“Covid-19 was an Act of Biological Warfare Perpetrated on the Human Race”
The EU Parliament held the International COVID-19 Summit III in Brussels, Belgium earlier this month
In a recent address to the European Parliament, a US businessman specializing in patent auditing; David Martin, claimed that COVID-19 was not a natural occurrence but a calculated act of “biological warfare and a financial heist. Nature was hijacked, science was hijacked.”
In his presentation in front of the EU parliament, Martin argued that the pandemic we said happened in the last few years did not overnight, citing sources in the public domain.
According to him, the coronavirus was first identified in 1965 and serves as a model pathogen. In addition, they learned that coronaviruses can be modified.
“But in 1966, the very first CoV coronavirus model was used as a transatlantic biological experiment in human manipulation. And you heard the date 1966.
I hope you’re getting the point of what I’m saying. This is not an overnight thing. This is actually something that’s been long in the making.
A year before I was born, we had the first transatlantic coronavirus data-sharing experiment between the United States and the United Kingdom.”
According to Martin, “Later we started learning how to modify a coronavirus by putting them in animals such as dogs and pigs,” and this led to the development of the first coronavirus spike protein vaccine by the US pharmaceutical giant Pfizer in 1990.
However, the medical community and pharmaceutical companies quickly learned that the vaccines were ineffective.
“Because the coronavirus is a malleable model, it mutates,” Martin said. “Every medical publication concluded that coronaviruses escape vaccines because it modifies and mutates too rapidly for a vaccine to be developed.”
More from the Standard:
In 2002, a university in North Carolina initiated a study to develop an “infectious replication defective,” which Martin interpreted as “a weapon to target individuals, but not have collateral damage.”
Characterizing the project as having “mysteriously preceded SARS by a year,” Martin said the coronavirus that caused the highly deadly infection was not from China and that it was “engineered” instead of naturally occurring.
On Covid-19, Martin said the coronavirus – named as SARS-CoV-2 by the World Health Organization – was poised for human emergence in 2016, with a preview about an “accidental or intentional release of a respiratory coronavirus” from a laboratory in Wuhan.
He said the purpose of the coronavirus “release” was to boost global acceptance on universal vaccination.
Explaining the common concern among the medical industry, Martin said: “Until an infectious crisis is very real, present and at the emergency threshold, it is often largely ignored.
“To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, we need to increase the public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures, such as the pan-influenza, or pan-coronavirus, vaccine. A key drive is the media and the economics will follow the hype.
“We [pharmaceutical firms] need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issue. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process,” he said.
Martin claimed that the United States “intentionally released” the Covid-19 coronavirus in Wuhan, China, with the goal of causing a global pandemic in order to increase public support for vaccines.
“This whole story started in 1965 when we decided to hijack a natural model and decide to start manipulating it. Science was hijacked when the only questions that could be asked were questions authorized under the patent protection of the CDC, the FDA, the NIH, and their equivalent organizations around the world,” he said.
See more here thegatewaypundit.com
Header image: Wallpaper Safari
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About Covid 19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
VOWG
| #
If nothing had been done it would have been no more deadly than the seasonal flu. The vaxxes and the processes were the goal and it was tremendously successful, more people are now being killed by the vaxxes than the whu who flu.
Reply
Alan
| #
It only became an act of warfare when people believed the lies and it required very little knowledge to interpret the available trial results. First, the governments educate us to be imbeciles and then they can do anything they want to us.
Reply
T. C. Clark
| #
A top Chinese scientist has finally admitted that the Covid virus may have come from the Wuhan Lab. USA is still funding the virus studies at the lab…..DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH. Viruses just want to find host cells to reproduce in and multiply and evolve…..if your body doesn’t respond well to the invasion – the virus doesn’t care.
Reply
Dean Jackson
| #
For the second time in under three years another vaccine for the common cold has been released by the FDA,(1) but medical science tells us there are no vaccines for any cold virus…
https://www.verywellhealth.com/why-there-will-never-be-a-vaccine-for-the-common-cold-770451
The latest ‘vaccine’ for a cold virus is for RSV(2)…
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-respiratory-syncytial-virus-rsv-vaccine
…but where’s the trumpets and accolades signifying victory over the decades-long quest for a cold vaccine? Where’s the medical science awards? Where’s the Nobel nomination? What’s with the media silence towards this great achievement in medical science?
(1) In case you missed it, the first cold “vaccine” was for COVID-19 back in late 2020, COVID-19 being a common cold coronavirus…
https://www.hhs.gov/coronavirus/index.html
(2) “What Is a Cold?
Colds are minor infections of the nose and throat caused by more than 200 different viruses. Rhinovirus is the most common cause, accounting for 10 to 40 percent of colds. Other common cold viruses include coronavirus and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).”
https://www.lung.org/lung-health-diseases/lung-disease-lookup/facts-about-the-common-cold#:~:text=Rhinovirus%20is%20the%20most%20common,respiratory%20syncytial%20virus%20(RSV)
Reply
Dean Jackson
| #
“But in 1966, the very first CoV coronavirus model…”
Model? Yes, not a real genome, but a man-made genome, because viruses don’t exist, instead exosomes exist, but if the genome from an exosome were used, that genome would identify human RNA/DNA…
“I have to expressly clarify that one cannot provide evidence in the classical sense in biology as one can in mathematics or physics. In biology one can only gather clues, which at some point in time in their entirety attain probative value.“ — Professor Andreas Podbielski, Virologist, University of Rostock, as quoted in his expert witness testimony at the 2014 ‘Measels trial’ at the Ravensburg Local Court.
