Christian Drosten & the Fraud Behind COVID 19 PCR Testing

The German virologist Professor Dr. Christian Drosten is THE face of the current corona crisis! The weekly magazine Stern even ran the headline in March 2020: “The coronavirus has made virologist Christian Drosten the most sought-after man in the Republic, and a star.”[1]

For it was Christian Drosten who developed the PCR Corona test in January 2020, which from then on served as the standard method for detecting the Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 worldwide. As Director of the Berlin Charité Institute, he is a very influential advisor to the German government and participated as an expert in many government press conferences.

Thus, through his assessments, he also significantly influenced far-reaching political decisions, such as the compulsory wearing of masks, the suspension of regular school lessons, or the closure of the entire catering industry.

Out of a series of awards, the Federal Cross of Merit on Ribbon in 2005 and the Federal Cross of Merit 1st Class in 2020 stand out.

In this program, however, a file in four parts is shared, which shows a completely different face of Christian Drosten and throws light on his hardly known background:

“The Drosten File” Part 1: Christian Drosten and his mis-predictions

Due to Drosten’s awards, one should expect that his assessments and forecasts will be accurate. Here are just two examples of his always worrying forecasts compared with actual developments:

Forecast 1: 2003 / SARS

“If the epidemic cannot be pushed back in the near future, there may be repeated cases of SARS.[…] If outbreaks of such pulmonary diseases were to occur regularly in certain countries, it could have a serious impact on their economies. An effective vaccine cannot be expected for at least one to two years.”

Actual development: According to the WHO, since the beginning of the so-called SARS epidemic in 2003, there have been only 8,096 SARS cases worldwide with 774 deaths; in Germany, only 9 cases occurred and not a single death.
Forecast 2: 2009 / Swine flu

“The disease is a serious common viral infection that produces significantly more severe side effects than anyone can imagine from the worst vaccine.”

Although there was no reliable data on numbers of cases, Drosten urged people to get vaccinated against swine flu.

Actual development: The predicted epidemic never occurred. Nevertheless, vaccines were ordered by Western governments for several hundred million euros, but the vast majority of the population rejected them despite Drosten’s urgent recommendation. Moreover, the vaccines caused far more serious damage than the swine flu itself.

Conclusion: Drosten’s scary forecasts, which always aimed at the “standard solution; vaccination”, turned out to be fatal misjudgements resulting in gigantic economic damage.

How is it possible that he continues to appear credible as THE advisor to the government with these repeated horror predictions?

“The Drosten File” Part 2: Christian Drosten and his doctoral degree

As Prof. Dr. Christian Drosten became probably the best-known scientist in Germany as a result of the Corona crisis, there were also increasing questions about his doctoral thesis.

Strange inconsistencies came to light:

1st inconsistency:

Drosten allegedly received his doctorate from Frankfurt’s Goethe University in 2003. Surprisingly, however, the Frankfurt University Library was initially unable to provide a single copy of his thesis.
2nd inconsistency:

When asked by Dr. Markus Kühbacher, a scientist specializing in scientific fraud, the university’s press spokesman stated that the copies had been damaged during a flood. According to Kühbacher, the press spokesman later had to admit that he had “communicated false factual claims to him regarding Mr. Drosten’s dissertation.” The German National Library also did not have a single copy before 2020. This is normally mandatory for doctoral theses.
3rd inconsistency:

It is also very strange that in the catalogue of the German National Library – in which all university publications must be listed – no entry for Christian Drosten can be found for the years 2000-2003.
4th inconsistency:

On October 15, 2020, The Goethe University in Frankfurt am Main published a statement of correction regarding the “False allegations about the doctoral procedure of Prof. Dr. Christian Drosten”. This shows that Mr. Drosten has been entitled to use the title Dr. med. since September 4, 2003.

This is very surprising, because in a WHO document he is already listed as a Dr. in April 2003 – five months earlier.

These and other numerous inconsistencies prompted the lawyer Dr. Reiner Füllmich to refer to Drosten as the “Captain of Köpenick” [in German history, a legendary imposter] in the extra-parliamentary Corona Investigation Committee.

