Claim: Climate Engineering Causing Drought & Earthquakes

About a month ago, climate engineering researcher Dane Wigington said the severe drought unfolding in the Western United States is only going to get worse.  It has.  Now, large portions of the Western U.S are being hit with earthquakes.  Wigington contends that science shows the rash of earthquakes in the West are linked to climate engineering.

One example is the earthquake in Fukushima in 2011.  The science is backed up by a report from MIT.  Wigington explains, “All this data is extremely verifiable.  The testimony from MIT is extraordinarily damming.  Their words were ‘extremely anomalous heating directly above the epicenter in the days prior to the quake.’ . . . The Fukashima meltdown was not intended, but when you trigger seismic activity on that scale, massive consequences happen. . . .

The ability to cause seismic activity with radio frequency microwave transmissions is very well documented scientifically. . . . There is no official source that is willing to discuss this because it is simply too alarming to the population.   The liability issues from decimating food supplies and tripping seismic activity is incomprehensible.  When people find out what is being done to them, I would argue that’s when they take to the streets with their proverbial pitchforks and torches to look for anyone and everyone involved.”

The so-called “Mega-Drought” in the Western U.S is being caused by climate engineering.  Wigington says, “We know conclusively that in the case of cutting off the flow of moisture in the U.S. West is absolutely the result of climate engineering operations—period. . . . They are cutting off the food supply. . . .Food supply is collapsing. . . .We have climate engineering completely derailing crop production, and it’s not just in the U.S. West, but in multiple locations around the world.

Wigington points out that Europe is in a severe drought “that is worse than anything in the last 2,100 years,” and yet very little is being reported about it.  He says this, too, is a product of climate engineering.

Wigington says great public awareness is what is needed to stop what is being done to the planet with climate engineering.

Wigington says, “This is a very direct fight for life . . . . Going back to how we started this interview, the decimation of our food supplies is going to be very visible in the coming weeks and months.  No matter what other challenges we face, if we don’t deal with this one, the planet’s life support systems right down to our food supply, nothing else will matter.  This needs to be seen by our military brothers and sisters.  They need to understand that they are waging all-out weather and biological warfare against their own populations.  That’s a fact.

See more here: usawatchdog.com

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

 

 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (7)

  • Avatar

    Jack Bean.

    |

    The problem I see is that some earthlings truly believe that mankind has the awesome power of the creator.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Dr. John H

    |

    Why would they do this?

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Brian James

    |

    Weather is not climate! This most certainly has an influence I am sure.

    Apr 22, 2021 Japan prepares groundwork for discharging Fukushima water into sea

    It could take 30 years for Japan to fully release treated water from the Fukushima nuclear plant into the sea. That is the timeline for the plant to be fully decommissioned.

    https://youtu.be/cIEsCcLw16g

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Jerry Krause

      |

      Hi Brian and hopefully other PSI Readers,

      Chemists of the past often stated: “DILUTION is the SOLUTION!!! And I still do, for THERE IS NO AWAY!!!

      Have a good day, Jerry

      Reply

  • Avatar

    SAM

    |

    I wish someone would weigh-in on some of the odd weather patterns seen in the last five years. When did we see two high pressure areas sit next to each other? When did low or high pressure areas traverse from east to west over the continental US? When did we ever see a high pressure system sit over the four-points area and wobble like a broom balanced on the palm of a hand? I was born and raised here in California, and never saw these things in the weather reports until the last five years.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Jerry Krause

      |

      Hi Sam,

      I’m not familiar with pressure areas you reference for I live at 45N latitude at Salem OR where atmospheric soundings are launched and I watch jet streams and clouds as well as air temperatures. And I try to consider the historical data which goes back for more than 40 years.

      Weather is so variable from day to day, month to month, season to season, year to year that I, because I am old, I can remember well enough to pick up on the cyclic ‘weather’ that I believe is occurring in the midst of all this variability.

      The biggest problem is you are one of the few that actually consider the observed factors which are being measured as you and I are trying to do

      Have a good day, Jerry

      Reply

    • Avatar

      Jerry Krause

      |

      Hi Sam,

      Today’s article (https://principia-scientific.com/lake-mead-plunges-to-record-low-amid-drought-pocalypse/) draws our attention to a climatic record which cannot be questioned. For it includes a figure showing year by year water levels of Lake Mead which filled to its average level in 3 years after Hoover Dam became ‘active’ in 1935 when the USA was in a midst of an economic depression.

      A better figure (https://arachnoid.com/NaturalResources/) to study is the larger figure of this site. Two things which should not be over looked are the general magnitudes of the seasonal oscillation of the level up to 1965 and the obvious decrease of level which occurred in the three years after 1952 to 1955 and the equally equally rapid rebound to an above average level by 1958. Of course, there is other interesting things which need consideration relative to NATURAL CLIMATE CHANGE.

      However, this comment is just to direct your and other possible PSI Readers’ attentions to this historical data which cannot be questioned.

      Have a good day, Jerry

      Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via