Baroness Whitewash strikes again by hailing covid jabs a ‘great success’
Baroness Hallett’s long-awaited Module 4 Report on Vaccines and Therapeutics, published last week, declares the UK’s Covid-19 vaccination programme ‘an extraordinary feat’ and ‘a great success.’
The report adds that it ‘protected people against the most serious effects of Covid-19 and saved lives’. It acknowledges ‘the suffering of those for whom vaccines led to serious injury or death’ but insists ‘the risks of the Covid-19 vaccines were carefully managed and were far outweighed by the benefits’.
The report praises rigorous trials, prompt regulatory action on signals and robust surveillance systems, while calling for modest reforms to the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme and better data linkage for future monitoring.
As the author of 3/11: Viral Takeover, I view Baroness Hallett’s verdict not as genuine accountability, but as another layer of institutional self-protection and a clear continuation of the official whitewash. Chapters 11 (Rush to Market), 12 (Beyond the Label), 14 (The Blind Watchdogs), 15 (Censoring Harms), and 16 (For Your Safety) lay bare how safety concerns were systematically sidelined from the very beginning. The absence of long-term safety studies, genotoxicity testing and any meaningful assessment of the novel mRNA platform meant that critical questions about potential risks remained unanswered before the vaccines were rolled out to the public.
Rushed authorisations and what regulators knew
The Module 4 Report claims expedited authorisation occurred without compromising safety. However, Chapter 11 of my book exposes the leaked European Medicines Agency emails from November 2020 (just weeks before Emergency Use Authorisation was granted for the novel gene-based products) showing senior regulators raising urgent concerns about manufacturing quality, high levels of truncated mRNA, impurities and inadequate stability data. These warnings were overridden in the rush to approve the vaccines.
Chapter 12, Beyond the Label, highlights critical regulatory failures, most notably the DNA contamination scandal. Independent laboratory analyses revealed not only residual plasmid DNA in mRNA vaccine commercial batches (fragments that should have been removed during manufacturing) but also the presence of SV40 promoter-enhancer sequences. Regulators were slow to acknowledge or properly investigate these findings. In response to a Freedom of Information request I submitted, the MHRA explicitly refused to test for this contamination, despite serious concerns regarding potential genomic integration, insertional mutagenesis, and long-term health risks.
Censoring harms: The systematic suppression of injury reports
Chapters 15 and 16 reveal the co-ordinated machinery that silenced discussion of vaccine adverse events. They document how government agencies, tech platforms, fact-checkers, and NGOs worked together to label reports of myocarditis, pericarditis, neurological damage, thrombosis and other serious conditions as ‘misinformation’ or ‘vaccine hesitancy’.
The Module 4 Report attributes lower vaccine uptake partly to ‘false information online’ without examining how official overstatements and the active suppression of real-world safety data eroded trust. It frames hesitancy as a problem of external misinformation rather than a rational response to emerging signals and the lived experiences of the injured.
My book documents the central role played by the Trusted News Initiative, the Centre for Countering Digital Hate’s ‘Disinformation Dozen’ and government-linked units (including the UK’s 77th Brigade and Counter Disinformation Unit) in flagging and removing content about vaccine injuries. Injured individuals who shared their stories were often stigmatised as ‘anti-vax’, compounding their suffering with a ‘second trauma’ of disbelief.
The inquiry heard testimony from groups like Vaccine Injured and Bereaved UK describing this dynamic, yet the final report presents the issue narrowly and avoids confronting the censorship apparatus that protected the ‘safe and effective’ narrative at all costs.
A pattern of minimisation
While the report includes voices from the injured and concedes the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme needs reform due to its strict thresholds and low pay-outs, it continues to portray harms as affecting only a small minority and insists the benefits of the covid shots far outweigh the risks.
3/11: Viral Takeover demonstrates that this minimisation was not mere oversight but part of a deliberate strategy to control the narrative, prioritise uptake, and silence dissenting data and personal testimonies. It provides the forensic documentation: the leaked EMA emails, manufacturing failures, data suppression by the UKHSA and the systematic censorship of harms that the official inquiry has avoided.
The UK Covid Inquiry had a genuine opportunity to deliver real accountability by examining what regulators knew, how risks were communicated to the public, and why serious harms were consistently downplayed or censored. Instead, it has delivered little more than a polished whitewash defence of the programme, offering only token reforms while carefully protecting the official ‘safe and effective’ narrative.
source www.conservativewoman.co.uk
Ty
| #
Great Job, laying all of this out.
But there are Key components missing. There was a well defined track record of years of experimentation, on test animals, of the terrible Vast Variety & multiple multiple Maiming & Deadly diseases that the “So Called” mRNA Shots/Injections cause. In fact…the Globalist American Stooge agency, the FDA…Briefed the Well known deleterious effects of their Patented Bioweapons to the entire captive medical/health community in Oct 2020. There were many briefings that month to ensure the “Team” was well versed in “the Plan” that they were imminently preparing to execute …as that time was 2 months prior to the rollout of the supposedly untested, Patented mRNA Bioweapons…in mid December 2020. The FDA Briefed that community, the specific diseases that were expected to manifest among the mRNA injected. Victims. Briefing slide 16/17 of that reveals the Host of diseases that were gathered from the results of the decades of test animal deaths. The deaths in the real world that followed the rollout of these killer Shots resulted in many more diseases than had been listed in the briefing. There may have been over 1,300 variety of maming and death dealing diseases during 2021…but that count..and whatever it’s final sum…were suppressed…as well as the accelerating death count within the VAERS system at the Globalist CDC… That Final number in the Fall of 2021…is still being parroted as the total death number….For today & tomorrow…but it was only the highly manipulated death number at That time….the continuing climbing count after that time just stopped being advertised. And every time any author comments on today’s overall death rate Today??? They name that manipulated and highly inaccurate death number in the USA from Fall 2021.
Here’s the list captured in 2021…of the FDA proof of death and Maimings, by mRNA shots, in Oct 2020 pre rollout briefings.
https://services.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm?id=364942
Reply
Ty
| #
The previously working link above seems to be interdicted.
https:
//services.
austintexas.gov
/edims/
document.cfm?id=364942
This should work, with full article and rewritten syndromes and diseases.
https://www.infowars.com/posts/oops-fda-accidentally-shows-list-of-covid-vaccine-side-effects-including-myocarditis-autoimmune-disease-death/
Reply
DouweH
| #
Another, Pharma paid for, pile of bullshit from their labor puppets.
Reply
Ty
| #
https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download
This is the actual
Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory
Committee October 22, 2020 Meeting Presentation…wherein the well known mRNA Patented Bioweapon main effects were accidentally presented.
Around briefing slide 17,
there’s a list of diseases that test animals succumbed too during the decades of this so called Covid-19 Bioweapon Injection development. After rollout of this Killer Injection in mid Dec 2020…victims were dying of Anaphylactic Shock, whose deaths were not counted, due to the bureaucratic system set up by the .gov… Over 1,300 different methods of death and maimings were recorded, of these Bioweapon Victims during its first 6 months of deployment.
Reply