On December 2, 2020, Kühbacher filed a lawsuit with the Regional Court of Stuttgart regarding the “deposit copies of Mr. Drosten’s dissertation and their alleged storage in excessively moist conditions. These legal proceedings could bring further spicy inconsistencies to light.

However, things could get even more unpleasant for Drosten, as Dr. Füllmich has already filed an initial claim for damages against Drosten on behalf of one of his clients who suffered financial loss as a result of the Corona measures. A class action lawsuit in the USA is in preparation.

Ultimately, it is not about his doctorate, but about the question of Christian Drosten’s credibility. Why has he persistently remained silent for months and not clarified these serious allegations without reservation? This is certainly not conducive to his credibility.

“The Drosten File” Part 3: Christian Drosten and his PCR Test

The PCR test for the detection of the SARS-CoV-2 virus developed by Drosten in January 2020 at lightning speed is “the test of the year”! These test results are the legitimation for national governments worldwide to enforce the most massive restrictions of fundamental rights against citizens!

As recently as 2014, Drosten said of this PCR test method: “The method is so sensitive that it can detect a single hereditary molecule of this virus. If such a pathogen, for example, flits across a nurse’s nasal mucosa for a day without her getting sick or noticing anything else, she is suddenly a MERS case. Where previously, people at death’s door were reported, now mild cases and even people without symptoms are suddenly included in the reporting statistics. This could also explain the explosion in the number of cases in Saudi Arabia. On top of this, the local media have made an incredible fuss about it.”

Doesn’t this quote from Drosten accurately reflect the current Corona situation?

“Reporting statistics suddenly include perfectly healthy people and distort them.”

“Explosion in case numbers.”

“The Media is exaggerating things beyond belief.”

This begs the question; Did Drosten design this PCR protocol in order to trigger a “case-demic”?

A recent scientific research paper by 22 top-class scientists substantiates this suspicion, as they have refuted the scientific basis of the Drosten study, which served as the test protocol adopted by the WHO.

Also, initial court decisions have confirmed the unscientific nature of the Drosten study and his PCR test.

With his unscientific study and the unfit-for-purpose test based on it, this one man has significantly steered the entire Corona scenario: Christian Drosten – Not only he himself, but also the test he developed proves to be implausible upon close examination.

“The Drosten File” Part 4: Christian Drosten and his manifold entanglements

A decisive indicator for the credibility of scientists is their neutrality and impartiality.

1. Is Drosten’s neutrality and impartiality even possible – given his connection to Olfert Landt?

Olfert Landt is one of the regular co-authors of Drosten’s studies – including the current Corona test publication. He is also the owner of the Berlin biotech company TIB Molbiol Syntheselabor GmbH, which produces Corona PCR tests. Drosten and Landt have apparently discovered a successful “business model”: in the case of pandemics and the most diverse viral outbreaks, they jointly develop a PCR test for them: this was already the case in 2002/2003 for SARS, in 2011 for EHEC, in 2012 for MERS, in 2016 for the Zika virus, in 2017 for yellow fever.

It is always the same trick, which they have now resorted to again for the Corona panic. Landt also admitted this to the Berliner Zeitung: “The test, the design, the development, came from the Charité. We just immediately converted that into a kit format. When you don’t have the virus, which was initially only available in Wuhan, we can make a synthetic gene [i.e. using computer modelling] to simulate the virus genome. We did that very quickly.”

Right at the start of the Corona crisis, Landt and his Berlin-based biotech company were producing Corona test kits for 1,500,000 Corona tests per week, and by February they had already tripled their sales.

In the meantime, he has probably reaped gigantic profits from these tests. It is somehow doubtful that Landt will pocket the entire economic success and that Drosten will only benefit in his reputation.

Regardless of the extent to which Drosten derived personal benefit from this, the question arises as to how it can be that developments are pushed forward with public funds and subsequently private companies profit from them to such an extent?

2. is Drosten’s neutrality and impartiality even possible – given his connections to the pharmaceutical industry?

