COVID Vaccines are Not Gene Therapy
The State and Big Pharma sponsored “fact” checkers have now been deployed to further discredit British Conservative MP, Andrew Bridgen.
This is not in any way to establish any facts of the matter but simply to serve as a distraction from the fact(!) that he is asking too many pertinent questions.
True, the COVID “vaccines” are not gene therapy but they have just as little in common with proper vaccines too.
Not to be too distracted ourselves, I don’t want to make a big deal about it but, with permission, this is what Mike Yeadon has to say on the matter:
I don’t think it matters, but I agree not to call them “gene therapy”.
What matters:
- Same or different technology compared with prior vaccines? (different).
- Decades of safe clinical experience with the technology? (No, essentially none in a public health setting).
- Are there reasonable grounds to hold concerns about the safety and tolerability of these gene-based injections? (Yes. They unequivocally convey an unavoidable toxic liability, as several of us have been warning before any of these injections received emergency use authorization).
And, of course, in the greatest twist of irony of all, what really, really matters is that Mike can’t actually make his valuable contributions to the debate that should be happening on this subject, where he is most eminently qualified, because he’s censored too!
 |
I can’t tweet. If I use my daughters account to post, virtually no one will know who the account owner is.
You could post in quotes, “This from Dr Mike Yeadon, still banned from his second Twitter account, early in 2022”.
More at Dead Man Talking
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend the Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Trackback from your site.
JaKo
| #
Well, consider this:
“If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck.”
And the FDA Definition (from July 2018):
“Human gene therapy seeks to modify or manipulate the expression of a gene or to alter the biological properties of living cells for therapeutic use. Gene therapy is a technique that modifies a person’s genes to treat or cure disease …”
From Lew Rockwell (yesterday) Dr. Mercola’s well-reasoned, sourced and referenced article.
Cheers, JaKo
Reply
VOWG
| #
I guess when the executive from the drug company said it was gene therapy he was lying?
Reply
Tom
| #
No, these mRNA poisons are actually gene ALTERING therapies. It sayeth so in the documentation released by moderna at the time of their trials. They said these mRNA injections are gene therapy…their words, not mine. And they certainly are not vaccines because the CDC or maybe the FDA had to change the definition of vaccines to make these gene therapy potions fit another invented definition for a vaccine. They are not vaccines under the older definition which always sufficed for decades.
Reply
cn
| #
Bayer Executive: mRNA Shots are ‘Gene Therapy’ Marketed as ‘Vaccines’ to Gain Public Trust
The president of Bayer’s Pharmaceuticals Division told international “experts” during a globalist health conference that the mRNA COVID-19 shots are indeed “cell and gene therapy” marketed as “vaccines” to be palatable to the public.
Stefan Oelrich, president of Bayer’s Pharmaceuticals Division, made these comments at this year’s World Health Summit, which took place in Berlin from October 24-26 and hosted 6,000 people from 120 countries. Oelrich told his fellow international “experts” from academia, politics, and the private sector that the novel mRNA COVID “vaccines” are actually “cell and gene therapy” that would have otherwise been rejected by the public if not for a “pandemic” and favorable marketing.
https://www.europereloaded.com/bayer-executive-mrna-shots-are-gene-therapy-marketed-as-vaccines-to-gain-public-trust/
Reply
Tom O
| #
For what it’s not worth, I suspect that there IS an attempt to distance the term “gene-therapy” from these shots because in essence, they are NOT therapies though they use the same principles. Gene therapy IS using modification for specific, useful purposes. This use of the technique, to cause cells to manufacturer material that is harmful to the body, is not a therapy but instead an attack on it.
Gene therapy can and will save lives, but using the term for these destructive applications is going to give the process as bad an image or worse, that the PCR test has given the PCR process. In other words, it is the final intent of the process that they are saying is why it is NOT “gene therapy,” but “gene modication” instead.
Reply
Charles Higley
| #
Wrong, they are gene therapies.
Moderna was founded on the fact that RNA can be back transcribed naturally into our DNA. That is the basis of the company. Thus, Pfizer is the same as they are using the same technology
And, then, the AstraZeneca and J&J use DNA and adenovirus vectors which are an even more effective means to transfect DNA into the cell genome. It’s a much more effect form of gene therapy.
It is seriously wrong to even pretend these are not gene therapies. They truly are and should not be underestimated.
Reply
chris
| #
Let’s hope NOBODY is READING THIS BS here ANY MORE.. If Mike Yeadon does not know what synthetic MODmRNA really does, then I’m sorry Mike, GO BACK TO SCHOOL!!! The Pharma CARTEL, substack based (Kirsch, Malone, whoever this author is) are taking over this and many other ‘scientific resources’ only in order to further confuse. Just in case uneducated people really do read this stuff here, for TRUTH, go to :
https://mejbcart.substack.com/p/why-covid-injections-are-not-vaccines
and LEARN some BASICS, Smalley/
Reply
barry paul robinson
| #
Well said Chris, keep pumping the facts out, we need people like you.
Reply
Tom O
| #
Hmmm. You say he’s “pumping out facts?” I guess you are two of a kind.
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
Often one hears discussions about the nature of the COVID-19 vaccines, such as:
Is it a gene therapy, biologic, s-protein treatment, traditional pharmaceutical, mRNA, vaccine, or something else? It could be anything, everything, or maybe nothing. In fact, it is a fraud.
From the science or reality perspective, it is most likely a cocktail of some chemicals with one major declared, mRNA, a chemical compound.
As the detailed composition of such entities has not been disclosed (which should have been), it is safe to assume that all substances in vials would be “pure chemicals.” Further, they are most likely nonphysiological, i.e., the human body would not have them or require them for its natural functions; hence, many adverse effects (presumed and observed).
All claims and discussions about them can safely be considered mental gymnastics for escaping the science fraud that occurred in the name of advances in medical science.
On the other hand, all claims mentioned above relate to testing or interactions with the virus. However, one thing is sure, the virus and its interactions have never been studied because the virus does not exist—therefore, all claims and naming become false or lies.
There is no way out of this mess except to declare that fraud has occurred. The public has been fooled and deceived. Start with stopping the treatment/vaccination and ignoring “medical experts,” including those branding themselves now as non-virus or no-vaccine advocates. Unfortunately, their views and knowledge about substances (chemicals) are as shallow as virus and vaccine supporters. Instead, seek help from “outsiders” with training, knowledge, and research experience working with substances (chemicals), such as chemists.
Reply
barry paul robinson
| #
Well said Chris, keep pumping the facts out, we need people like you.
Reply