COVID-19: A Very Different Truth
Anyone who spends any sort of time on social media can’t have missed the increasingly frequent disagreements that have bloomed over the threat posed by the Covid-19 virus.
Debate, it seems, has begun to fall into two distinct camps: those who consume and then regurgitate the ‘facts’ as told to the world at large by the UK and other governments; and those whose hunger for knowledge on the subject has led them to other sources of the truth.
One of the scientists regularly quoted in these frequently heated social media exchanges is Dr Mike Yeadon whose public debunking of much of the data being peddled in support of what many consider to be Draconian anti-Covid measures was widely reported in the UK media in the late summer.
Many critics of Dr Yeadon denounced the evidence he presented on the basis that he was a former Chief Scientific Officer with pharmaceutical giant Pfizer – the same company that manufactured the vaccine currently being rolled out to frontline workers and the vulnerable.
His professional associations aside – none of which should really have any bearing on his reputation as a scientist, by the way – it is hard to ignore the weight of the evidence that his work offers.
Dr Yeadon is one of 22 scientists who make up the International Consortium of Scientists in Life Science (ICSLS) which has released compelling data to prove the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test – widely used around the world diagnose Covid-19 infection – is ‘fatally flawed’.
At the end of November, the ICSLS called on an organisation called Eurosurveillance to withdraw its study in support of the protocols that are used in the PCR test.
The study – known as the Corman-Drosten paper – was published in January this year, just one day after it was submitted.
Quite apart from raising serious questions about the integrity of what is considered to be the shortest scientific peer review in history, it also raises serious questions about the motivation for fast-tracking its publication.
The ICSLS says its own research proves the PCR test – the test, remember, upon which every single piece of the government’s increasingly dictatorial anti-Covid strategy is based – is all but completely useless and says it makes a nonsense of Eurosurveillance’s January study.
The most significant of the 10 fatal flaws in the PCR test, according to a report by respected science journalist Peter Andrews, include:
- Non-specificity due to erroneous design, meaning it is not accurate in determining evidence of a specific covid strain;
- Test results are enormously variable
- An inability to differentiate between virus fragments and whole virus
- It has no positive or negative controls
- It has no standard operating procedure – meaning that even if you disregard the accuracy of the test itself, results are not consistent with each other due to variable application protocols
Obviously, there is a great deal of hard science that sits behind the ICSLS findings, but in a nutshell what it means is that the test returns an astonishingly high number of false positive results – estimated by some to be as great as 97%.
The extent of the disingenuity of the original January paper becomes clearer when you learn that, according to Peter Andrews’ report, at least three of its authors are allegedly on the payroll of the first companies to win the PCR testing contracts.
So, what does this mean to you and me? In essence the biggest impact on our everyday lives is that we are living under stringent restrictive measures that have been informed by poor science with no credible basis in fact.
It also lends weight to Yeadon’s own views that much of the country had achieved herd immunity as early as the summer and that the virus is on the wane, not on the rise. It also lends credence to data that shows mortality rates during November of this year were actually lower than in the same period five years previously.
More than that, though, it also raises another question which is about the extent of the virus itself.
As Peter Andrews concludes at the end of his report, it is far more likely that we are seeing a pseudo-pandemic that bears no relation to the supposed ‘truth’ the government and its narrow church of scientific advisers would have us believe.
I have written previously on the power of Vitamins C and D in helping to combat covid infection naturally, and you can read more on that here and here.
Use these links to read the full January paper from Eurosurveillance and also find out more about ICSLS and its own review of the Corman-Drosten report.
There is a wealth of evidence and data out there relating to Covid-19 and the basis on which government strategy is based – we all just need to be interested enough to look for it and then question what we are being told by a government which seems disinclined to take advice from a wide body of expertise.
Read more at thenaturaldoctor.org
About the author: Dr Nyjon Eccles is one of the most respected Integrated Medicine physicians in the UK and has been at the forefront in the use of pioneering, innovative and ground breaking natural healthcare over the last decade.
He holds a raft of medical and academic qualifications, including the MBBS, and is a Member of the Royal College of Physicians (MRCP). He also holds a PhD in Pharmacology (London).
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Trackback from your site.
Brian James
| #
It would be great if America had a real free press with folks who would question everything. Then I snap out of that pipe dream.
