Birx Admits Manipulating Data, Altering CDC Guidelines to Deceive Trump

Dr Deborah Birx People Magazine

Dr. Deborah Birx, who served as the White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator under President Trump, has admitted in a new book that she quietly called her own shots during the COVID-19 plandemic.

Birx confessed to manipulating data and quietly altering CDC guidance without the administration’s knowledge or authorization.

In “Silent Invasion,” she discusses how she “devised” a “strategic sleight-of-hand” method of reporting she described as “subterfuge.”

“This wasn’t the only bit of subterfuge I had to engage in,” she writes.

WND reported:

Birx insisted, contrary to the White House and the CDC, that the asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 was significant.

She says that “eight months into the pandemic, many at both the White House and the CDC still refused to see that silent spread played a prominent role in viral spread and that it started with social gatherings, especially among the younger adults.”

Birx opposed the advice of then-coronavirus adviser Dr. Scott Atlas to limit testing on the premise that asymptomatic transmission was minimal and not driving the pandemic.

She and then CDC Director Robert Redfield “agreed to quietly rewrite the guidance and post it to the CDC website.”

“We would not seek approval. Because we were both quite busy, it might take a week or two, but we were committed to subverting the dangerous message that limiting testing was the right thing to do,” she writes.

Birx recalls a phone call from White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows: “What the hell do you think you’re doing? You rewrote and posted the CDC testing stuff,” said Meadows, according to Birx’ account.

“Yes, I did, but – ” Birx replied.

“There’s no ‘buts’ here. You went over my head,” Meadows said, according to Birx.

Birx, who appeared alongside Fraudci and Trump during briefings, was instrumental in paving the way for destructive COVID policies such as testing, lockdowns, and masking.

“I devised a work-around for the governor’s reports I was then writing,” Birx admits in her new book.

“Instead of including those recommendations in the common bulleted list, I’d include them in the pandemic summary and state-specific recommendations in the governor’s reports, where they wouldn’t be so obvious.”

Natural News provided additional details:

Birx goes on in her memoir to explain in detail how she would go through covid documents and manipulate the information in such a way as to make it minimally detectable by her superiors.

“After the heavily edited documents were returned to me, I’d reinsert what they had objected to, but place it in those different locations,” she admits.

“I’d also reorder and restructure the bullet points so the most salient – the points the administration objected to most – no longer fell at the start of the bullet points. I shared these strategies with the three members of the data team also writing these reports.”

Birx’s Saturday and Sunday report-writing routine, she brags, “soon became: write, submit, revise, hide, resubmit,” a strategic sleight-of-hand that she says “worked” as planned.

For a deeper dive into Deborah Birx’s insubordination and deception of the Trump Administration, I highly recommend reading Michael P. Senger’s recent substack article titled, “Deborah Birx’s “Silent Invasion”: a Guide to Destroying America From Within.”

Alas, to that end, my book has been upstaged by the work of Deborah Birx, White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator, one of the “Trifecta” of three leading officials behind Covid lockdowns in the United States.

Virtually every page of Birx’s monstrosity of a book, Silent Invasion, reads like a how-to guide in subverting a democratic superpower from within, as could only be told through the personal account of someone who was on the front lines doing just that.

Notably, though Birx’s memoir has earned relatively few reviews on Amazon, it’s earned rave reviews from Chinese state media, a feat not shared even by far-more-popular pro-lockdown books such as those by Michael Lewis and Lawrence Wright.

The glowing response from Chinese state media should come as no surprise, however, because every sentence of Birx’s book reads like it was written by the CCP itself. Chapter 1 opens with what she claims was her first impression of the virus.

I can still see the words splashed across my computer screen in the early morning hours of January 3. Though we were barely into 2020, I was stuck in an old routine, waking well before dawn and scanning news headlines online. On the BBC’s site, one caught my attention: “China Pneumonia Outbreak: Mystery Virus Probed in Wuhan.”

Indeed, as recounted in Snake Oil, that BBC article, which was posted at approximately 9:00 AM EST on January 3, 2020, was the first in a western news organization to discuss the outbreak of a new virus in Wuhan. Apparently, Birx was scanning British news headlines just as it appeared. What are the odds!

Birx wastes no time in telling us where she got her philosophy of disease mitigation, recalling how she immediately thought Chinese citizens “knew what had worked” against SARS-1: Masks and distancing.

Government officials and citizens across Asia knew both the pervasive fear and the personal response that had worked before to mitigate the loss of life and the economic damage wrought by SARS and MERS. They wore masks. They decreased the frequency and size of social gatherings.

Crucially, based on their recent experience, the entire citizenry and local doctors were ringing alarm bells loudly and early. Lives were on the line—lots of them. They knew what had worked before, and they would do it again.

Birx spends countless pages tut-tutting the CCP for its “cover-up” of the virus (though Chinese state media apparently didn’t mind, as they gushed about her book anyway), which is funny because then she tells us:

On January 3, the same day the BBC piece ran, the Chinese government officially notified the United States of the outbreak. Bob Redfield, the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, was contacted by his Chinese counterpart, George F. Gao.

Note, January 3 is also the same day the hero whistleblower Li Wenliang was supposedly admonished by authorities for sending a WeChat message about a “cover-up” of the outbreak. So on the same day Li was “admonished,” the head of China’s CDC literally called US CDC Director Robert Redfield to share the exact same information Li supposedly shared.

See more here welovetrump.com

Header image: People Magazine

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About Covid 19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (5)

  • Avatar

    schutzhund

    |

    What are her connections to China?

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Frank S.

    |

    Dr. Deb will have a new chapter to include in the reprint of “Silent Evasion”. Notably, her testimony to the House Committees and their subsequent criminal referrals.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Gary Brown

    |

    December 8, 2022 New Study Confirms What We Knew All Along: mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Are Associated With More Serious Harms Than Originally Claimed

    Authored by researchers from the United States, Spain and Australia, the analysis reveals that together these vaccines were associated in the trials with an excess risk of ‘serious adverse events of special interest’ of 12.5 per 10,000 people vaccinated. Describing how their results raise concern that mRNA vaccines are associated with more harm than initially estimated at the time they were given emergency authorization, the researchers say their findings point to the need for formal harm-benefit analyses to be conducted.

    https://www.dr-rath-foundation.org/2022/12/new-study-confirms-what-we-knew-all-along-mrna-covid-19-vaccines-are-associated-with-more-serious-harms-than-originally-claimed/

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Citizen Quasar

    |

    1st: President Warp-speed never should have listened to her.
    2nd: If there was anything like justice in the criminal racket that is the American government she would have been sent to prison years ago, or publicly hung by an angry mob.

    (Fixed) SUNMOD

    Reply

  • Avatar

    aaron

    |

    plausible deniability
    political theater
    fact is trump made the decision, trump alone was in charge and is responsible for the vax in the us
    why can’t he and his followers take responsibility for his actions
    more comforting to point fingers?
    why should trump get a pass?
    take a bit of responsibility

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via