Doctors Being Instructed To Lie To You About The Climate

In theory, people being more political sounds great. Less dreary conversations about the weather and the ‘footie’, and more watercoolers surrounded by colleagues fizzing with enthusiasm about democracy and its pleasures

But the actual practice of this presupposes that we will all be open-minded and curious and – unless we are extremely learned about something – that the opinion of all citizens shall be equal.

This came to mind on reading that the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) has this week issued new guidance instructing doctors, as ‘trusted members of the community’, to lecture their poor patients about the ‘dangers’ of ‘climate change’.

This is troubling enough given the average duration of a face-to-face appointment with a GP in England – when you finally get one – is just 10 minutes.

Furthermore, this 11-page document also suggests that doctors should cause even more anxiety to patients by ‘working from home’ and cutting back on tests and prescriptions – in the name of ‘saving the planet’, of course.

So basically doctors are being advised by the RCP to do less of the things doctors have historically been required to do while amping up the scolding about an area they have no training in.

It also urges doctors, after scaring their patients with talk of burning rivers and the like, to keep an eye out for the poor creatures showing signs of ‘eco-distress’ – that is, anxiety and depression allegedly caused by ‘climate change’.

I would venture that if this condition exists in any great numbers, it’s caused not by ‘climate change’ itself but by people banging on about it, alongside the other anxieties that stem from not being able to get a GP appointment, a medical test, or a prescription.

We’re not quite at the stage of those crazy Canucks.

In 2021, a doctor in British Columbia diagnosed a woman with ‘climate change’ – thought to be a world first – after she reported having breathing problems following a hot summer featuring a slew of forest fires.

How many years at medical school did it take to come to this razor-sharp conclusion?

Dr Kyle Merritt opined:

‘She has diabetes. She has some heart failure… She lives in a trailer, no air conditioning.

All of her health problems have all been worsened. And she’s really struggling to stay hydrated.

I’m sure we’ll get to where Canada is eventually, though. When a society is as single-minded about scaring itself as the Kool-Aid-quaffing Canadians have been for some time, there’s no telling what rabbit holes we’ll race each other to the bottom of.

It’s telling that the RCP document showcases such condescending gems from the World Health Organization as ‘don’t debate the science’ and ‘talk about the health benefits of climate action’.

I wonder what health benefits the people inside the ambulances blocked by Just Stop Oil over the past few years have gained from climate change action?

The NHS isn’t just keen to lecture patients about ‘climate change’, it’s also chasing the ‘Net Zero’ dream.

A rather chilling report published earlier this year in the Telegraph revealed that the NHS plans to introduce electric ambulances to reach green targets.

Paramedics have already expressed concern about the dangerous effect this will have on patients, as ambulances spend hours recharging instead of attending emergencies.

Former chancellor Nigel Lawson once famously said that the NHS is the closest thing that the English have to a religion, which makes doctors the priests.

When the NHS itself follows the new false gods of everything from climate to ‘trans rights’, the stage is set for the mayhem of unbridled magical thinking.

Like the old priests, doctors are often no better than the rest of us; often, they’re worse.

The majority of them may well be driven by the desire to improve the human condition – but the idea that they are somehow holy receptacles of wisdom is absurd.

I’d listen to a doctor’s advice on what to do with, say, a broken leg, because I’m aware that they studied the subjects of sickness and health into their mid-twenties, while I was chasing off to interview gormless pop stars.

But take lessons from them on politics or lifestyle? No thanks.

See more here climatechangedispatch

Header image: The Mirror

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (4)

  • Avatar

    VOWG

    |

    My doctor knows less about climate than I do and I think I know more about virology than she does. Oh well.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    geo

    |

    The doctors lied to us about the covid scam so what’s new?

    Reply

  • Avatar

    David Hamilton Russell

    |

    Once you believe the first lie, all the other lies follow. The first lie is: AGW.

    1) never experimentally demonstrated. All such attempts merely demonstrate CO2 has a lower specific heat than regular air. Actual experiments show more CO2 causes less warming (J. E. Solheim, 2016)

    2) Multiple papers show warming happens first, then the rise in CO2. Thus AGW violates causality itself, as causes do not happen after effects

    3) scientific consensus is that 90%+ of global warming happening in oceans, but oceans are warmer than air and thus cannot be warmed by them without violating the 2nd Law.

    Q.E.D.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via