Drosten received, among other things:

  • the “Förderpreis für Klinische Infektiologie”, sponsored by Aventis Deutschland Pharma GmbH and endowed with 5,000 euros,
  • the “Diagnostics Award of the European Society for Clinical Virology” of the US pharmaceutical company Abbott Laboratories, which is endowed with 2,500 euros and is associated with further interesting privileges for the award winner, and
  • via Charité Berlin, of which Drosten is the Institute Director, was in receipt of around $335,000 from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in December 2019 and March 2020. This foundation is by no means altruistic, but is known for its proximity to the vaccine industry.

Do these awards and grants create conflicts of interest that in the past led him to always promote vaccination as a way out?

The current crisis also seems to substantiate this suspicion, as Drosten himself does not shy away from an unlawful violation of the professional code of conduct of the state medical association by recommending certain vaccine manufacturers.

Therefore, don’t Drosten’s statements and studies have to be completely re-evaluated from the perspective of bias? Who would believe a scientist who propagates smoking as harmless and at the same time receives awards and funds from the tobacco industry?

CONCLUSIONS:

Fatal mispredictions, numerous unexplained inconsistencies regarding his doctoral thesis, a hastily developed “SARS-CoV-2 PCR test” with fundamental scientific flaws, and an unsuspected quagmire of financial entanglements, deprive Christian Drosten of any credibility.

If the central key figure in the entire Corona crisis turns out to be untrustworthy upon closer examination, then this raises serious questions:

  1. On the basis of this unscientific foundation, must not the entire Corona events with the inevitable threat of economic and financial collapse of entire nations finally be investigated for those pulling the strings and profiteers in the background?
  2. Might it not therefore amount to a staged takeover and even lead to the introduction of digital surveillance of entire nations under the pretext of fighting a pandemic?
  3. Why do the mass media responsible for critical reporting fail to reveal the “Drosten file”, why do they keep it under wraps?

Dear viewers,

Do you also think that these background facts should be known to everyone? Then help to bring the “Drosten file” to the light of day without delay.

Only a movement of the people itself can ensure that the silence of the monopoly controlled mainstream media is broken and a public discussion occurs!

You can contribute to this by making these hidden connections public! Therefore, spread this enlightening video! Inform as many of your acquaintances as possible by mail, via WhatsApp, Twitter, Vimeo or post the video on Facebook. We fade in the link to this broadcast!


Supplementary Material and Background Information

Short video (English subtitles) of Drosten taking a question from journalist Boris Reit-Schuster in a Press Conference on 20.1.2021

Drosten Press Conference from Howard Steen on Vimeo.

https://vimeo.com/504189129

Link to the ‘Corman-Drosten Reiew Report of 22 scientists referred to in the TV broadcast

www.cornamdrostenreview.com

from kw./str.

Sources/Links:

General info about Christian Drosten

https://www.stern.de/p/plus/gesundheit-wissenschaft/der-aufklaerer–so-wurde-christian-drosten-zum-wichtigsten-mann-deutschlands-9184616.html

https://www.deutschland.de/de/topic/wissen/christian-drosten-corona-forscher-und-regierungsberater

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Drosten#Ehrungen

Part 1: Christian Drosten and his mispredictions

1. SARS

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/biuz.200390097

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/biuz.200390097

https://www.who.int/csr/sars/country/table2004_04_21/en/

2. Swine Flu

https://www.kma-online.de/aktuelles/panorama/detail/zweite-welle-hat-begonnen-tote-erwartet-a-18682

https://www.spiegel.de/gesundheit/diagnose/schweinegrippe-impfstoff-pandemrix-risiken-wurden-ignoriert-a-1229144.html

Part 2: Christian Drosten and his doctorate

https://www.corodok.de/drosten-dissertation-verschluss/

https://mobile.twitter.com/Kuehbacher/status/1331958955757740033

https://plagiatsgutachten.com/blog/christian-drosten/

https://aktuelles.uni-frankfurt.de/aktuelles/falschbehauptungen-zum-promotionsverfahren-von-prof-dr-christian-drosten/

http://web.archive.org/web/20030423125938/https://www.who.int/csr/sars/2003_04_16/en/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSLgvxQNano

https://t.me/ReinerFuellmich/88

https://www.fuldaerzeitung.de/panorama/corona-luege-reiner-fuellmich-virologe-christian-drosten-lothar-wieler-rki-goettingen-anwalt-lockdown-90096522.html

