Donna Laframboise Shines a Hard Light on the Rotten Heart of the IPCC

Donna Laframboise’s expose, by an investigative journalist, is the product of two years of research. Its conclusion: almost nothing we’ve been told about the IPCC is true.

The IPCC depends heavily on computer climate models. But the models include hundreds, even thousands, of variables whose real values are simply unknown and so must be parameterized—assigned values according to the programmers’ prejudices. Even then, they fail to describe Earth’s climate system realistically.

They’re also not subject to falsification because their many ad hoc assumptions can be adjusted to account for any observations. Consequently, their projections for future climate lack credibility—as was revealed recently when the British Meteorological Office published data showing there’s been no global warming for over 16 years, contrary to model predictions.

The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) presents itself as a purely scientific organization tasked with providing unbiased assessments of the science of climate for use by policymakers. In reality, it is arbitrarily and selectively exclusive and agenda-driven, lacking discipline and accountability.

Donna concludes that the IPCC is not an objective, policy-neutral, institutionally accountable, high-quality scientific review organization with accountability, but deeply biased, highly political, largely unaccountable advocacy organization run, maintained, and protected by activists who choose less qualified candidates, expel dissent, expunge reviews, practice systemic confirmation bias, and push hard for a political agenda set twenty years before the evidence was in.

She recommends disbandment. It’s hard to disagree.

Source: YouTube

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.