FDA Invokes ‘Sovereign Immunity’ for Misleading Ivermectin Statements
This Substack has chronicled the illegal war on PSYOP-19 early treatment therapies by the very perpetrators of the “pandemic,” and their associated criminal mandates
It is no surprise that the most vilified early treatment repurposed drug Ivermectin has also been by far the most effective:
PetMectin: Pharmaceutical Grade Pure Ivermectin
The reason that the captured FDA along with their partners-in-crime the CDC, WHO, UN, WEF, CFR, DoD, Pentagon, CIA, the illegitimate Federal government, Rockefeller and Gates “nonprofits,” et al. have targeted Ivermectin is threefold:
it is exceptionally effective as an early C-19 treatment,
mass administration would have resulted in plummeting global (turbo) cancer rates,
and this wonder drug attenuates and reverses the slow kill bioweapon DEATHVAX™ damage.
A landmark lawsuit filed against the FDA by doctors Mary Talley Bowden, Paul Marik, and Robert Apter was heard in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals yesterday. Part of this lawsuit against the FDA was specific to fraudulent and illicit claims made by the agency against Ivermectin.
Basically, the FDA lawyer is now making mendacious claims that it did not prevent doctors from prescribing off-label Ivermectin, and yet they put tremendous pressure on the entire medical establishment and pharmacists to under no circumstances prescribe this drug.
The FDA even tweeted their bizarrely-worded propaganda to put further pressure on doctors, illegally subverted with the Hippocratic Oath in plain sight, and were harming those they claim to protect with their social media posts:
After decades of committing various fraud on behalf of their BigPharma owners, the FDA’s true reason for existing was fully revealed during PSYOP-19. And now the FDA’s lawyer is most conveniently invoking ‘Sovereign Immunity:’
If the FDA is legally (under color of law, and certainly not constitutionally) granted the right to offer general, more at sweeping, medical advice, then how would that not interfere with the doctor patient relationship?
In other words, there is no room for an unconstitutional Federal government agency to meddle in the intimate and individualized practice of doctoring.
Of course, the FDA always knew that it’s statements were outright lies. Lies, mind you, that cost lives; in fact, the FDA’s guidance was in no small part the actual driver of the “pandemic” in democidal hospital protocols, murderous nursing home policies, and subversion of early treatments like Ivermectin.
The statements were anything but partially misleading. They deliberately lied in order to push the wholly unsafe and grossly ineffective slow kill bioweapon injections on behalf of their One World Government handlers.
But it gets worse, way worse:
The FDA lawyer was absolutely lying about the political process in order to cover up the their initial messaging crimes: Ask yourself, what kind of “political process” resulted in the following?:
With this latest lawsuit, the FDA has now been completely exposed and implicated in actual crimes.
The Mockingbird MSM will obviously dare not touch this vitally important story.
Because there can never be immunity for Crimes Against Humanity.
Now that “vaccine” uptake is collapsing, with the bivalent poison booster uptake at around 17 percent, the last big moneymaker for BigPharma is cancer. And the FDA will do everything in its power to prevent exceedingly effective and inexpensive repurposed drugs from being deployed against any and all diseases, not limited to their upcoming PSYOP-24 “X-pandemic.”
Which is precisely why you need to familiarize yourselves with the following article:
Do NOT comply.
See more here 2ndsmartestguyintheworld
Header image: The Conversation
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About Covid 19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Wisenox
| #
Still trying to make Ivermectin into something it isn’t. They’ve been attempting to get people to fight for it for 3 years, and that’s a red flag.
Covid’s fake, you don’t need anything. Additionally, Ivermectin only purports to help alleviate risk. Asymptomatic fake covid has a 99.5% survival rate, so idiots using Ivermectin are mitigating a whopping 0.4-0.5% risk, while taking on whatever characteristics Ivermectin really does to them.
One of their favorite tricks is to attack the things and people they want you to fall for. South Park even described it in one of their internet trolling episodes. They do it with politicians frequently. By making the fake attack, a subconscious “choice” is presented to the mindless sheep, who invariably pick a side. This is irregardless of any analysis or rational thought, just simply making the choice that was presented to them.
They’re doing the same thing with Ivermectin. They constantly attack this garbage medicine so that sheep will fight to have it. No one ever cares about Ivermectin stories, but they’re still pushed as if its a hot topic.
Reply
Carbon Bigfoot
| #
https://rumble.com/v1owcgh-parasites-a-new-paradigm.html?mref=8nn9r&mc=3nyri
In 2021 I contracted seriously life threatening pneumonia ( never jabbed since I survived the pathogen in 2020 ).