The defendant, Dr. Stefan Lanka, responds to the shocking admission of a virologist that viruses don’t exist:
“Based on this extremely unscientific claim arising from Podbielski’s lack of arguments and his bias due to the discrepancies between reality and the beliefs he had grown so fond of, something happened which behavioural scientists call “displacement”. Podbielski invented a desperate excuse, namely that biology and the medicine based thereon as well as vaccinations are per se unscientific and without evidence, without proof: In his opinion, only a collection of clues could “some day” and “somehow” (practically) attain probative value. A more explicit admission of the existent unscientific nature of current biology and medicine has never been expressed with such clarity.”
“1. The fact of Alignment
Virologists have never isolated a complete
genetic strand of a virus and displayed it directly,
in its entire length. They always use very short
pieces of nucleic acids, whose sequence consists
of four molecules to determine them and call
them sequences. From a multitude of millions of
such specific, very short sequences, virologists
mentally assemble a fictitious long genome
strand with the help of complex computational
and statistical methods. This process is called
alignment.
The result of this complex alignment, the
fictitious and very long genetic strand, is
presented by virologists as the core of a virus
and they claim to have thus proven the
existence of a virus. However, such a complete
strand never appears in reality and in scientific
literature as a whole, although the simplest
standard techniques [Gel Electrophoresis*]
have long been available to
determine the length and composition of nucleic
acids simply and directly. By the fact of the
alignment, instead of presenting a nucleic acid
of the appropriate length directly, the virologists
have disproved themselves.
…
Alignment is only done by means
of mental constructs
In order to be able to mentally/computationally
assemble the very short sequences of the
nucleic acids used into a long genome, the
virologists need a template to align the short
sequences into a very long, supposedly viral
genome strand. Without such a given, very long
sequence, it is not possible for a virologist to
construct a viral genome
theoretically/computationally. Virologists argue
that the constructed genome is from a virus
because the alignment was done with another,
given viral genome.
This argument of the virologists is briefly and
unambiguously refuted by the fact that all
templates with which new genetic material
strands were generated
theoretically/computationally were themselves
and finally generated
theoretically/computationally and do not
originate from a virus.” – Dr. Stefan Lanka
The virus fraud needs some form of confirmation, however, and accomplishes this with PCR, and other diagnostic tools, that will naturally pick up the DNA/RNA signatures of humans, not viruses:
“The other decisive fact — not just for SARS or the corona crisis —
is that virologists, by assuming the existence of pathogenic viruses,
suppress for understandable reasons an underlying truth. The
current testing method tests for the presence of a specific genetic
material. However, the genetic sequences used as a “template” for
such tests have not been isolated from a virus. Scientists isolate typical
genetic sequences released by dying cells and tissues. These
generally short genetic sequences, components of human metabolic
processes, are the foundation of the subsequent laboratory work.
With the help of computer programs, virologists “conceptually” construct
a longer RNA or DNA strand out of the many isolated shorter
genetic sequences. These constructed RNA or DNA strands are then
claimed to be real viral strands. That is the reason why so many
healthy people end up testing positive again and again.” — Dr. Stefan Lanka
And what are these “typical genetic sequences released by dying cells” if not viruses? Exosomes:
“During the measles virus trial, I commissioned an independent laboratory to perform these control experiments and the result was that the tissues and cells die, due to the laboratory conditions, in the exact same way as when they come into contact with allegedly “infected” material. The entire purpose of control experiments is to exclude the possibility that it is the applied method or technique which may cause the result. Control experiments, then, are the highest duty in science and also the exclusive basis of claiming that one’s conclusion is scientific.”
Exosomes were ‘discovered’ in 1983, but incredulously virology conspired to not ask the obvious and critical question when they were ‘discovered’: Since 1954, when the virus hypothesis was accepted, has virology been confusing viruses for exosomes? The fact that this critical question was never asked, and negative control experiments finally conducted on viruses, proves not only the Marxist co-option of our medical institutions, but all institutions, otherwise such a massive and pervasive fraud couldn’t have been mounted, the purpose of the fraud being the Human Extinction Event we’re currently experiencing with mRNA poisons:
Since vaccines are for the healthy, not the sick, then the use of Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA’s) for vaccines identifies the Satanist co-option of our institutions,1 knowingly releasing poisons onto humanity, otherwise, of course, no sane individual would desire to accidentally destroy humanity with a vaccine that turned out to be deadly…quod erat demonstrandum.
It’s one thing to provide an EUA for those who are already sick and in imminent course for death. The patient is going to die soon, so if the patient chooses, he/she can decide to take the chance on the new potentially dangerous treatment. This scenario, however, cannot be transferred to humanity without the risk of eviscerating humanity.
Addendum
The CDC was informed in 2010 that its vaccine reporting system only captured less than 1% of adverse events:
“…fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. Low reporting rates preclude or slow the identification of “problem” drugs and vaccines that endanger public health.”
When the CDC was informed of this scandal, “…the CDC consultants responsible for receiving data were no longer responsive to our multiple requests to proceed with testing and evaluation”, thereby identifying the Satanist co-option of our institutions, where poisons masquerade as beneficial medical treatments. To date approximately 30,000 deaths due to COVID-19 vaccines have been reported to CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Since less than 1% of adverse events are recorded by VAERS, that places the true COVID-19 vaccine death count at approximately 3 million. Also reported to VAERS are 249,116 serous injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and July 29, 2022. Since less than 1% of adverse events are recorded by VAERS, that places the true COVID-19 vaccine serious injury count at approximately 24,911,600.
Reply
Dean Jackson
| #
Addendum
Link to 2010 study submitted to The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, detailing VAERS poor capture of vaccine injuries, and providing fixes…
https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf
Reply