Covid Infection Fatality Rate for under 70s confirmed at 0.1%

If the very elderly had been protected and everyone else had carried on normally, COVID would have been defeated naturally within two months. Who knew?

To 4 decimal places, the age-stratified risk of death IF infected in the first place:

  • 0-19 years = ZERO
  • 20-29 years = ZERO
  • 30-39 years = 0.01 percent
  • 40-49 years = 0.04 percent
  • 50-59 years = 0.13 percent
  • 60-69 years = 0.50 percent
  • 0-69 years = 0.10 percent

94 percent of the global population is aged under 70.

These estimates are virtually unchanged from those made in early 2020.

So, yeah, we all knew. But only a few did anything about it.

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/joelsmalley_covid19-redpill-activity-6700870142118641664-PjT_

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/joelsmalley_covid19-coronavirus-activity-6664193891102785536-dKTo

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/joelsmalley_how-does-covid-19-compare-to-a-bad-flu-activity-6671135130746163201-dGE5

And this is even with the denial of life-saving early treatment.

#CanYouSeeItYet?

See more here substack.com

Header image: Cavernoma Alliance UK

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (3)

  • Avatar

    Tom

    |

    In other words, it just a flu and the severity depends on other bodily health factors.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Saeed Qureshi

    |

    Even this number is not correct.
    There is no scientific/experimental evidence showing that the virus exists. Hence, there cannot be COVID-19, so no one can die from it. Sorry!

    It is simply false information.
    (https://bioanalyticx.com/covid-deaths-as-per-science/).

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Greg Spinolae

    |

    WTF is “infection fatality rate”?
    Even if there WAS a reliable “test” for the “infection”; which there clearly is NOT, there are no reliable or consistent criteria for what constitutes a connection between this undefined “infection” and any “fatality” that may or may not be coincidental to the result of an unreliable “test” for an undefined agent.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via