British Scientist Effectively Paid By Fauci To Lie About Origins of Covid
On January 31, 2020, Danish-born and British-educated scientist Kristian Andersen, emailed Dr. Tony Fauci saying the virus looks lab-made.
Kristian Anderson said:
“Some of the features look engineered” and the “genome looks inconsistent with evolutionary theory.”
Then on February 4, 2020, after a call with Dr. Tony Fauci, Anderson wrote that the lab leak theory was a conspiracy theory.
“The main crackpot theories going around at the moment related to this virus being somehow engineered… and that is demonstrably false.”
So what happened between January 31, 2020 and February 4, 2020?
Dr. Tony Fauci called Dr. Kristian Anderson and ordered him to publicly say the COVID virus was NOT lab-made.
The New York Times reported on Anderson’s early email to Dr. Fauci in an article published in June 2021:
Over the past year, Dr. Andersen has been one of the most outspoken proponents of the theory that the coronavirus originated from a natural spillover from an animal to humans outside of a lab.
But in the email to Dr. Fauci in January 2020, Dr. Andersen hadn’t yet come to that conclusion.
He told Dr. Fauci, the government’s top infectious disease expert, that some features of the virus made him wonder whether it had been engineered, and noted that he and his colleagues were planning to investigate further by analyzing the virus’s genome.
The researchers published those results in a paper in the scientific journal Nature Medicine on March 17, 2020, concluding that a laboratory origin was very unlikely.
Dr. Andersen has reiterated this point of view in interviews and on Twitter over the past year, putting him at the center of the continuing controversy over whether the virus could have leaked from a Chinese lab.
When his early email to Dr. Fauci was released, the media storm around Dr. Andersen intensified, and he deactivated his Twitter account.
He answered written questions from The New York Times about the email and the fracas. The exchange has been lightly edited for length.
Dr. Anderson switched his story in four days after his call with Tony Fauci.
But, The New York Times conveniently omitted that after his call with Dr. Fauci on February 1, 2020, Dr. Anderson was given a $1.88 million grant and $16.5 million in funding from NIAID, Dr. Fauci’s personal piggy bank.
Dr. Andrew Huff testified to this fact back in 2022. He released this information in a legal report he signed created by the Renz Law Group.
Dr. Andrew Huff reported that Dr. Anderson’s funding at the Scripps Research Institute increased from $393,079 per month, to $800,139 per month after he backed down on the COVID lab-leak theory.
(page 56)
This was tweeted out today by Mises Caucus.
So when do we bring Dr. Fauci in for questioning?
See more here thegatewaypundit
Bold emphasis added
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About Covid 19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Saeed Qureshi
| #
Such reports indicate dishonesty in science and its practice in the medical/pharmaceutical area and government agencies.
However, more importantly, such debates cleverly hide the more significant issue (fraud) of maintaining the story of the virus’s existence, i.e., debating (lab/no lab) leak theory indirectly means there is a virus. How clever!
No one has shown any specimen of the (isolated and purified) virus anywhere in the world, including labs, then how could it leak? Never – there has to be something there to leak.
“Scientists” are telling people and working on proving that something can be leaked from nothing. Seriously, it is not a joke!
Reply
Tom
| #
My feelings exactly. Well said.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Saeed,
You wrote: “However, more importantly, such debates cleverly hide the more significant issue (fraud) of maintaining the story of the virus’s existence, i.e., debating (lab/no lab) leak theory indirectly means there is a virus. How clever”
Immediately after which you wrote: “No one has shown any specimen of the (isolated and purified) virus anywhere in the world, including labs, then how could it leak? Never – there has to be something there to leak.” Which is your continued “argument”
argument | ˈärɡyəmənt | noun 2 a reason or set of reasons given with the aim of persuading others that an action or idea is right or wrong: (New Oxford American Dictionary)
Just because something has not been observed, does not mean that something does not exist. As an example I refer to “atmospheric jet streams”. Or atoms! People have died for some unknown cause. Is this a unknown fact?
Have a good day
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
Hi Jerry:
Correct!
Until something is not shown to exist – it does not exist.
I do not understand why you have difficulty understanding this fact and logic.
Your logic to me is if people have not seen flying cows, that does not mean cows do not fly. It is a problem of eyes not being capable of seeing them flying. I do not buy such an argument. Sorry.
Best.
Reply
JaKo
| #
I think you don’t need to resort to flying cows — I suggest reading an article by Mike Yeadon on this (PSI) website from yesterday (March 2nd) clearly implying: THERE WAS NO NOVEL VIRUS and, IMHO, all we were told and ordered to do will be resolved by a few dozens of guillotines, starting from the WHO through this billion Billy-boy to the Bidet thing and his family — that is, when the TIME COMES!
Cheers, JaKo
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Saeed,
I referred to specifically jet streams, to atoms. Now I refer to continents can drift, for which there was observed evidence that contents MIGHT DRIFT. But such a possibility was not LOGICAL, so for 50+ years practicing geologists had to ignore this possibly or be laughed out of the geological community like those who had gathered the observable evidence that could only explained by the possibility that continents could and had drifted.
And we have the historical fact that Galileo made observations that anyone could make with an instrument (the telescope) that proved the earth could not stand still. Yet, he had to lie to save his life. For the authority must always be correct. For if the authority were wrong, the authority is no longer an authority but only a common human who knows he/she has been wrong many times.
I read that the fusion explosions occurring in the sun and stars are only converting hydrogen nuclei to helium nuclei. Is that why the testing of fusion bombs had to be moved unground? The most obvious is most difficult to see.
I pointed to Richard Feynman’s blunder but I still much respect him for his achievements and his great attempt to convince SCIENTISTS and NON-SCIENTISTS that the accepted ideas (theories) are ALWAYS UNCERTAIN because we can never measure PERFECTLY. And this comment is an attempt to continue Feynman’s crusade.
Have a good day
Reply
Antonio
| #
Campagna di vaccinazione contro un virus che nessuno ha visto? e normale? forzata in Italia contro chi? che cosa? NO
Reply
Tom
| #
What a shock! Most pretend scientists lie to get funding and to promote their master’s agenda’s.
Reply
Itsme
| #
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/deliberate-deployment-of-bio-chemical
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
I just posted minutes ago on Telegram, and it might interest the discussion here.
https://www.protocols.io/view/influenza-whole-genome-sequencing-with-integrated-kxygxm7yzl8j/v1
Good Lord!
This is what medical experts/virologists/geneticists/scientists, etc., have been doing for the past four decades. They like us to believe they are doing science, following science, or isolating the viruses – THE EXPERTS. For heaven’s sake, run to the hills – my friends. You have no hope of being saved.
Technically, to be valid, this or such a procedure must be run FIRST with an isolated or purified virus or its RNA specimens TO VALIDATE. It is to establish that the procedure is valid for what it is supposed to be doing – IF a virus and/or RNA exists. As they have never isolated the virus or its RNA, this list of steps becomes irrelevant and serves no purpose. It is just CRAP.
Please fire the experts and shut down these labs!
Reply