I was prescribed prednisone and an antibiotic. I did not improve until I self-administered Invective that I got at a local Tack Shop. A three day cure. Shortly thereafter I acquired a 6mg supply for future parasitic elimination. If you have pets you have parasites.
You might want to consider researching your position before offering your opinion.
. .
Reply
Wisenox
| #
Not sure why you were ill, but I bet you could’ve avoided it by protecting yourself from your environment. Hardly any of us do.
I compiled a short pdf including research from 47 studies. They were all in EMF, Aluminum and Glysophates.
I came up with an all natural regimen, and its a difference you can feel.
Citicoline 250-500mg/1 or 2x/dy
Vitamin D3 50,000iu/wk
Super Oxide Dismutase mornings
Catalase 10,000iu afternoons
Bodybuilding vitamin 1/2 morning 1/2 evening
L-acetyl-carnitine afternoons
Vitamin C mornings
Diatomaceous Earth or 2um pore size Zeolites daily first 30 days. Zeolites shouldn’t be repeated too early, but diatomaceous earth (1 tbsp) can be taken daily.
This odd collection actually addresses many of the bad effects from common environmental sources. If you’d like to know why any item is on the list, I’d be happy to tell you.
I have been using this for a few years. My eye prescriptions have nearly stopped sliding altogether, more alert, never sick, more productive and a bunch of other effects.
If you try it, you will probably feel the difference. You may find yourself saying “damn, my eyesight is clear today”, or “my brain feels like its on fire”, meaning you feel capable mentally.
That last one is probably because we’re replacing ACh co-factors and introducing a neurotransmitter analog with citicoline. Helps depolarize the synapses a little. Important, due to the amount of ion channel loading our environment causes.
Reply
Carbon Bigfoot
| #
I offered a new Paradigm but you went into a defensive position of offering medical advice.which I didn’t ask for. Don’t feel bad no one else viewed what I consider STUNNING SCIENTIFIC THEORY.
You like Jerry Krause went off on a tangent overlooking what I consider impressive science from my MEDICAL REBEL. .
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
Thanks Wisenox for your comment.
@ “Covid’s fake, you don’t need anything.” Agreed, I wrote an article on this aspect almost a year and a half ago. (https://bioanalyticx.com/ivermectin-and-covid-19-controversy-why/).
The debate or promotion is not about ivermectin but promoting and selling expertise so that experts (including at FDA) gain their lost trust and expertise. Unfortunately, it may be too late. Some are promoting ivermectin; others are different ones, including so-called anti-virals.
It is not about science or health but about covering up the lies of many decades, particularly the past three years.
The facts remain that there was/is no virus; no one followed the science, and medical/pharmaceutical expertise is not based on science. The flawed thinking must be corrected, not by prescribing chemicals (medicine) to the innocent public, but by educating the experts about actual science.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Saeed,
an·ti·bod·y
noun
plural noun: antibodies
a blood protein produced in response to and counteracting a specific antigen. Antibodies combine chemically with substances which the body recognizes as alien, such as bacteria, viruses, and foreign substances in the blood.
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
Hi Jerry:
You are probably reading from virology/immunology, which is thoroughly debunked as fake science, at least in my books. These subjects hate chemical science/chemistry, which you are referring to. Otherwise, they would have sought help from chemists in isolating and characterizing THE “alien” and the relevant antibodies.
I do not accept their computer-drawn cartoon-based science or concepts. I am sorry.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Saeed,
I have no idea whose definition I had copied and pasted. So I went to my my Websters that I assigned for my university English composition class in 1959 after vaccines for polio had brought this disease under control.
“antibody n Chem.& Immune. a A substance, as an anti catalyst or anti toxin, that opposes the action of another substance. b Any of various bodies substances in the tissues or fluids, blood or serum, of an organism, which act ln antagonism to specific foreign bodies such as toxins or the bacteria producing the toxins. Agglutinins, antitoxins, precipitins, etc. are antibodies.
When I submitted the the 2nd comment I was unaware that comment of only the definition to which you respond had been submitted. You make no reference to the spin full of dirt which was purpose of my comment. Now, as I consider your comment and the two definitions, I consider the phrase of the first–which the body recognizes as alien–is a possible reason for the spoon full of dirt.
So I reason that the dirt produces many, many antotoxins. However, I cannot explain how it is that the dirt doe not cause an illness when the child eats it.
Have a good day
Reply
MattH
| #
Hi Jerry.
The eating of dirt with it’s bacteria stimulates the immune system through peyers patches.