https://twitter.com/Kuehbacher/status/1334065538834849794

Part 3: Christian Drosten and his PCR corona test

https://www.wiwo.de/technologie/forschung/virologe-drosten-im-gespraech-2014-die-who-kann-nur-empfehlungen-aussprechen/9903228-2.html

www.kla.tv/17757

www.kla.tv/17643

www.kla.tv/17530

Part 4: Christian Drosten and his manifold entanglements

http://www.laborjournal-archiv.de/epaper/LJ_20_04/43/#zoom=z

https://www.dzif.de/de/zika-und-chikungunya-viren-die-tuecken-der-diagnostik

https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/23/11/17-1131_article

https://www.berliner-zeitung.de/gesundheit-oekologie/fuer-panikkaeufe-ist-unsere-firma-zu-klein-li.79753

https://www.dw.com/de/corona-tests-maschinen-auf-hochtouren/a-52853100

https://taz.de/Produzent-von-Corona-Tests/!5671485/

https://www.ndr.de/nachrichten/info/16-Coronavirus-Update-Wir-brauchen-Abkuerzungen-bei-der-Impfstoffzulassung,podcastcoronavirus140.html

https://www.genexpress.de/de/projekte.html

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Drosten#Ehrungen

https://www.aerzteblatt.de/archiv/43328/Verleihungen

https://www.escv.eu/awards/the-abbott-diagnostic-award/

https://www.gatesfoundation.org/How-We-Work/Quick-Links/Grants-Database/Grants/2019/12/INV-004308

https://www.gatesfoundation.org/How-We-Work/Quick-Links/Grants-Database/Grants/2020/03/INV-005971

https://corona-transition.org/irrefuhrende-werbung-falschaussagen-prof-drosten-verstosst-gegen-berufsordnung

Reference: to programs that have already been broadcast: (not a must, only if required)

www.kla.tv/17757

www.kla.tv/17530

www.kla.tv/17643

Read more at enformtk.u-aizu.ac.jp

The above post is a working translation by Saji Hameed, Howard Steen and Paul Charles Gregory (DeepL with corrections) of narration in the KLA TV broadcast: https://www.kla.tv/17877


Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.

Trackback from your site.

Comments (5)

  • Avatar

    Luís Rodrigues-Coelho

    |

    He didn’t develop it in Jan 2020; already in 2015 Richard of Rothschild was investing in a system and method for testing for Covid-19 [Google image it]. In 2017 this PCR test already had a patent.
    Understand that all this was planned years in advance and they practiced it several times: 2001 “dark winter”, 2010 Rockeffeler Foundation white “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development”, 2017 “SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028” organized by the John Hopkins university, 2018 “Clad X”, sept 2019 “A World at Risk” by the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board and again John Hopkins oct 2019 “Event 201”.
    I also recommend you read 2001 NASA slide presentation [240] “Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare” given by the then CIA director. Ask yourselves what NASA has to do with psyops, brain projects, smart dust sprayed in the skies which end up in lungs which cause pathologies, microwave radiation and energy weapons and a lot more. Read the very last slide, how they knew that even if people hot to know about this presentation they wouldn’t believe since it look too far-fetched!
    C19 and the Great Reset are part of the same global agenda which is gradually building a global dictatorship; part of the Jewish/communist UN Agenda 21, recently renamed “2030 Goals”!

    Reply

  • Avatar

    very old white guy

    |

    Drosten is just one of many very dangerous people in the world.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Charles Higley

    |

    I would love to know how this correlates with the patenting of a “Covid-19 Test” back in 2015 by a Rockefeller. Is Drosten basically cover for the development of this test in a supposedly timely manner, masking its original production for the Pandemic? A sacrificial lamb for when the fallacies and inaccuracies of the PCR test are discovered and revealed?

    Reply

    • Avatar

      JaKo

      |

      Hi Charles,
      There has been a “murmur” among experts since the spring of 2020, even a very revealing November 2020 Paper appeared, yet the neck of this supposedly Sacrificial Lamb is still intact…
      Explanation?
      One obvious one = there’s much more behind these “Lambs” than meets the eye.
      Hint: Why aren’t we in a deep recession by now?
      Cheers, JaKo

      Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via