Five Nobel Prizes No One Seems Capable of Winning

Written by Karma Singh on February 11, 2021. Posted in Current News

Nobel prizes, especially in medicine, physics and chemistry, are usually won by many years of painstaking research. Sometimes, however, they are won because somebody noticed something that all of the “specialists” completely overlooked. This can give the great insights which lead to the awarding of Nobel prizes.

For around one hundred years, recipients for a number of Nobel prizes have been sought. Each year, the Nobel Committee at the Swedish Academy of Sciences scours the literature to see whether anyone has made the long-sought breakthrough. So far, without avail.

Most of us, myself included, were taught in school that viruses are tiny protein packages which are unable to self-replicate. They increase their numbers by attaching themselves to the walls of our cells with a special “hook” and then invade our cells. Once inside, they compel our cells to replicate them until the cell is destroyed at which point they burst out and invade thousands of other cells in the same manner.

The problem that science has with this is that it is all conjecture and assumption. To date, no-one has been able to present the evidence to prove any of this. This is why the Swedish Academy searches the literature for this each and every year.

The first prize:

Is for the proof that viruses exist. This may seem like an oxymoron, I mean – we’ve all seen photos of viruses, haven’t we? Well, no. You see, saying that something is a virus and proving that it is, is not the same thing at all. This same question was put to Germany’s highest court and, in December 2016, the judges ruled that the evidence presented did NOT prove the existence of the measles virus. To date, no additional evidence has been offered.

With anything so small as the postulated viruses, the biggest problem is that you can’t see them with an optical microscope – they’re just too small. The electron microscopes, which were designed and built to study metals and other minerals, can show things that small but, the preparation destroys any organic material and all that can be seen in the photo is the toxic heavy metals which have destroyed and replaced the original (presumably) organic material during the preparation process.

We must also note that the concentrated electron beam used by such microscopes will completely destroy any living protein.

It seems that a completely new technological concept in microscopy is needed. One which is capable of observing living material at a magnification some thousands of times greater than any modern optical microscope. Such an invention did exist, created by Gaston Naessens in Canada. In nearly 40 years of use, he never found a virus. His machine, called the “Somatoscope”, was disassembled following his death and his widow has, unfortunately, decided not to co-operate with anyone trying to re-create it.

Prize number 2:

Is for finding the “hook” and proving that viruses attach themselves to a cell with it and then push themselves through the cell walls and hijack the genetic machine inside.

The present status is that there is no evidence whatsoever to substantiate any of this. It is a completely imaginary process and, so it seems to me, requires the same breakthrough in microscopy  as for Prize 1 before it can be proven or disproven.

There is a further problem in that, due to the highly destructive and deadly nature of the electron microscope, there is no picture of what the walls of a cell look like. There are, at present, 17 different hypotheses but, in the face of total lack of evidence, you can either choose one of the 17 at random or create your own hypothesis.

Prize number 3:

Is, therefore, for identifying the structure of cell walls.

Prize number 4:

Is for demonstrating not only that a virus kidnaps the genetic replication machine in cells but also exactly how it does this. As with prize number 2, this is, at present, pure speculation and imagination with no supporting evidence whatsoever.

Prize number 5:

Is for showing not only that but also exactly how the activities of viruses destroy cells. Such proof, of course, must include proof that the viruses cloned by the process sought for Prize number 2, not only attack other cells but exactly how the “attacked” cell is chosen.

Advances in Quantum Biophysics during the last three decades as well as the, present, accelerated attempts to replicate the work of Gaston Naessens could, in the near future, show that all of the “virus” hypotheses are nothing more than guesswork and wishful thinking (as the judges in Germany decided in 2016). So, if you want one of these Nobel Prizes, you’ve got to move fast.

Best of luck with your project.

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.

Trackback from your site.