People such as Dr. Robert Clancy have developed successful oral vaccines for respiratory illnesses by stimulating the peyers patches in the stomach. Helps the mucosal immune response.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Clancy_(doctor)
Excuse me for butting in Jerry.
Cheers. Matt
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
Hi Jerry:
I am unclear about your post as to what you are describing or asking a response for?
The only thing I consider here to respond is “after vaccines for polio had brought this disease under control.” This must also be from virology/immunology books, NOT from science.
As far as I know, polio is claimed to be caused by a virus. However, no one has shown the existence of that virus either. So, please, let me know, did they isolated and characterized the virus: no isolate, please, the virus (isolated and purified).
Virologists’ narrative is that a virus causes polio and gets treated with a vaccine. However, they cannot show the virus, so rest becomes imagination or an illusion.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Saeed,
an·ti·bod·y
noun
plural noun: antibodies
a blood protein produced in response to and counteracting a specific antigen. Antibodies combine chemically with substances which the body recognizes as alien, such as bacteria, viruses, and foreign substances in the blood.
Do you agree with this definition? I ask because I listened to a biologist teaching his adult students to essentially to give their children a spoon full of dirt daily to produce a diverse group of anti-bodies in their children”s blood.
An interested in what your opinion might be.
Have a good day
Reply
MattH
| #
Hi Jerry Krause.
It appears Dr. Saeed is saying there is no such thing as a virus causing the common cold, influenza, and the fact that the illness described as covid 19 had cardio vascular symptoms as well as influenza type respiratory symptoms , but offers no viable explanation for these health issues.
In science if you wish to debunk something, you should offer a viable alternative hypothesis.
A good pathologist with an electron microscope and expertise in histo-immuno-chemistry can come up with fairly solid hypotheses.
Jerry, I have been exploring some of the curious things in relation to climate of the recent past. The recent three year La Nina and the now current El Nino are being swallowed by the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_decadal_oscillation
Most research on the PDO is based around North West USA ocean influences but it is the only viable explanation for the current reduction of area of Antarctic sea ice extent.
The other factor is the recent Tonga eruption that simply blew one heck of a lot of geo-thermal heat into the atmosphere along with water vapor and particular matter that has nucleated a lot of water vapor into rain events.
Climate is more uncertain than having five wives.
Have a good day Jerry.
Matt
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
MattH:
@ “In science if you wish to debunk something, you should offer a viable alternative hypothesis.”
Let me explain this as follows.
Suppose the Crown arrests someone with a claim to be the murderer. The court later decides that there is a lack of evidence that the suspect is a murderer and frees the suspect. However, in your analogy, the Crown should say, sorry, your honor, the suspect has to be punished. Otherwise, the court has to provide an alternative murderer. Sorry, what kind of logic is it, MatthH?
The argument is that scientifically it has not been shown or proven that there exists a virus. That is it. Defining illness or linking it to something is a separate issue and has to be considered in its merit.
Secondly, regarding your reference to science, medical and pharmaceutical experts, particularly physicians/pharmacists, describe most of the virus-related stuff. However, if one looks at this aspect in detail, one would find that these professionals do not study and are trained in science. There are trained in prescribing and dispensing medicines, not in the science of chemicals/medicines. Hence claiming that they practice science is an invalid claim.
Reply
MattH
| #
Hi Dr. Saeed.
I refer this.
https://doctors4covidethics.org/vascular-and-organ-damage-induced-by-mrna-vaccines-irrefutable-proof-of-causality/
Further; From the scientists.
” 5. Coronavirus particles contain two prominent proteins: spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N)
To distinguish between infection and injection, we can again use immunohistochemistry, but this time apply it to another SARS-CoV-2 protein—namely, the nucleocapsid, which is found inside the virus particle, where it enwraps and protects the RNA genome. The rationale of this experiment is simple: cells infected with the virus will express all viral proteins, including the spike and the nucleocapsid. In contrast, the mRNA-based COVID vaccines (as well as the adenovirus vector-based ones produced by AstraZeneca and Janssen) will induce expression only of spike.”
So the pathologist has photographs of the cellular damage causing death, and foreign matter associated with the cellular damage described as spike protein.
Dr David Demming. “Normally in science when you come up with a novel result, you have to show how the previous science was wrong”
2.30 minutes of the following senate testimony.
I have watched Nobel laureate John F Clauser state that to refute a hypothesis you must provide an alternative.
I look forward to your alternative hypothesis to this observed and photographically recorded science Dr. Saeed.
Sadly, Dr. Arne Burkhardt passed away a couple of months ago. He came out of retirement and worked tirelessly night and day to serve humanity.
I am only challenging contradictions.
Have a nice day.
