FDA Asks Judge to Seal Pfizer’s COVID Vax Safety Data for 55 Years!

The federal government shields Pfizer from liability. Gives it billions of dollars. Makes Americans take its product. But won’t let you see the data supporting its safety/efficacy. Who does the government work for?

The FDA has asked a federal judge to make the public wait until the year 2076 to disclose all of the data and information it relied upon to license Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.

That is not a typo.

It wants 55 years to produce this information to the public. 

As explained in a prior article, the FDA repeatedly promised “full transparency” with regard to Covid-19 vaccines, including reaffirming “the FDA’s commitment to transparency” when licensing Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.

With that promise in mind, in August and immediately following approval of the vaccine, more than 30 academics, professors, and scientists from this country’s most prestigious universities requested the data and information submitted to the FDA by Pfizer to license its COVID-19 vaccine.

The FDA’s response?  It produced nothing.  So, in September, my firm filed a lawsuit against the FDA on behalf of this group to demand this information.

To date, almost three months after it licensed Pfizer’s vaccine, the FDA still has not released a single page. 

Not one.

Instead, two days ago, the FDA asked a federal judge to give it until 2076 to fully produce this information. 

The FDA asked the judge to let it produce the 329,000+ pages of documents Pfizer provided to the FDA to license its vaccine at the rate of 500 pages per month, which means its production would not be completed earlier than 2076.

The FDA’s promise of transparency is, to put it mildly, a pile of illusions.

It took the FDA precisely 108 days from when Pfizer started producing the records for licensure (on May 7, 2021) to when the FDA licensed the Pfizer vaccine (on August 23, 2021).

Taking the FDA at its word, it conducted an intense, robust, thorough, and complete review and analysis of those documents in order to assure that the Pfizer vaccine was safe and effective for licensure.

While it can conduct that intense review of Pfizer’s documents in 108 days, it now asks for over 20,000 days to make these documents available to the public. 

So, let’s get this straight. The federal government shields Pfizer from liability.  Gives it billions of dollars.  Makes Americans take its product.  But won’t let you see the data supporting its product’s safety and efficacy.  Who does the government work for?

The lesson yet again is that civil and individual rights should never be contingent upon a medical procedure.  Everyone who wants to get vaccinated and boosted should be free to do so.

But nobody should be coerced by the government to partake in any medical procedure.

Certainly not one where the government wants to hide the full information relied upon for its licensure until the year 2076!

See more here: aaronsiri.substack.com

Bold emphasis added

Header image: Western Overseas Corporation

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (6)

  • Avatar

    very old white guy

    |

    329,000 pages of documents. With that many pages I would bet a hundred to one that they are all lies.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Josh

      |

      ALL lies? I’ll take those odds.

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Mervyn

    |

    When are people going to wake up to the criminals who are directly responsible for the deaths of so many innocent people who received the experimental gene therapy jabs? From the NIH to CDC to FDA to Big Pharma, they have all colluded in the covid jab crimes against humanity.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Alan

    |

    “Who does the government work for?” That is the big question we all should be asking, and not just in the USA.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Charles Higley

    |

    When they come through with ALL the documents and the data are not fatally flawed and are indeed favorable, I might, that is MIGHT, consider the jab.

    But, wait, as the mRNA only codes for ONE (spike) protein on the virus surface, it cannot possibly confer workable immunity, only non-neutralizing antibodies which encourage antibody dependent enhancement (ADE). Not to mention that the spike protein is the most toxic protein they know of, for about 20 years, no less. Add to this that the jabs are NOT VACCINES by the real definition (not the altered definition of the CDC to try to fit the non-vaccine jabs).

    Why on Earth would anyone take gene therapy for a flu-type illness? We know that such viruses mutate very rapidly and vaccines quickly become ineffective, which is why the influenza vaccines are rarely more than 50% effective, usually more like 20–30%.

    This begs the question of why they would not only want multiple jabs that would make one’s body make a toxic protein but they want to do everybody, which is not only bad but wrong medical practice. Now, Faustus Fauci wants to jab infants, based on nothing. Evil is as evil does.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    K Kaiser

    |

    This in an outrageous request.
    If I were the judge dealing with that, I’d say:
    You have 108 days (max) to provide the entire document (un-altered and un-redacted)– or you go to jail (for 55 years)..

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via