FDA Allows Damning Whistleblower Testimony on COVID Vaccines
The FDA held a Vaccine Advisory Committee meeting yesterday (September 17, 2021) to discuss authorizing a third Pfizer COVID-19 “booster shot.” There were signs heading into the meeting this week that there could be some fireworks at this hearing, as two top vaccine research scientists at the FDA, Dr. Marion Gruber and Dr. Phillip Kause, the Director and Deputy Director of the Office of Vaccines Research, recently resigned.
This followed a report published in The Lancet from 18 officials at the FDA opposing the Biden Administration’s plan to start distributing Pfizer “booster shots” later this month (September, 2021) before the FDA had even approved them.
To say that there were fireworks at the Vaccine Advisory Committee meeting yesterday might be a gross understatement. The 18 member committee voted 16 to 2 AGAINST approving the booster shots, although later they did give their endorsement on approving them for people 65 and older. (Emphasis added)
During the “open session” part of the meeting, dissenting doctors questioning the Pfizer shots were given a chance to address the public with their concerns, and they presented to the public REAL data about the shots that up until now has been heavily censored.
Dr. Joseph Fraiman, an emergency room physician from New Orleans who did his studies at Cornell Medical School, stated that there are no trials large enough yet to prove that the COVID-19 vaccines reduce hospitalization without causing serious harm. (Emphasis added)
He lamented the fact that the “vaccine hesitant” coming into his emergency room were more educated on the risks of the COVID-19 vaccine than those vaccinated.
I know many think that vaccine hesitants are dumb, or just misinformed. That’s not at all what I’ve seen. In fact typically, independent of education level, the vaccine hesitant I’ve met in the ER are more familiar with vaccine studies, and more aware of their own COVID risks than the vaccinated. For example, many of my nurses have refused the vaccine despite seeing COVID-19 cause more death and devastation than most people have.
I ask them why refuse the vaccine? They tell me while they’ve seen the first hand dangers of COVID, the elderly, the obese, diabetics; they think their risk is low. They’re not wrong. A 30-year-old female has about a 1 in 7000 chance of catching COVID and being hospitalized over it.
He pointed out that a recent study showed that the risk of vaccine-induced Myocarditis (heart disease) in young males is higher than their risk from hospitalization from COVID.
He called for larger studies to be conducted.
We the medical establishment cannot confidently call out anti-COVID-19 activists who publicly claim the vaccines harm more than they save, especially in the young and healthy, the fact that we do not have the clinical evidence to say these activists are wrong, should terrify us all.
Steve Kirsch, the Executive Director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund, also gave testimony, and he began his comments with:
I am going to focus my remarks today with the elephant in the room that nobody likes to talk about, that the vaccines kill more people than they save.
He presented data to prove that the belief that these vaccines are “safe” simply isn’t true. He gives several facts to show this, most all of which we have previously covered here at Health Impact News.
For example, people have 71 times more risk of heart attack following COVID-19 vaccines than any other vaccine.
Kirsch claims that expert analysis of existing data, including the 6-month Pfizer trials and VAERS data, prove that the shots kill more people than they allegedly save.
About 411 deaths per million doses. That translates into about 150,000 people having died (from the Pfizer shots).
He then presented some data from the Israel Ministry of Health.
The real numbers confirm that we kill more than we save. And I would love to look at the Israel ministry of health data on the 90+ year olds where we went from a 94.4 percent vaccinated group to 82.9 percent vaccinated in the last 4 months.
In the most optimistic scenario it means that 50 percent of the vaccinated people died and 0 percent of unvaccinated people died. Unless you can explain that to the public you cannot approve the boosters.
Dr. Jessica Rose, PhD, MSc, BSc, whom we have featured previously here on Health Impact News and has done extensive studies on the VAERS data, also gave a presentation where she showed that we have had a 1000 percent increase in adverse events following COVID vaccines, as compared to all previous vaccines in prior years, something we have covered extensively here at Health Impact News. (Emphasis added)
See more here: jamesfetzer.org
Header image: Western Overseas Corporation
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Saeed Qureshi
| #
PSI published an article on the topic (https://principia-scientific.com/fdas-false-unscientific-deceitful-review-of-pfizers-covid-19-vaccine/ ) in December 2020, stating, “Although repeatedly claims have been made in news media for not “cutting corners,” however, not conducting such studies certainly falls in the category of “cutting corners.” And then concluding the article stating, “History will not judge the FDA and the Committee kindly!” Thus, the expressed worries appear to be coming true.
It is hoped that a reassessment of the diagnosis and vaccination will be considered with the highest priority.
Reply
Charles Higley
| #
What beggars reality is that they would allow booster shots for those with aging or compromised immune systems. The jab is targeted at the immune system and they want compromised immune systems to be repeatedly challenged. Yeah, that will end well.
Reply
Bill
| #
I still have trouble seeing how OSHA will mandate this for people to “prevent the spread to other employees” when it’s proven not to stop the spread to anyone. In fact it seems to amplify and since these fully “vaccinated” people feel safe they don’t wear the masks to limit the shedding of excessive viral loads they bread in their bodies. It’s peak clown world right now. Someone tell me this is wrong cause it’s driving me nuts being outside Plato’s cave.
Reply
Boris Badenov
| #
Except that masks aren’t proven to do a lick of good and actually do more harm. We all know the only reason for this ChiCom/Faucet Virus is to kill and the ‘vaccines’ are designed to help that process. Along with hospitals using treatments that are anything but. I’m a lot more worried about the shedding of the spike proteins.
Reply
very old white guy
| #
We just can’t wait for number four or five or six, the anticipation is “killing” us.
Reply
Tom
| #
Of course, none of these booster injection will ever be in any kind of trial to determine safety and efficacy. Since the original mRNA injections have an ARR or absolute risk reduction factor of 1%, where is the proof that additional injections will be safe and effective? It will never exist. If big bad pharma morons wanted their products to actually be safe and effective as well as trustworthy, they would do long term, non-faked and efficient trials with no altering the results. Never gonna happen.
Reply
Joseph Olson
| #
FDA didn’t screen “open” session for proper GROUP THINK and lost the directed narrative.
More of Steve’s research > https://skirsch.com/covid/deaths.pdf
Reply
Bevan
| #
Why did the governments promote this injection as a “Vaccine”? They obviously wanted to trick the population into accepting it when it is in fact Gene therapy.
Not being a biologist, I am trying desperately to understand what this means. As every living persons has a different DNA, how can anyone predict what gene therapy is going to do to our cells which contain our individual, unique DNA. From the number of deaths and disabilities arising from the injection I suspect no one knows but they will happily take our money.
Reply
T
| #
Any chance you could let us know the timing within the committee meeting in which each expert addresses their concerns, so I can find it within the official recording?
Reply