definitive proofs of ancient technology bigger, faster, better than ‘modern’

This documentation is the product of 41 years now in civic activism, academic study, and professional practice. This includes 18 years working with both parties’ “leaderships” for US domestic and foreign policy to end poverty that led to two UN summits for heads of state, with good news that ~90 percent of the thousands of Members of Congress we worked with keeping their word to vote full-funding to end poverty, and ~10 percent in “leadership” positions who would only and always lie and renege on all promises (including all Bushes and Clintons).

My personal conclusions:

2. Cosmic collisions ending superior technology ~12,000 years ago

While I have invested hundreds of hours in professional exploration of this fascinating ancient history, I have not committed the upgraded and time-consuming work to professionally research sufficient connected areas for comprehensive context, synthesis, and organization into documented work for public benefit.

1. Anti-gravity or superior lifting and transport machinery,
2. superior tools for faster and more precise megalithic construction,
3. symmetrical precision impossible for hand-guided work and not yet attempted at the scale in these examples with modern computer-guidance.

3. How far-out our brightest minds think

This specific repeated term was to silence refutations of the “official” JFK assassination claims, which you should explore to prove fully our .01% leader-liars will openly kill challengers (including Dr. King, as proven by their family civil trial verdict that US agents assassinated Martin). This doublethink is typical to apply ethics to areas not challenging .01% power, and apply propaganda when challenged.

• Newton believed alchemy is possible: what we can simply describe today as God’s math to add and subtract atomic particles to instantly transform one element into another. His literal million words of documentation demonstrate this as the single topic he concluded most compelling, melding science with spirituality, and keeping secret to avoid execution as a heretic (consider Bruno, along with Galileo, etc.).
• Descartes’ conclusions of mathematics also connected to God, with his attention founding modern philosophy. Take to heart his words how rare it is to encounter open minds, and “official” response to condemn then ban his books:

“But now, after having once and for all put to the test the judgments of men, I here again approach these same questions regarding God and the human mind, and at the same time treat the beginnings of the whole of first philosophy, but in such a way that I have no expectation of approval from the vulgar and no wide audience of readers.

Rather, I am an author to none who read these things but those who seriously meditate with me, who have the ability and the desire to withdraw their mind from the senses and at the same time from all prejudices.

Such people I know all too well to be few and far between. As to those who do not take care to comprehend the order and series of my reasons but eagerly dispute over single conclusions by themselves, as is the custom for many-those, I say, will derive little benefit from a reading of this treatise; and although perhaps they might find an occasion for quibbling in many spots, still it is not an easy matter for them to raise an objection that is either compelling or worthy of response.”   ~ Rene Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy, 1641, “Preface to the Reader.”

Descartes is considered the founder of modern philosophy, the founder of analytical geometry (which led to calculus), and a founder of the Scientific Revolution. Descartes was well-known in his age, but highly controversial.

His work was condemned by the Roman Catholic Church in 1633, and his books put on the Index of Prohibited Books in 1663. The University of Utrecht condemned his work in 1643, where he had previously taught.

5. Videos of Ancient Aliens to modern history

I’ve read David’s last three books, which I highly recommend, and find no internal nor external inconsistencies. From David’s channel, publicly shared discussions on evidence and testimony of ancient aliens.

See more here blogspot.com

Header image: flikr

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.