Berlin Whistleblower Reveals ‘Terrible’ Nursing home deaths

Written by 2020news.de on February 21, 2021. Posted in Current News

For the first time, an eyewitness report from a Berlin nursing home exposes the true situation after vaccinations. It comes from the AGAPLESION Bethanien Havelgarten retirement home in Berlin-Spandau.

There, within four weeks after the first vaccination with the BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine Comirnaty, eight of 31 seniors, who suffered from dementia but were in good physical condition before the vaccination, died.

The first death occurred after only six days, and five other seniors died approximately 14 days after being vaccinated. The first symptoms of an adverse reaction appeared shortly after the vaccination. From information available to 2020News the patients were not informed about the risks from this vaccine.

This was partly because no detailed information about the novel mRNA vaccine existed because it had only conditionally been certified for use in the European Union.

Lawyers Viviane Fischer and Dr. Reiner Füllmich of the Corona Committee spoke about the after effects and nature of the deaths reported.

On January 3, 2021, 31 male and female residents of the  “ground floor/protected area” dementia ward had been vaccinated with Comirnaty. Relatives of three seniors objected to  the jabs, and two residents were in terminal care, so no vaccination was given.

The residents of this ward are very active dementia patients in good physical condition. They are allowed to move around the ward all day without restriction. The day before the vaccination, the 31 who were vaccinated were all in good health. A few days earlier, all had tested negative for Corona, according to the whistleblower report.

According to the whistleblower, the first vaccinations took place in such a way that all residents were gathered in the recreation room of the first floor area. A vaccination team consisting of a senior vaccinator, three aides and two federal soldiers dressed in combat uniforms performed the vaccinations. The home’s staff and resident physician assisted in the process. The role of the soldiers, who were in close attendance throughout, has not been determined.

What the whistleblower was able to establish, however, was that the presence of the uniformed men greatly intimidated the seniors. The group, which normally shows a “very confident independence” in all usual circumstances, was hardly recognizable as they became predominantly “lamblike” and surrendered to being vaccinated with this novel drug. The whistleblower suspects that a factor may be that the seniors, who had memory of the war, were intimidated by the soldiers and felt reminded of wartime trauma.

During the first vaccination, a resisting senior citizen was detained by a nurse under the watchful eyes of the German soldiers, the eyewitness reported. No legal right of detention or forced vaccination of any individual had been issued.

According to the whistleblower’s account, the administration of the second vaccine dose took place without warning and in the same manner. For example, an elderly lady lying in bed and who began to resist the second dose was restrained by two members of nursing staff in order to overcome her resistance – again without any court order.  PCR test swabs which some seniors tried to resist, was also carried out by physical force against any seniors resisting.

According to the whistleblower, the vaccinated seniors and their caregivers and relatives were offered no information to make informed consent for those who had dementia and what information that was given was from outdated information sheets from the RKI/Grünes Kreuze.

In particular, the information required under Regulation (EC) No. 507/2006 that the vaccine has only been granted conditional use was missing. In particular, the information should have included advice from the regulatory authority EMA, information on various aspects, e.g. the interaction of Comirnaty with other drugs but it was not included.

On the day of vaccination, four of the vaccinated quickly showed unusual symptoms. In the evening they were fatigued and extremely tired, some fell asleep at the table during dinner. A sharp drop in blood oxygen saturation was noted. Over time the fatigue continued and blood oxygen saturation remained insufficient, in some cases seniors were gasping for breath, showed signs of fever, edema, skin rash, a yellowish-gray discoloration of the skin, and a (characteristic) muscle tremor of the upper body.

The seniors also showed a change in demeanor, were partially unresponsive, and refused to eat or drink. One vaccinated senior, who had previously been “in great shape” for her age and suffered from no serious previous illnesses, died as early as January 9, 2021, just six days after vaccination.

Deaths among vaccinated seniors occurred on January 15, January 16, January 19 (2 deaths), January 20, February 2, and February 8, 2021. The most recently deceased senior citizen was a former opera singer who had been playing the piano the day before vaccination.

The whistleblower reports on the state of health that the old gentleman regularly went jogging, danced, played music and was otherwise very dynamic and active.

Of the seniors who tested negative before vaccination, various suddenly showed a positive test result after vaccination. However, all of these seniors did not show any of the known COVID-19 symptoms, i.e., symptoms of colds such as cough, cold, loss of sense of smell and taste, etc.

On January 24, 2021, the second dose of Comirnaty was applied to 21 seniors. After this vaccination, according to the whistleblower, eleven seniors are now showing persistent extreme fatigue, partially gasping for breath, partially edema, skin rash, and the yellowish-grayish skin discoloration. As of February 10, 2021, none of the seniors who received the second dose of Comirnaty has died, but the health of some of the seniors in this group is steadily deteriorating.

The whistleblower described the various ways people were dying after being vaccinated. Normally, residents accepted their approaching death and – perhaps after seeing a loved one for the last time – went in peace.

But dying after vaccination was different, he said. It was “inhumane.” He saw these dying with unusual breathing problems, they trembled strongly, and presented a lonely, futile struggle against death, as if “the people knew that their time had not yet come, and therefore they had not yet been able to let go.”

