FDA DOUBLES DOWN: New Misinformation Warning
The US Food and Drug Administration is determined to clamp down on Misinformation…
Within the last few days, the FDA, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has issued another warning against misinformation, telling people to be on the lookout for it.
The American public must be very careful going forward. There is a page on the FDA’s website on rumour control which was last updated on July 11th 2023.
Source: YouTube
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
VOWG
| #
To avoid disinformation, misinformation or any accurate information, avoid the F D A.
Reply
Tom
| #
…”The US Food and Drug Administration is determined to clamp down on Misinformation”…yahoo! The FDA has finally decided to shut itself down. I hope it’s taking down its brother, the CDC, with it. Rejoice, dear comrades in slavery!
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
From the book, “Slaying the Virus and Vaccine Dragon” (available from Amazon), the regulatory practices at authorities (FDA) are causing misinformation situations.
“Furthermore, it is assumed and emphasized that the practice of medicine is highly sophisticated and complex. It requires multiple years of study and experience, following only a set path in a hospital environment.
This mindset, unfortunately, created a cult-like system that everyone must accept and follow at its face value. There is no room for critically evaluating or considering input from others. Instead, the select group, patronized by regulatory or bureaucratic authorities, must approve any smallest suggestion or input, otherwise be rejected, claiming a lack of appropriate scientific understanding or outside the domain of modern medical understanding.
A third-party review is the only practical way to appropriately judge professional claims and outcomes’ usefulness and effectiveness and address the current unfortunate situation. In reality, the professionals should explain the science in simple language so that the patient and the third-party professionals can follow it easily. Therefore, it is incorrect to suggest that the outside reviewers must first be competent in reading the medical literature with a similar understanding, level of education and training as the professionals.
Critical review or evaluation by external experts is an expected and standard practice practically in every profession except in the medical and pharmaceutical professions. Anyone familiar with third-party reviewers of big or small appliances or service providers would attest to it. For example, the reviewers do not have to have an advanced degree or detailed understanding of a car’s engineering and mechanical aspects to review the vehicle’s performance. Instead, they review the car’s performance against the claims made by the manufacturers. There is a critical lack of this understanding and practice in the medical and pharmaceutical professions.”
Reply