Farce: UN PCR Test Reads Any Human DNA as ‘COVID19 Positive’
Independent researcher identifies that the UN World Health Organization (WHO) is using a COVID-19 testing protocol that will, in effect, give a positive reading of coronavirus simply from a common sequence of human DNA we all possess.
PCR testing, otherwise called Polymerase chain reaction, is an established method to make millions of copies of a specific DNA sample. It allows scientists to take a very small sample of DNA and amplify it to a large enough amount to study in detail.
The test was invented in 1984 by the American biochemist Kary Mullis at Cetus Corporation. But Mullis was clear the test was never intended to be used for identifying diseases such as a coronavirus because of the huge inaccuracies that were likely.
Below, highlighted in yellow, blogger Fauxlex shows the sequence “CTCCCTTTGTTGTGTTGT” which is an 18-character primer sequence found in the WHO coronavirus PCR testing protocol document. It is also common to all the DNA of all humans, whether healthy or sick.
Fauxlex reports that several private companies (Sigma-Aldrich, Thermo Fisher) whose PCR primer sequences were longer using this insane protocol.
Kary Mullis (photo, top) won the Nobel Prize in Science for inventing the PCR. He died last year before the pandemic and gave this warning about the test:
“[T]here is a common misimpression that the viral-load tests actually count the number of viruses in the blood, these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all; they can only detect proteins that are believed, in some cases wrongly, to be unique to HIV.”
As Fauxlex laments:
“The primer sequences are what get amplified by the PCR process in order to be detected and designated a “positive” test result. It just so happens this exact same 18-character sequence, verbatim, is also found on Homo sapiens chromosome 8! As far as I can tell, this means that the WHO test kits should find a positive result in all humans. Can anyone explain this otherwise?
I really cannot overstate the significance of this finding. At minimum, it should have a notable impact on test results.
Homo sapiens chromosome 8, GRCh38.p12 Primary Assembly
Sequence ID: NC_000008.11 Length: 145138636
Range 1: 63648346 to 63648363 is “CTCCCTTTGTTGTGTTGT”
Update: After some effort, I have finally discovered a way to display proof (beyond my screenshots) that human chromosome 8 has this exact same 18-character sequence. Please try the link below. The sequence is shown at the bottom of the page.
Read the full findings at pieceofmindful.com.
This is very disturbing because the WHO will know full well the PCR test was never designed for being a test for diseases. Without an official explanation nor any media advice on this anomaly, it is becoming apparent that WH), governments and the media are unethically, perhaps criminally, promoting a COVID-19 test designed to show a positive result anywhere they want to find one. This is before we factor in that the PCR test process itself is inherently error-prone so that a considerable number will show false negatives.
About the author: John O’Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder (with Dr Tim Ball) of Principia Scientific International (PSI). John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann in the ‘science trial of the century‘. O’Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘Slayers’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world’s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Trackback from your site.
tom0mason
| #
PCR testing, otherwise called Polymerase chain reaction, is an established method to make millions of copies of a specific DNA sample. It allows scientists to take a very small sample of DNA and amplify it to a large enough amount to study in detail.
And with the COVID-19 tests there is NO standard to the number of duplications that are applied to the sample to amplify up the fragment. This means that authorities can apply 20 Polymerase chain reactions, or 200 iterations to the sample. In fact they can get a positive result just by increasing the number of iterations as they please (they could also reduce the number of positives just by reining back the number of iterations, that reduces the amplification).
So the big question is when is a positive test a real indication of infection? Or is it just more ‘scientific’ nonsense used to frighten people, make big pharma a fat profit, and justify more lockdowns for political reasons.
Reply
Andy Rowlands
| #
My guess would be the latter Tom.
Reply
Josh
| #
If the “WHO test kits should find a positive result in all humans”, then why do they not? How has NZ managed to test so many people and after 100 days not find any positives? Do they use some test other than the WHO one? If anyone using the WHO kits actually found consistently 100% positives they would throw the test out. I don’t know what to make of this article.
