Covid Vaccines and Infertility
Germany reported a 13% decline in births between January and March 2022 compared to the same period in 2021.
The United Kingdom reported a 7.7% decline in births with 75,670 births between January and February 2022 compared to 82,042 births during the same period in 2021.
Switzerland
Taiwan
Igor Chudov, the author of a popular covid newsletter wrote, “When expressed in “sigmas”, units of standard deviation, the 23.24% drop in the birth rate in Taiwan is a 26-sigma event! This is can be described as “unimaginable” in terms of the likelihood of happening due to random chance.”
Sweden
The decline in birth rates is 6.9% for that same time period when compared to the average of 2019-2021.
Netherlands
In conclusion, data from around the world shows a substantial monthly decrease in birth rates from January 2022 to April 2022 compared to previous years.
Biodistribution studies show that Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine lipid nanoparticles do end up in the ovaries and testes and subsequent studies have shown that covid-19 and covid vaccines lower sperm counts.
Furthermore, the rate of fertility problems reported on the CDC’s VAERS database for the covid vaccines are astronomical.
Prior to the introduction of the mRNA vaccines, there were about 1,500 reports of fertility problems over the 31-year history of VAERS for all vaccines combined.
There are 15,000 reports of fertility issues from the covid vaccine alone, which accounts for 95% of all the fertility issues in the history of VAERS.
In the United Kingdom, there are more than 30,000 reports of menstrual changes after covid vaccinations.
Why are birth rates plummeting in the United Kingdom, Germany, Sweden, Netherlands, Switzerland, and Taiwan — nine months after the beginning of covid mass vaccinations?
Children are statistically at-or-near zero risk of being hospitalized or dying from covid-19.
The mass vaccination of children must stop now.
source: kanekoa.substack
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
K Kaiser
| #
Very disturbing news!
Reply
monkey*poops
| #
what’s even more disturbing is that people refuse to see that something is way off here!
can’t believe how easily hacked peoples brains are, embarrassing
Reply
Wisenox
| #
Doesn’t it strike anyone as odd that these types of articles keep being printed, yet the vaccine patents are NEVER mentioned?
The vaccines have no ingredient list, making the patents the only intelligent place to look, but they never do.
I’ll give an example:
If they are doing anything in the reproductive system, then its highly likely that they’re using the androgen receptors to enter the nucleus in the reproductive cells. Binding these with introduced agents will rob the body of its normal androgen receptor activity. The result of this alone would explain long covid (androgen deprivation). Once inside the nucleus, the patent holds the ability to silence, delete, replace or genetically modify any gene they want. If any modifications in the nucleus require excretion from the cell (needs to leave the cell), the patent includes the gene Chromosome 1 Open Reading Frame 134, which is a secretory peptide located in the 1p36.13 cytogenic band on chromosome 1. This area of chromosome 1 is where all of the 1P36 Deletion Syndrome diseases arise from, and it is noted repeatedly in literature that even the most minor of disturbances in the secretory signaling pathway cause systemic metabolic illnesses.
I could go on mentioning different aspects of the patent that would be involved and how they could contribute to reported side effects, but you get my point. The patents provide the answers and the information would be much more interesting to read in an article.
The fact that supposed news outlets continue to avoid any and all conversations about the patents tells you what side they’re on, and its not the people’s.
Reply