Boston Mayor bans ‘fossil fuels’ in new city-owned building construction

In the latest push for her Green New Deal, Boston Mayor Michelle Wu signed an executive order that prohibits city-owned buildings from being constructed or renovated in a way that allows for the use of ‘fossil fuels’.

The order, which went into effect after it was signed last Monday afternoon, is part of the mayor’s larger effort to implement a similar ban on new residential buildings, her office said, a plan that has drawn the ire of certain real-estate groups.

“This executive order is a long time coming,” Wu said at a City Hall press conference. “It is dealing with what is fully within the city’s control in terms of public buildings that will be newly built or undergoing a major reconstruction and renovation, and committing that they will be ‘fossil-fuel’ free.”

Boston’s Green New Deal Director Oliver Sellers-Garcia said these municipal buildings will be constructed or renovated in a way that doesn’t allow for the use of ‘fossil fuels’ like coal, oil or natural gas in heating and cooling, hot water and cooking operations.

“That means no more fossil fuel combustion that causes greenhouse gas emissions, reduces air quality and locks in infrastructure,” Sellers-Garcia said. “This executive order recognizes that as the owners of 380 buildings with 16 and half million square feet, we have an important role to play.”

She also said:

“We are taking an all-of-government approach, finding ways for our cabinets and departments to play a role in climate action.

In addition to new buildings, this order applies to major renovations because, often, the most sustainable way to make a green building is not to start from scratch.”

Municipal emissions constitute 2.3 percent of all of Boston’s ‘carbon’ emissions, and more than 70 percent of the city’s emissions are from buildings, according to Wu’s office.

‘Decarbonizing’ city buildings and converting them to electrification is a “major undertaking,” Wu said, noting that the effort encompasses many school buildings, public housing units, boilers and appliances.

The order exempts new projects that are currently in the procurement, design or construction phase.

It will apply, however, to future capital projects such as the renovation of Madison Park Technical Vocational High School, and construction of new police, fire and EMS stations and libraries, Boston’s Deputy Chief of Operations Morgan McDaniel said.

The day’s signing prompted a visit from Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, who praised Wu for pushing forward with the climate initiative.

While the new order only applies to city-owned buildings, Wu is moving forward with a plan she announced last year that would ban ‘fossil fuels’ in new residential building projects throughout Boston.

The City Council approved a “stretch code” ordinance proposed by Wu in April that requires new residential buildings to add wiring for future conversions to electrification and to add solar.

The Wu administration also plans to submit an application by the fall deadline, for acceptance into a state pilot project that will allow 10 Massachusetts cities and towns to ban gas hookups in new buildings.

Citing these future plans, Greg Vasil, CEO of Greater Boston Real Estate Board, said Monday’s executive order was “not a surprise, as this is the goal the administration has been pursuing for some time.”

“It will have a very large impact in the cost of development, and more importantly, if that development ever did occur in the electrical supply capacity we currently have in our utility grid,” Vasil said in an email.

He added, “The real estate company is resilient, and if Boston is not a conducive business environment for development, I am sure other nearby communities would welcome the enhancement this would mean to their property tax base.”

Michelle Wu said:

“Week after week, we see the signs of extreme heat, storms and flooding that remind us of a closing window to take climate action.

The benefits of embracing fossil-fuel-free infrastructure in our city hold no boundary across industries and communities, and Boston will continue using every possible tool to build the green, clean, healthy and prosperous future our city deserves.”

See more here bostonherald.com

Header image: Chris Christo / Boston Herald

Editor’s note: What is being proposed here is physically impossible. All forms of electricity generation are fed into the national grid. You cannot separate one from another. The only way this proposal would work is to have a dedicated transmission line installed from a windfarm, or a single dedicated turbine, to a sub-station on the construction site.

This would add millions to the cost of the project, would add months if not years to the length of the project with the excavation of the underground channel for the transmission line, and while the sub-station was constructed, and of course, would mean on windless days, no work could be done.

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (4)

  • Avatar

    Howdy

    |

    “Wu signed an executive order that prohibits city-owned buildings from being constructed or renovated in a way that allows for the use of ‘fossil fuels’.”
    But it’s OK to use these fuels aplenty while construction/renovation is in progress. What a hypocrite. Kick her out on a technicality since the end does not justify the means.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Jeanne

    |

    I live just north of Boston. Most of May, June and beginning of July very little sun. Solar power just is not adequate around here. Very few installations because it’s not economically worth it.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Tom Anderson

    |

    More support for CO2-driven climatic warming. … John Stuart Mill wrote in 1843 (in more ornate Victorian English) that a doctrine may exist because inferences from it lead to ostensibly sound conclusions, while the truth of the doctrine itself persists only by excluding evidence that it is false. (Mill, Ch “A system of logic,” Ch. 6.)

    Reply

  • Avatar

    VOWG

    |

    CO2 is not a pollutant or a climate driver. Stupid people need to be removed from positions of authority. By the way, just what tools and materials will be used to build or renovate? Without fossil fuels there will be none.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via