CDC/FDA confess they had no virus they created the test for
The CDC has issued a document that bulges with interesting and devastating admissions.
The release is titled, “07/21/2021: Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing.” [1] It begins explosively:
“After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.”
Many people believe this means the CDC is giving up on the PCR test as a means of “detecting the virus.”
I don’t think the CDC is saying that at all.
They’re saying the PCR technology will continue to be used, but they’re replacing what the test is looking FOR with a better “reference sample.” A better marker. A better target. A better piece of RNA supposedly derived from SARS-CoV-2.
CDC/FDA are confessing there has been a PROBLEM with the PCR test which has been used to detect the virus, starting in February of 2020—right up to this minute.
In other words, the millions and millions of “COVID cases” based on the PCR test in use are all suspect.
To confirm this, the CDC document links to an FDA release titled, “SARS-CoV-2 Reference Panel Comparative Data.” [2] [2a] Here is a killer quote:
“During the early months of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical specimens [of the virus] were not readily available to developers of IVDs [in vitro diagnostics] to detect SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, the FDA authorized IVDs based on available data from contrived samples generated from a range of SARS-CoV-2 material sources (for example, gene specific RNA, synthetic RNA, or whole genome viral RNA) for analytical and clinical performance evaluation. While validation using these contrived specimens provided a measure of confidence in test performance at the beginning of the pandemic, it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.”
Translation: We, at the CDC, did not have a specimen of the SARS-CoV-2 virus when we concocted the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2.
Yes, it’s unbelievable, right?
And that’s the test we’ve been using all along. So we CONTRIVED samples of the virus.
We fabricated. We lied. We made up [invented] synthetic gene sequences and we SAID these sequences HAD TO BE close to the sequence of SARS-CoV-2, without having the faintest idea of what we were doing, because, again, we didn’t have an actual specimen of the virus.
We had no proof there was something called SARS-CoV-2.
This amazing FDA document goes to say the Agency has granted emergency approval to 59 different PCR tests since the beginning of the (fake) pandemic. 59. And, “…it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.”
Translation: Each of the 59 different PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 told different lies and concocted different fabrications about the genetic makeup of the virus—the virus we didn’t have. Obviously, then, these tests would give unreliable results.
BUT, don’t worry, be happy, because NOW, the CDC and the FDA say, they really do have actual virus samples of SARS-CoV-2 from patients; they have better targets for the PCR test, and labs should start gearing up for the new and improved tests.
In other words, they were lying THEN, but they’re not lying NOW.
They were “contriving,” but now they’re telling the truth.
If you believe that, I have Fountain of Youth water for sale, extracted from the lead-contaminated system of Flint, Michigan.
Here, once again, I report virology’s version of “we isolated the virus”: [[3] thru [3i]]
They have a soup they make in their labs.
This soup contains human and monkey cells, toxic chemicals and drugs, and all sorts of other random genetic material. Because the cells start to die, the researchers ASSUME a bit of mucus from a patient they dropped in the soup is doing the killing, and the virus must be the killer agent in the mucus.
This assumption is entirely unwarranted. The drugs and chemicals could be doing the cell-killing, and the researchers are also starving the cells of vital nutrients.
There is no proof that SARS-CoV-2 is in the soup, or that it is doing the cell-killing, or that it exists.
Yet the researchers call cell-death “isolation of the virus.”
To say this is a non-sequitur is a vast understatement. In their universe, “We have the virus buried in a soup in a dish in the lab” equals, “We’ve separated the virus from all surrounding material.”
Virology equals “how to spread bullshit for a living and scare the world.” Other than that, it’s perfect.
SOURCES:
[1] https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-2_Testing_1.html
[2] https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/coronavirus-covid-19-and-medical-devices/sars-cov-2-reference-panel-comparative-data
[2a] https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2020/fda_updates_the_sars-cov-2_reference_panel_comparative_data.html
[3] blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/12/18/sars-cov-2-has-not-been-proven-to-exist/
[3a] blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/01/26/sars-cov-2-has-not-been-proven-to-exist-shocking/
[3b] blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/04/21/isolation-of-sars-cov-2-refuted-in-step-by-step-analysis-of-claim/
[3c] blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/04/26/the-non-existent-virus-and-the-implications/
[3d] blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/05/20/the-pandemic-virus-that-doesnt-exist/
[3e] blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/05/21/more-on-the-coronavirus-that-doesnt-exist-and-the-pink-demon/
[3f] blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/05/31/wuhan-lab-bioweapon-gain-of-function-but-the-virus-doesnt-exist/
[3g] andrewkaufmanmd.com
[3h] drtomcowan.com
[3i] greatreject.org/dr-stefan-lanka-claims-about-viruses-are-false
See more here: nomorefakenews.com
Header image: Reuters
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
sir_isO
| #
“If you believe that, I have Fountain of Youth water for sale, extracted from the lead-contaminated system of Flint, Michigan.”