Saeed Qureshi
| #
MattH:
I read the link you provided and watched the video testimony by Dr. David Demming.
I am sorry you have not followed my question and view.
Let me explain it again. In your comment, you noted, “5. Coronavirus particles contain two prominent proteins: spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N),” and that is my question, who isolated those coronavirus particles?
The commonly accepted meaning of the word isolated is that component of interest (virus particles) be separated from other components in the sample. The end result of an isolation step is to have the pure isolated substance (in this case, virus particles). That is the issue; no one has isolated virus particles.
Certainly, people show pictures. However, that does not establish the presence or existence of particles of interest or the virus. These (separated) particles must be available in a test tube or vial.
Further, establishing the link of proteins you mentioned, they (proteins) must be extracted after isolating the virus particles and FROM the virus particles. No such study has been reported.
Therefore, claiming that the virus exists, has been isolated, and contains the proteins is scientifically invalid and should strongly and actively be challenged.
As I noted previously, the alternative hypothesis is not of discussion. I am sorry, I am not presenting a, or alternative hypothesis.
My focus and question are, as claimed, virus particles exist, so where to obtain the isolated virus particles or people who are studying the virus from where obtained the virus particles?
Please provide a link or reference for that.
The link must be for the isolated virus (and its proteins and RNAs), not for the isolates.
Thanks.
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi MattH,
Jordan B. Peterson and Richard Lindzen had a long dialogue (interview, conversation) (1/5/2023) about the GHE etc. And Lindzen introduced the fact that scientists have used physical models to better explain natural phenomenon as he referred to the current use of computer models to explain (understand) weather.
Herb and I had a long discussion about “the recent Tonga eruption” and I was disappointed that you did not join it. Maybe you were out fishing.
Someone has liken this very, very violent and unique eruption to a water cannon. And I believe that is a very good physical model. For when the first plug (the projectile) broke through the ocean surface it had to have the velocity necessary to reach the highest altitude reached. And this extreme altitude is what makes this eruption unique.
I stop here to allow you and others to comment about these simple four lines.
Have a good day
Reply
MattH
| #
Hi Jerry.
A water canon is a good analogy, as long, as the direct heat, silica particulate’s and other particulates, and gasses are acknowledged as well.
Ir will be two years this coming January. Some of the more severe consequences should start alleviating by then.
Time for work.
Best wishes Jerry.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Matt,
In the beginning the carbon dioxide, the molten lava, the liquid water had the density of dry ice, liquid water, and solid dust (dirt. molten lave). Yes, the compressed carbon dioxide molecules would expand very rapidly because they all were repelling each other creating the explosive force against anything that could be moved upward with an accelerated motion until this accelerated liquid and solid matter moving cleared the end of the solid cannon barrel. Consider the inertia of all the solid and liquid matter that isn”t moving with that which is moving and motion is being accelerated by the explosive expansion of the condensed carbon dioxide matter. Nothing is instantaneous! Even an explosion.
Have a good day
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Marr,
Less anyone question why I am commenting about volcanic eruptions here. Ask MattH.
Here is independent support for my reasoning about a water cannon model.
“View from the sky. Scientists were surprised to find that the blast left the volcanic slopes intact. All the eruptive energy seems to have been directed straight up to the sky, says MacKay. This oddity may help explain another remarkable feature of the eruption: plume height” (https://www.nationalgeographic.co.uk/science-and-technology/2022/11/tongas-strange-volcanic-eruption-was-even-more-massive-than-we-knew)
Have a good day
Joe
| #
Ivermectin treats covid 19….period. Dr Pierre Cory is using ivermectin as his number one drug to treat vaccine injuries
Reply
aaron
| #
Hi Joe
covid does not exist except on computer models, in-silico is the word you will find in front of isolated, in their ‘science’
in silico
ĭn sĭl′ĭ-kō
adverb & adjective
By computer modeling.
adjective
In computer simulation or in virtual reality
Reply
MattH
| #
Before the clot-shot was imposed on the population there were a number of credible medical practitioners describing an influenza type illness that included cardio vascular complications and hypoxia.
Curiously, people given early treatment including ivermectin had a much better chance of not dying from these symptoms.
Reply
MattH
| #
Oh, these people dying from these symptoms were not computer models.
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
Diagnosis and treatments were certainly computer models (or based on computer models), not reality.
Gary Brown
| #
Great topic, we never got this in all of our schooling years!
Qualified Immunity – A Legal, Practical, and Moral Failure
https://www.criminallegalnews.org/news/2021/feb/15/qualified-immunity-legal-practical-and-moral-failure/
Reply