Reply
Charles Higley
| #
That’s easy. Given enough cycles or iterations of PCR you can make any test be positive. Back off on the cycles and you get negatives, back off to 1–5 cycles and you get all negatives. The test is not fit for purpose, as its job is to amplify anything that is there. There is always background noise and it’s just a matter of how high they turn the volume.
Our lungs are awash in shed cells, with DNA and RNA, and also exosomes, with RNA and coronavirus-like proteins, in response to a number of stimuli or stresses. The tests are crap.
Reply
Dev
| #
Great information John & very good reason to refuse tests to not feed ths ridiculous agenda.
Reply
John O'Sullivan
| #
Cheers, Dev. I certainly won’t accept any such test knowing these facts.
Reply
Tom O
| #
And with today’s hysteria, IF you have a health issue of any sort – a bad sprain or touch of food poisoning, or even mild chest pains, you are afraid to go to a medical facility for evaluation because you probably can’t get through the door without a test, and none of the tests are reliable enough to not be afraid you will end up in quarantine with a tube shoved down your throat in 48 hours. And there is no protection from the medical mafia as governments have just about given them free will to do “what’s best for the majority.”
Reply
Lela Brister
| #
Layperson begs to answer on nano technology on gel delivery, via all inoculations.
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
https://principia-scientific.com/covid-19-vaccine-not-possible-for-a-virus-not-yet-identified/
Reply
Tom O
| #
It’s not possible to identify a virus that has so many different attack pathways that this virus is supposed to have. It is either a series of viruses that share a lot of common fragments or COVID is a cover for something happening in the background being used to drive the implementation of a world government. The second is far more plausible than this being a single virus, or even a virus at all.
Reply
NIcole
| #
China is using the tests as a DNA dragnet. https://7news.com.au/travel/china/chinas-mass-dna-collection-of-citizens-violates-human-rights-and-international-law-report-finds-c-1109119
Reply
John
| #
Normally a test instrument is calibrated against a known standard- Its what is often referred to a the “Gold Standard”
In classic test instruments there are various methods and equipment to “proove” the accuracy/repeatability etc.
Tn temperature you use melting points and freezing points of known liquids and solids.
In Pressure a dead weight tester or barometer or other calibration standard is used.
In Flow you use gravimeter weight or volumetric measure to determine the flow rate etc similar devices for density mass for example. Length is based on a meter and mass a kg or gram.
In calibration of medical devices there are also test protocols and gold standards to prove accuracy and reliability and repeatability. e.g. Titration. It’s a method or process of determining the concentration of a dissolved substance in terms of the smallest amount of reagent of known concentration required to bring about a given effect in reaction with a known volume of the test solution.
For this device there is no standard, this is besides the fact that it was not designed as a diagnostic tool.
For example you would need a proven sample of a corona CoV-2 virus with a known qty or a known something to calibrate the instrument against or to verify consistent results.
This PCR device cannot distinguish and identify against various corona viruses.
The standard testing is a methodology called Koch’s Postulates and then identification and proving using the separated identified pathogen to replicate the condition in an uninfected person. It cumbersome and slow and expensive therefore they have tried to make a device do what they want. Unfortunately it cannot. So PCR is not for for purpose simply put.
Reply
baccarat
| #
I feel that is among the so much vital info for me.
And i’m satisfied reading your article. However wanna statement on few general issues, The website taste is great, the articles
is actually excellent : D. Just right activity, cheers https://lucabet168.com
Reply
baccarat
| #
I feel that is among the so much vital info for me.
And i’m satisfied reading your article. However wanna statement on few general issues,
The website taste is great, the articles is actually excellent :
D. Just right activity, cheers https://lucabet168.com
Reply
NotAnonymous
| #
Dear Steve O’Sullivan
You claim you are a seasoned science writer, but that blog post is not by Steve Kelly! It is by an anonymous blogger… called Fauxlex… a quality source of technical info?!
Regards
Reply
John O'Sullivan
| #
Thanks for the heads up. Now fixed.
Reply
NotAnonymous
| #
No probs! Who is Fauxlex? What are their credentials?
Reply