reply
Howdy
| #
Thanks C.B. While I’m not of the US, I do have an interest. Proper video.
Reply
Len Winokur
| #
Let’s not also forget the COMMON LAW https://www.commonlawcourt.com/
Reply
Carbon Bigfoot
| #
Common Law DOES NOT APPLY under Marshall Law. If you did some research instead of siting irrelevant nonsense you’d know that. In the USA we have been under Martial Law since 12/20—Military Law. Do some reading instead of mouthing off like the fool you exhibit.
Reply
val
| #
Presumably, the rest of the 188 countries are smart enough NOT to do so and don’t support the control narrative based on false ‘science’ and systemic corruption. In addition, the G20 are ignoring statements from injection manufacturers that the injections are NOT ‘vaccines’ but gene therapy, and the realities that these injections are killing people.
Reply
Roo63
| #
So, we don’t go abroad, but they’ve got their private jets and won’t be having the same injections as civilians, anyway and we all know that they won’t be stopping at this, don’t we.
Those Psychopathic Parasites need rounding up for trial “yesterday”, for Treason at the very least, but who by? The Traitors on their payroll, who turn a blind eye to protect the scum?
Just more information to Not to be written in the future history books, their Psycho-buddies will Never write, for our doomed offspring.
No, I am not giving in. Screw the lot of them. We just never travel abroad 🙂
Reply
Rustic
| #
It won’t stop at international travel. Domestic travel will follow, then access to grocery stores and other essentials providers. Then it will be locked bank accounts and internment camps.
Reply
Andy Rowlands
| #
More than likely I would say.
Reply
Wilson Sy
| #
Travelling to and from country A and B is a matter between those two countries. So long as travellers are free from any infectious diseases of concerned to those two countries, the WHO can butt out of meddling.
Vaccination certificates of diseases irrelevant to those countries are completely pointless. For example, travel between two African countries without coronavirus infections, COVID vaccinations are unnecessary and irrelevant.
Global bureaucracy is running rampant and G20 leaders are not serving the interest of their own peoples.
Reply
Robert Beatty
| #
20 members in the G20 group of countries include: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, South Korea, Japan, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Turkey, the United Kingdom, the United States, and the European Union. None of these countries could be described as being subject to direct democracy – which leads to this autocratic style of leadership, otherwise described as Top-Down government.
I cannot see any peaceful way this can be changed to a Bottom-Up form of government without embedding CIR into their individual constitutions. My book suggestion for Australia is at https://bosmin.com/ICS/CIR-Australia.pdf
Is anyone interested in composing a draft for a CIR-countryX book?
Reply
MattH
| #
Hi Bob. Citizen Initiated Referenda is best spelt out. I had no idea what CIR was so lost interest. Do not bury the key issue or I will put you in a headlock and bowl underarm at you.
I hope you have a sense of humour.
Reply
Robert Beatty
| #
Thanks for the feedback MattH,
The point of not spelling CIR out is to persuade the curious to check the web reference out. That seems to work!
One of the important marketing aspects is to include “we actively support CIR” on all political advertising material. In that way, the political representatives get to answer the question to unknown individuals – and eventually to attract significant political support. That is one of the few ways a minor political party (or a waning major political party) can become a political force to be reckoned with. Getting political recognition is an effective way to get the entrenched elite parties to seriously consider the CIR options, because they will have to loosen their grip on the levers of power. Horror!
Reply
MattH
| #
Hi Bob.
An informed community can make informed decisions. If the decision is an amalgam of a community’s ideas the outcome can be model.
I have some personal experience with award winning community consultation processes although others have since claimed ownership of them and destroyed them.
With a facilitated process the key is in designing the process to positively accommodate all ideas, including ‘dumb’ ideas.
Politicians hire consultants where a community will give most of the answers for free plus when it is the community’s sandcastle design you have 90% plus by in.
Of course. technical advice is still necessary, but the best ideas are given freely.
The most important two words are ‘cumulative effect’. Cumulative effect deals to unintended consequences.
I would consider putting some of the key necessities of a process for model outcomes in writing next year or when inclined.
First thing, Bob, is use the term Citizen Initiated Referenda rather than CIR so people immediately have their imaginations and creativity unleashed and the art of listening can begin, listening for community wants, needs, and aspirations.
You and I have differed over the use of the term CIR which is where both ideas are listed with pros and cons for each idea so one can tease out an amalgam and evolution on when to use either term to create a near perfect model where we are both right and have buy in.
Same as a “dumb” idea. Usually something useful can be teased out of a dumb idea so the proponent takes ownership of the outcome because a part of him is included. Planning can be boring. Gotta go.
I am discussing the preliminary work required before a CIR because desired outcomes usually require many minor initiatives rather than one big unintended consequence. Evolution, not change.
Reply
Robert Beatty
| #
Hi MattH,
Thanks for these comments. It seems you are giving the issue some serious thought – which is well justified. Feel free to contact me personally.
MattH
| #
Hi Bob.
My work on democratic processes was 20 years ago.
I have had time to consider improvements and how to overcome difficulties.
The ongoing farce is usually as a result of power and control and, yes, compromising due process in an attempt at financial gain.
I have been thinking I need to write a brief article for local publication in the next year.
I have some essentials to complete this year but am mindful of some potential contributions to your work.
If you had a glossary in your book,’ cumulative effect-to perceive unintended consequences.’
Listening would require a number of interpretations. Asking questions is one.
I see Wilson Sy (below) is giving me credit for your work. (chuckle chuckle) And he cleared up our debate.(first line)
I will be in touch down the line. ( Inshallah, God willing)
Cheers Matt
Wilson Sy
| #
Agree with MattH: Citizen Initiated Referendum (CIR) is such an obvious necessity for democracy that it is self-explanatory. I’m not surprised that there is a copious history about it. Every good idea seems to have been corrupted and made useless. Would the Swiss model work in other countries? One referendum I like to see is: do we have the collective will to prevent our sovereign government ceding responsibility and power to un-elected global institutions (regulators): BIS, WHO, etc. which are tyrants answerable to nobody.
Reply
Auntie Vaxina
| #
What will the bureaucrats do when all of the vaccinated die off? Pilots are dropping dead mid-flight, would you really want to travel knowing that?
Reply