January 20, 2021 Survey on Pandemic’s Impact on Autism Families
The previous eight years did us no favors. I’m not entirely sure that’s a bad thing. Red or blue – no one in Washington has ever sought to really help the autism community.
https://www.ageofautism.com/2021/01/survey-on-pandemics-impact-on-autism-families.html#comments
Reply
Charles Higley
| #
“Obviously, there is a great deal of hard science that sits behind the ICSLS findings, but in a nutshell what it means is that the test returns an astonishingly high number of false positive results – estimated by some to be as great as 97%.”
Better yet, the PCR test is NOW 100% wrong as there is no evidence that the supposed virus is still here. The test is so nonspecific that it is picking up the viruses of the new flu season. As C-19, or whatever group of viruses might have caused C-19 syndrome, came and went with the previous flu season, it is ingenuous to pretend that it is still around. The flashlight they are using to see the virus is broad-beamed and totally misleading.
They are even now claiming that C-19 has mutated to be a 24 or 48-hour flu-type disease. However, this is simply pointing at a current flu-type virus and claiming it’s C-19, with no evidence whatsoever because it has never been properly isolated and cultured. The fact is that C-19 is gone if it ever existed. It’s like the wolf is gone but now they are pointing at dogs because they have teeth like a wolf. It’s just dumb.
Reply
Marilyn Shepherd
| #
So called covid is a cold, some get sick, most don’t, it’s common garden variety nothing much and I said that on day 1. There is a massive amount of butt covering anti science chicanery being peddled by frauds to get control of populations and enrich big pharma and Bill Gates. No matter where we look Gates is in the forefront and this is dangerous as hell.
Reply
Ken Hughes
| #
Congratulations to the author. The more professional people who get on the back of Dr. Yeadon’s stand against this GLOBAL stupidity, the better. Remember, this is GLOBAL and not just confined to the UK. It’s a pity the article focused on UK policy only.
But then, if you acknowledge this, then you are forced to conclude there must be a REAL global conspiracy and not just some “theory” of it. How else could all the western nations adopt exactly the same approach and proceed in policy “lockstep”. The “designers” of this scam knew exactly what they were doing when they drew the nations into signing up to the biddings of the WHO and the world bank.
Control of our “elected representatives has been stolen from us with what must be promises of great riches and seats at the globalist’s table. Our politicians have sold their souls and our freedoms down the river, along with them.
Reply
Binra
| #
“Anyone who spends any sort of time on social media can’t have missed the increasingly frequent disagreements that have bloomed over the threat posed by the Covid-19 virus.”
What about those who did not and not regard the ‘novel virus’ a a real or present danger ie NOT a threat? But who see the reaction generated by a lockstepped Media as the basis of actual threats operating in the name of covid-19 – which are all either reactions, treatments and measures imposed or inculcated on or in the minds of people, or all kinds of non actions to actual disease or destructive agenda included in the umbrella term of covid-19.
There are those who swallow the narrative and those who push it for political or private gain, then there are those who are invested in some facets of it but not others, and who therefore question only those facets they disagree with – such as treatments, social measures or lack of transparency and accountability from anyone in positions of authority and trust.
If you go back to beginning of THIS particular and weaponised version of an oft repeated trick, you have the PR for the discovery of a ‘novel’? virus – NOT being subject to scrutiny.
Which makes NO claim to causing any disease.
You have the miraculous publication of Dr Drostren’s paper setting the basis for the primers for the PCR testing that will be used to support the ‘Covid Plague’. NOT being subject to scrutiny.
We all saw and see an unprecedented Media blitz that has not stopped but is intent on generating a ‘reality’ regardless and against facts. Narrative DICTATE.
We saw and see a global reaction of withdrawal of freedoms and imposition of always increasing regulatory impositions set against the core of human relational values and freedom of movement and association.
The use of the guilt accusing polarised demonising of any real questioning is precisely as the means to lock down and distance the mind capture from its source of healing.
Reply
Marilyn Shepherd
| #
So called covid is a cold, some get sick, most don’t, it’s common garden variety nothing much and I said that on day 1. There is a massive amount of butt covering anti science chicanery being peddled by frauds to get control of populations and enrich big pharma and Bill Gates. No matter where we look Gates is in the forefront and this is dangerous as hell.
Reply