Well, I’m quite interested in that fountain of youth water. You see, people have complained an awful lot about lead, but relatively, it’s kinda difficult to fault it.
It’s certainly no worse than fluorine or aluminum.
Besides, it gives you “learning problems”, adhd, that sort of thing. Now, depending on how you look at it, that’s gold right there, since it means those children are less susceptible to brainwashing/education/propaganda. As an added bonus, they’re also more protected against ionizing radiation (maybe)!
Reply
sir_isO
| #
Like, if you’re gonna have a sort of gamma radiation event, and you don’t quite have your SPF 200000000 sort of sunblock on, and you’re not black, and you don’t have a lead coating….you’re probably a vampire and you know what happens with vampires. They’re immortal.
Realistically…shouldn’t that be our species’ main concern? What’s more likely to fuck us up than the sun or the earth, long term? We should probably be thinking of some kind of vaccination style approach.
So, lead blocks radiation, but I mean, as it blocks it, it’ll become radiated/saturated.
That’s no good, we actually want to protect against that radiation. And like cures like, with vaccines, as we know. Like doesn’t cure like with homeopathy or whatever though. Only with vaccines. Because we add more toxins.
I suggest you do as we do here in Johannesburg, and give everyone radioactive lead as part of their water supplementation. That way you can also be a mutant like me.
Do you understand how advanced we’ve become?
Reply
sir_isO
| #
“Most pharmaceutical companies have set a limit for maximum daily intake of lead as 1.0 μg/g, however prolonged intake of even this low level of lead is hazardous to human beings.”
That’s very peculiar, if you consider what other things are allowed at FAR higher results with SIGNIFICANTLY worse toxicity.
I mean, you can buy shit with like 2000ppm sodium fluoride in it, easy. It’s even marketed as good for you.
Perhaps lead significantly interferes with their narrative, and particularly relating to fluoride.
Oh look what I randomly found…
“Lead interferes with the bioavailability of fluoride by binding to fluoride ions in saliva, thereby reducing the preventative capacity of fluoride to remineralize enamel after acid challenge.”
Reply
sir_isO
| #
It’s a bit bizarre saying this, bit lead saves you from the damage of fluorine.
Reply
sir_isO
| #
“Lead interferes with the bioavailability of fluoride by binding to fluoride ions in saliva, thereby reducing the preventative capacity of fluoride to remineralize enamel after acid challenge.”
So let me explain to you the physics of that. Lead is a soft, receptive sort of metal.
The fluoride is highly volatile, corrosive, that corrosion and volatility in terms of their “preventative” capacity, strips away enamel from teeth, among many many other effects. The lead binds with the fluoride, so the teeth don’t get so negatively affected by it, that is, according to their logic…a bad thing.
Which tells you A LOT about how desperately they need fluoride to make you retarded.
Reply
sir_isO
| #
When they say “remineralize after acid challenge”…that’s euphemistic bullshit.
Teeth are damaged with volatile garbage. Physics dictate things tend to equilibrium. Whatever is necessary to stabilize that, is then “attracted” to that.
Reply
sir_isO
| #
“Fluorine is the most electronegative and reactive of all elements.”
Lead neutralizes it. Lead has relatively, lesser damaging effects. Lead is horribly demonized. Fluorine is marketed in practically all of industry.
Reply
sir_isO
| #
Just a reminder, pharma sells things that are derived from opium, up to like amillion times more toxic…as “legit”, promotes fluorine. In the mean time, growing poppies isn’t allowed and things that neutralize fluorine are inordinately demonized.
Lead, for instance. But even essential factors, like iodine. Iodine is the prime essential antibiotic, it’s been demonized, subordinated by non-essential toxic industrial waste products and derivatives mostly involving benzene, fluorine, chlorine.
All of that shit is to cause a sort of whole body excitotoxicity, stressor, oxidative, nitrosative damaging effect and diminish, demonize the protective or neutralizing agents.
Perhaps lead is even essential, considering the circumstances.
sir_isO
| #
Other than the many reasonably progressive benefits I’ve mentioned of fluoride…
Arsenic from community water fluoridation: quantifying the effect
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27105409
So fluoride increases arsenic production.
Anyway…
Fluoride Adsorption by Calcium Carbonate, Activated Alumina and Activated Sugarcane Ash
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs40710-016-0130-x
Other than considering say the fluoride and aluminum affinity, to remove fluoride, and have filtered calcium fluoride results, use calcium carbonate. Like egg shells, calcitic lime.
It’s kinda bizarre, coz last year, I had to “fix” some soil. And it was concrete-like clay. So aluminosilicates. I bought some calcitic lime to like neutralize some stuff.
sir_isO
| #
Some more of those conveniently ignored, super common, super toxic effects relating to the affinity of fluorine and aluminum…
Aluminium and fluoride in drinking water in relation to later dementia risk
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-british-journal-of-psychiatry/article/aluminium-and-fluoride-in-drinking-water-in-relation-to-later-dementia-risk/14AF4F22AC68C9D6F34F9EC91BE37B6D
Have you seen say, the aluminum arguments in vaccines, from perhaps the Children’s Hospital Of Philadelphia? Sheep and chops.