The AGAPLESION Bethanien Havelgarten senior citizens’ residential home was requested to comment on the events  but has still not made any reply to the family lawyers.

Attorney at Law Viviane Fischer filed a criminal complaint with the public prosecutor’s office on February 3, 2021, 12:04 a.m., and informed the police as well as Prof. Klaus Cichutek, the head of the Paul Ehrlich Institute, which is responsible for recording vaccination side effects, and the Senator for Health of Berlin, Dilek Kalayci, about the events. The health department was also informed, as well as the office of the senate administration responsible for nursing homes.

Fischer requested the public prosecutor’s office to secure the body of the last deceased old gentleman and alerted the officials to the imminent death of the eighth death victim.

Upon telephone inquiry on February 8, 2021, the file could not be found in the registry at the public prosecutor’s office. Such registration during the pandemic may take up to six weeks.

On February 8, 2021 Fischer therefore filed a criminal complaint via Berlin police.

A legal briefing on February 8, 2021 was made calling for investigations, seizure of the corpses and a probe into similar occurrences involving the authorities. Lawyer Fischer reported to journalists on February 9, 2021 as follows:

“So far the Berlin police led no investigations in connection with the deaths described by you. Such investigations are always initiated when a doctor certifies a non-natural cause of death when issuing the death certificate. The two deaths you mentioned are also not known to the Berlin police. In this respect, no investigations were conducted nor has the body of the deceased been seized.

The criminal charges filed by you are available to the Berlin police and are currently being investigated by a specialist department of the criminal police or by the Berlin public prosecutor’s office. Information for this can be received from the press office of the public prosecutor’s office in Berlin.”

The behavior of the police stands in contrast to legal principle and an obligation for all such criminal offences to be investigated. Dr. Fuellmich states.

A violation of this could justify the reproach of an obstruction of justice in the office pursuant to § 258 a StGB.§ Section 160 (I) sentence of the Code of Criminal Procedure stipulates:

“As soon as the public prosecutor’s office becomes aware of the suspicion of a criminal offense through a report or by other means, it must investigate the facts of the case in order to decide whether to file a public complaint.”

Section 163 (I) sentence 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure stipulates:

“The authorities and officers of the police service must investigate criminal offenses and issue all orders that do not permit any delay in order to prevent the case from becoming obscure.”

It would therefore be contrary to current law for the police to take action only when the family doctor, emergency physician or vaccinating agent fills out the death certificate to confirm an unnatural cause of death.

It was already questionable whether an external physician, who did not know the medical history in detail, could properly assess the cause of death.

According to Dr. Fuellmich there is suspicion that the extraordinary death toll –  when ordinarily only one or two seniors die per month at the home – was not due to natural causes.

With regard to the eleven seniors whose health condition had deteriorated after administration of the second dose of Comirnaty, there remains imminent danger.

The police, the health offices and the senate administration have a legal obligation to protect the population. If those who have duty to protect the public do not follow their obligation, they may be punished under law for any of their omissions which had deadly consequence.

Also a charge of negligence may be a factor. In order to avoid more victims the police is obligated to immediately start professional investigations. Post-mortem examinations must be carried out.

A reliance on speculations by police experts from within the police department  could not be accepted.

At issue is which symptoms developed after vaccination and were possibly causing the death of the patient cannot yet be answered by any expert simply because up-to-date no study exists  regarding the the vaccine risks and side effects.

In particular no interaction studies regarding other medicines have been performed. After deaths in Norway following the Corona vaccination, the vaccination of very old, fragile people is no longer recommended in Norway.

The causal relationship between vaccination and the accumulation of deaths, especially among the elderly, is such that government action is urgently needed to protect the health and lives of all those willing to be vaccinated and those who have already received a dose of Comirnaty.

The precautionary principle includes temporarily suspending the use of this vaccine for the duration of a full and transparent investigation.

Measures should be taken to protect those who wish to visit vaccination centers, are residents of retirement or nursing homes, or have a job in health care with contact with patients.

Comirnaty seems by no means as safe as one might think based on the government’s vaccination campaign and the many public statements by politicians and experts who support the government’s lockdown course.

Comirnaty is a so-called mRNA (messenger ribonucleic acid) vaccine. The mRNA contains the “blueprint” for a protein on the surface of SARS-CoV-2. Through vaccination, this blueprint enters the body cells of the vaccinated person via tiny fat particles (fat nanobodies). These are then supposed to produce a protein that is found on the surface of the virus.

This is intended to induce a response in the immune system that will in turn cause an appropriate immune response to occur in the event of subsequent infection with SARS-CoV-2.

Because of the unusually short duration of clinical testing on humans, it is obvious from the point of view of 2020news.de that not all possible negative effects of this vaccine could be researched. In particular, experts believe there is a risk of the formation of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE).

This is the term used to describe antibodies that bind to the surface of viruses but do not neutralize them, instead leading to enhanced uptake of the virus into a cell and thus promoting the spread and multiplication of the virus. Infection-enhancing antibodies promote immunopathogenesis and constitute a long-known potential hazard of certain vaccines.

