Former Pfizer Vice President Admits Virus Science is ‘Bullshit’
Former Pfizer VP Michael Yeadon claims that viruses and person-to-person contagion do not exist, calling both concepts lies used to justify vaccines.
In the interview, he argues that injections bypass the body’s natural defenses and suggests historical medicine falsely promoted contagion narratives.
He also claims there is no historical evidence of contagion in ancient writings and describes vaccines as built on what he sees as false assumptions about viruses and disease transmission.
Former Pfizer VP and allergy & respiratory disease expert Michael Yeadon:
“We haven’t got the sub-microscopic infectious particles called viruses. That’s bullshit”.
“We don’t have contagion of a sick person to a well person. That’s bullshit”“Virus lie plus contagion lie equals vaccine lie”
“A friend of mine pointed out that in 6,000 years of writing of every culture on the planet, you will find no mention of contagion. No mention of contagion… Funny, you would think they would have noticed that”
This clip of Yeadon, a former Pfizer Vice President and expert in allergies and respiratory diseases, is taken from an interview with James Delingpole posted to the Delingpod Rumble channel on April 27, 2026. Full Video
Partial transcription of clip
“Contagion does not happen. So if you choose to believe me, if your mission is to decide for yourself, we haven’t got the sub-microscopic infectious particles called viruses. That’s bullshit. We don’t have contagion of a sick person to a well person. That’s bullshit as well.
“But you need both of those lies, don’t you, in order that vaccines make any sense. But they’re both false. And if any one of them is false, you’re being lied to. They’re both false. You’re being lied to.
“Why is it diabolical magic? Why is this so important? Two things to tell you. One is why it’s so important. And you’ll— I reeled over with horror when I sussed it, and I hope you will too. And then I’m going to remind you something very peculiar happens with people who don’t go along with this nonsense. And it happens nowhere else in your professional existence, which I think ties in with what I’m about to tell you.
“So it’s the only thing you routinely do now where you get a hollow metal needle and you jab it into a human being. And then you close the plunger on the syringe and whatever is in that syringe ends up inside your body. It’s got through all your defenses in one go.
“Remember I told you your skin is really brilliant? Your skin is an incredible— It’s like three different layers stratified outside layer. Then you’ve got the dermis and the epidermis and so on, and then small blood vessels underneath that will weep if you cut yourself and throw defenses to keep you clean from the outside invasions from the outside world.
“Your skin’s brilliant. It’s a huge organ. And then, your lungs have got this lining of sticky stuff that wafts out, keeps you safe. And then your stomach, as I say, it sterilizes whatever you eat. God and nature have given you an incredibly well defended fortress and you occupy that space for your life. But if you can jab a hollow needle, you go bypass your digestive system, you bypass your breathing, you bypass your skin’s mighty defenses and you can inject whatever the hell you like into a human being.
“So that’s why they chose the injection. And that’s— And I think you need this diabolical lie of stupid, inventive viruses and understandable, but not through contagion. A friend of mine pointed out that in 6,000 years of writing of every culture on the planet, you will find no mention of contagion. No mention of contagion. Interestingly, funny, you would think they would have noticed that long before we— Whatever.
“I’m not sure, but I think [the contagion narrative] probably was going to be like 1700-1800. I think the people that started scarifying, which was to cut repeatedly the skin and then shove cowpox pus into people. That Jenner experiment, you know, that— It’s all, it’s another lie.
“You know, the heroic theorists, the heroic figures of science and medicine, I’m afraid, they’re mostly made up, just like the heroic figures of literature are probably. Mostly. But I just want to tell you one. So that’s the lie. Viruses, contagion, and vaccines. And I write it down as a mathematical equation. Virus lie plus contagion lie equals vaccine lie.”
source lionessofjudah.substack.com
Tom
| #
All of big pharma is bullshyt.
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
The article regarding Dr. Michael Yeadon is interesting, not because Dr. Yeadon has suddenly changed his position, but because his conclusions appear to move toward a position I reached and openly discussed from the very beginning of the COVID narrative.
My position was never based on politics, ideology, or emotion. It came purely from a scientific perspective — specifically chemistry and analytical science. When I examined the claims surrounding viruses, isolation, testing, and characterization at the very beginning, I immediately recognized that the story did not meet the standards of foundational science. I said so publicly from the start (https://bioanalyticx.com/93/, https://bioanalyticx.com/the-science-behind-covid-and-vaccines-2/).
However, instead of addressing the scientific concerns themselves, many became upset that I was criticizing subjects such as virology and medical science, fields in which I had not formally worked. Yet my criticism was never about clinical practice or biology as observational disciplines. My criticism was that these fields were making scientific and chemical claims that they could not properly support according to established scientific standards.
Claims regarding isolation, purification, characterization, validation, specificity, and detection belong fundamentally to chemistry and analytical science. These are not matters of opinion, institutional authority, or majority consensus. They require physically defined entities, validated reference standards, calibrated methods, and reproducible measurements.
Now, apparently, Dr. Yeadon has also arrived at the conclusion that much of the virus narrative is “BS.” Whether one agrees with his wording or not, the growing skepticism reflects a deeper and more fundamental problem.
In my view, the issue going forward is not merely COVID or viruses. The real issue is the widespread confusion between biology and science itself.
Biology — including virology and much of medical science — should be recognized for what it largely is: descriptive, observational, model-based, interpretive, and assumption-driven. That does not make it worthless. However, it is fundamentally different from foundational sciences such as chemistry, physics, and mathematics, where claims must be tied to physically defined and experimentally validated entities.
The problem begins when biology and medicine present assumptions, interpretations, or indirect observations as if they were scientifically established facts in the same sense used in chemistry or physics.
Neither virology nor medical practice should be allowed to claim scientific proof of isolation, purification, characterization, or detection of substances unless those claims meet the actual standards required in analytical chemistry and foundational science. Using scientific language, instruments, or technical complexity does not automatically make a field scientifically rigorous.
Science does not become valid through repetition, institutional agreement, expert status, peer-reviewing, or public acceptance. It becomes valid only when claims are experimentally demonstrated, measurable, reproducible, and scientifically verifiable according to foundational scientific standards – in this case, chemistry.
Reply
tiborbarna
| #
In which case what caused all the plagues throughout past history?
Reply
tiborbarna
| #
What caused all the plagues throughout past history?
Reply
Len Winokur
| #
The below videos may provide some insights.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=np2DhNSHbRc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8Bxa5F2jAU
Reply
Seriously
| #
Living conditions.
Up until the 1900’s our cities lived in their own created, excreted filth (sewage), combined with poor nutrition availability -no such thing as a supermarket or sanitary food supplies. Florence Nightingale proved her hypothesis in the treatment of wounded soldiers and ‘cleanliness is next to godliness ‘was born. It was common to live close to slaughter animals as well.
Reply
Watching the World
| #
Big Pharma has such good PR that even though Yeadon admits all this, vaccine fanatics will say he’s lying. Even if you could prove it, they won’t believe you…. The propaganda is astounding.
Reply