Elon Musk Exposes Anthony Fauci’s Cozy Working Relationship With Wife
Twitter CEO Elon Musk has responded to a post on the platform that appeared to push back on claims that outgoing White House chief medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci, in his post as head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, has never been untruthful or dishonest.
Entrepreneur and moderate Republican backer Marc Andreessen posted a tweet that contained a screengrab supportive of Fauci which said it is neither “accurate or fair” to claim that Fauci “has ever lied,” to which Musk posted a link to a congressional .pdf file of a Newsweek story headlined, “Fauci Was ‘Untruthful’ To Congress About Wuhan Lab Research, New Documents Appear to Show.”
The September 2021 report noted:
“The National Institute of Health (NIH) has denied funding studies that would make a coronavirus more dangerous to humans after it was accused of doing so following the release of research proposals. The documents were obtained and released by The Intercept on Tuesday after it launched a FOIA lawsuit.
Richard Ebright, board of governors professor of chemistry and chemical biology at Rutgers University and laboratory director at the Waksman Institute of Microbiology, told Newsweek these documents show “unequivocally” that NIH grants were used to fund controversial gain-of-function (GOF) research at the Wuhan Insitute of Virology in China—something U.S. infectious disease expert Dr. Anthony Fauci has denied.”
“The documents make it clear that assertions by the NIH director, Francis Collins, and the NIAID director, Anthony Fauci, that the NIH did not support gain-of-function research or potential pandemic pathogen enhancement in Wuhan are untruthful,” Ebright said.
Following his response with the .pdf file, Musk wrote:
“Almost no one seems to realize that the head of bioethics at NIH – the person who is supposed to make sure that Fauci behaves ethically – is his wife.”
His second tweet also contained a link to a Wikipedia page describing the life and career of Christine Grady, who is married to Fauci. The page states that Grady “is an American nurse and bioethicist who serves as the head of the Department of Bioethics at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center.”
“Multiple sections of the grant proposals and grant progress reports make it clear that the grants funded gain-of-function research of concern in Wuhan,” Ebright told Newsweek last year, citing the documents obtained by The Intercept.
Meanwhile, Musk said this week that former Twitter employees had managed a channel in Slack titled “Fauci Fan Club” in which they fawned over the outgoing NIAID director during the recent COVID pandemic.
The New York Post reported:
Musk tweeted the claim in a thread that was highly critical of Fauci, who was accused by the mogul of lying about so-called “gain-of-function” research that some suggest may have played a role in the spread of the coronavirus.
“Despite these glaring issues, Twitter nonetheless had an internal Slack channel unironically called ‘Fauci Fan Club,’” Musk tweeted late Tuesday. He did not elaborate as to how many employees participated in the Slack channel.
During the pandemic, Twitter — under the old management team — regularly censored coronavirus-related content that ran afoul of information being put out by Fauci and federal health agencies.
Some users who routinely posted counter-research and information, like Alex Berenson, were eventually booted off the platform, though he as since been reinstated after he filed a lawsuit against the platform.
Perhaps with an eye towards those incidents, Musk sparked a strong reaction this week after he announced the social media platform would promote “reasoned” skepticism of scientific data.
“New Twitter policy is to follow the science, which necessarily includes reasoned questioning of the science,” Musk tweeted.
Writer Katherine Brodsky tweeted in response, “Also known as the scientific method,” to which Musk replied with a “bullseye” emoji, suggesting he agreed with her response and thought it was accurate.
See more here conservativebrief.com
Bold emphasis added
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
aaron
| #
musk, fauci, gates, biden, trump, ect all play for the same team and it ain’t ours
Reply
Cal Aylmer
| #
I’m glad all the stuff i had worked out by Jan 3rd 2020 is coming into the minds of the supposedly touted most brilliant minds on Earth and 3 years on presented to the sheeple for consumption. My question is why is it that there were only about 3 of us on this planet that had this entire crime worked out BEFORE it was launched main stream ? didn’t anyone else have to pass grade 12 ?
Reply
Robert Beatty
| #
The US is demonstrating to the world what happens when the wheels falloff a democracy cart. We have the 2020 inexplicable election result. The strange 2022 mid term vote. The Congress speaker selection debacle, The Covid-19 ‘vaccination’ fatal sham. The porous Southern border catastrophe. Public spending out of control. National security organisations and financial heavies weighing in to affect political outcomes. Chinese financial influence in several high places. Galloping Marxism enshrined within key institutions.
This is not a free democracy. My idea of freedom is to have access to Citizens Initiated Referendum (CIR). Here the ‘people’ take back control of their lives from those who spend the money. CIR returns financial surveillance to tax payers. It also provides much needed political stability.
To work effectively, CIR provisions must be enshrined in a federal constitution, and applicable to all the States. Then any mandated CIR issue becomes annexed to that constitution which cannot be conveniently forgotten by the ‘born to rule’ mob.
Does PSI have the muscle to draft a plan of action which restores freedom to the USA, before it is all too late?
Reply