The occurrence of this hazard has been well documented for previous unsuccessful attempts to develop vaccines against coronaviruses (such as SARS-CoV). In some preclinical animal studies, test animals became severely ill or even died after encountering the wild virus because of the appearance of infection-boosting antibodies.

Experts also fear that the occurrence of autoimmune diseases and an impairment or endangerment of fertility, pregnancy, unborn life, breastfeeding with breast milk and children whose mothers were vaccinated during pregnancy cannot be ruled out. In their view the probability of the occurrence of these negative consequences could not – or not sufficiently – be investigated due to the design of the clinical trials in humans, which BioNTech/Pfizer conducted before the conditional approval of Comirnaty.

According to the assessment of the Paul Ehrlich Institute, the polyethylene glycol (PEG)-containing lipid nanoparticles contained in Comirnaty may, too, be possible triggers of observed serious reactions in connection with the vaccination.

This is also troubling because in numerous preclinical studies, PEG liposomes have been shown to transport substances across the blood-brain barrier. Certain liposomes have also been linked to the death of specific cells in the liver and lungs in animal studies. For more details, see the recording of Corona Committee Meeting #37 (starting at 03:55:00).

According to the EMA Dashboard, as of February 12, 2021, 54,828 adverse vaccine reactions have already been reported. As of January 31, 2021, there were 26,849.

Because of the multiple concerns about the vaccine, a withdrawal request against the approval has already been submitted to the EMA. According to lawyer Fischer, Attorney at Law Dr. Renate Holzeisen will file an action against this approval, including summary proceedings, with the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in due time on behalf of clients residing in Italy.

Such an action and such an application is possible within a period of two months after the conditional approval of Cominarty had been granted. According to lawyer Fischer, these proceedings will now also be accompanied by an international network of lawyers and scientists, to which the members of the Corona Committee also belong.

The judgment in the main proceedings and the decision in the summary proceedings will have an impact in all member states of the EU for which the conditional approval of Comirnaty has effect.

On February 12, 2021, the public prosecutor informed Attorney at Law of the European Union (EU) of the European Commission (EU) of the European Commission’s decision in the matter of the European Commission’s decision in the matter of the European Commission’s decision in the matter.

This, in turn, is intended to induce a response in the immune system that will cause an appropriate immune response to occur in the event of subsequent infection with SARS-CoV-2.
Because of the unusually short duration of clinical testing on humans, it is obvious from the point of view of 2020news.de that not all possible negative effects of this vaccine could be researched.

In particular, experts believe there is a risk of the formation of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This is the term used to describe antibodies that bind to the surface of viruses but do not neutralize them, instead leading to enhanced uptake of the virus into a cell and thus promoting the spread and multiplication of the virus. Infection-enhancing antibodies promote immunopathogenesis and constitute a long-known potential hazard of certain vaccines.

The occurrence of this hazard has been well documented for previous unsuccessful attempts to develop vaccines against coronaviruses (such as SARS-CoV). In some preclinical animal studies, test animals became severely ill or even died after encountering the wild virus because of the appearance of infection-boosting antibodies.

Experts also fear that the occurrence of autoimmune diseases and an impairment or endangerment of fertility, pregnancy, unborn life, breastfeeding with breast milk and children whose mothers were vaccinated during pregnancy cannot be ruled out – in particular because the probability of the occurrence of these negative consequences could not be investigated or not sufficiently investigated due to the design of the clinical trials in humans, which BioNTech/Pfizer conducted before the conditional approval of Comirnaty.

According to the assessment of the Paul Ehrlich Institute, the polyethylene glycol (PEG)-containing lipid nanoparticles contained in Comirnaty may also be possible triggers of observed serious reactions in connection with the vaccination.

This is also troubling because in numerous preclinical studies, PEG liposomes have been shown to transport substances across the blood-brain barrier. Certain liposomes have also been linked to the death of specific cells in the liver and lungs in animal studies. For more details, see the recording of Corona Committee Meeting #37 (starting at 03:55:00).

According to the EMA Dashboard, as of February 4, 2021, 41,140 adverse vaccine reactions have already been reported. As of January 31, 2021, there were 26,849.

Because of the multiple concerns about the vaccine, a withdrawal request against the approval has already been submitted to the EMA. According to attorney Fischer, attorney Dr. Renate Holzeisen will file an action against this approval, including summary proceedings, with the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in due time on behalf of clients residing in Italy.

Such an action and such an application would be possible within a period of two months after the conditional approval of Cominarty had been granted. These proceedings would now also be accompanied by an international network of lawyers and scientists, to which the members of the Corona Committee also belonged.

The judgment in the main proceedings and the decision in the summary proceedings will have an impact in all member states of the EU for which the conditional approval of Comirnaty has effect.

On February 12, 2021, the public prosecutor informed attorney Viviane Fischer in writing:

“Your criminal complaint is already known here, but not yet recorded in our system, so I cannot provide you with any further information on this at present. However, within the scope of the permissible investigations, everything necessary will be arranged with the necessary acceleration.”

More at 2020news.de

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.

Trackback from your site.