If I swiftly don my hat, I could laugh all day long.
https://www.chop.edu/centers-programs/vaccine-education-center/vaccine-ingredients/aluminum
So firstly, their oral absorption rate which they try conflate with injected absorption is off by around a factor of 8x (in rat models, btw).
THEN, they suggest the cumulative aluminum input of about 6 months of low amounts of gradual, dietary intake at that sort of 0.3% absorption rate, is comparable to that of a few injections, which have a bit closer to 100% absorption rate.
I emailed them once. Spoke with their vaccine center director assistant thing. Charlotte Moser, iirc. It tried to argue my points with ignorants and copy/pasted referrals to “skeptical raptor”…
So I dunno hey, if you are in Philadelphia, and you have children, as Qafsiel/Lucifer/Whatever, I’d highly recommend you tell the Chop Shop that they’re going to be kinda destroyed.
sir_isO
| #
“Aluminium has a wide variety of neurotoxic effects and there is some evidence supporting aluminium influencing β-amyloid oligomerization;8 it has not been linked with other health outcomes.7”
I’m sorry, but that’s incorrect, it has numerous other effects, relating to fundamental mitochondrial ATP function.
As an example of “random” effects it has, aside from what I’ve m entioned regarding cAMP and other things…
Aluminum binds to transferrin, so it basically messes with iron metabolism. Febrile seizure, is a known effect of vaccinations, which is related to iron metabolism.
sir_isO
| #
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/general-recs/contraindications.html
“A personal or family history of seizures is a precaution for MMRV vaccination; this is because a recent study found an increased risk for febrile seizures in children 12-23 months who receive MMRV compared with MMR and varicella vaccine .”
Now, the MMRV vaccine, afaik, uses aluminum as an adjuvant (to maximize damage and toxicity, antigen exposire). The MMR vaccine, did not have aluminum.
sir_isO
| #
Oh right, I wasn’t particularly sober when I was ranting.
Where I said “…increases arsenic production”, I meant presence. For some reason, arsenic and fluoride are often found together. Probably due to them being mostly mining waste products.
sir_isO
| #
Just one more thing regarding aluminum and vaccines, which might also explain some of that zinc importance (and relative deficiencies).
It’s a telling thing.
So those febrile seizures, among other things, includes iron and zinc metabolism, transferrin.
Random exerpt from a paper:
Zinc Status and Febrile Seizures: Results from a Cross-sectional Study
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7595794/
“Febrile seizures are a commonly encountered neurological source of hospital attendance in children with a worldwide incidence of 2 to 8%. 1 The peak age for the occurrence is 18 to 24 months, and the majority (90%) of the children report the first episode before the age of 3 years.”
Protective role of zinc regarding aluminum toxicity:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22422511/
Some thing about iron and febrile seizure:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090379815001063
And something from the future:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0946672X21001127
“According to our knowledge, which is based on basic principles of biochemistry and inorganic chemistry, we suggested that aluminum highly interferes with iron metabolism eventually resulting in iron-mediated cell damage. ”
So, LOTS of specifically children, have iron and zinc deficiencies (relatively)…now, surely, aluminum influencing iron and zinc is of no consequence, considering the sort of unnatural introduction of shitloads of injected aluminum in vaccines, with known associations to those sort results.
Having ruled out injected vaccines with enormous amounts of aluminum as a possible factor, what could influence iron and zinc metabolism so significantly and abruptly…in specifically children?
sir_isO
| #
Oh I said somewhere MMRV vaccines have aluminum in them, but it looks like I was wrong about that.
sir_isO
| #
Let me give you a clue.
The smartest person I know, happens to have ingested shit from lead batteries.
Reply
Ron
| #
Sir_isO, no one cares.
Can we get somebody on here to make comments related to the articles instead of using the article as a springboard to dive into murky waters having nothing at all to do with the article? At this point, won’t be long until we have flat earth debaters on an article about the price of tea in China.
Reply
Howdy
| #
Thanks for the chuckle, Ron.
Reply
sir_isO
| #
“Sir_isO, no one cares.”
And I’m merely explaining to you why Anubis shows you the way of the flow, as a slippery slope enthusiast, left and down, along with AAAAAAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLL that shit you represent.
Reply
sir_isO
| #
Basically, you pieces of shit, are ignorant and try to deflect from the damage of like, millions of infaants, daily.
Reply
sir_isO
| #
But hey, I guess I’ve said what I wanted to say.
If you ask me, humans are to be absolutely eradicated. Because they don’t care. And I don’t care.
Reply
Howdy
| #
Come on “osi”, lighten up.
Reply
sir_isO
| #
https://osifolk.bandcamp.com/music
Yeah. Jupiter is my bro, btw.
Anyway, tucked away for good, finally. I’ll say, if you come, it’s too late.
Who wanted the coldest winter in northern hemisphere history?