On August 24, 2019 I emailed the BBC from their website about climate change being mentioned in at least two episodes of Eastenders. This is what I wrote:-

Mann and his hockey stick recently lost a crucial Canadian court case. Mann must pay Dr. Tim Ball’s legal expenses. Several years ago Mann brought the suit, after Ball, a climatologist, apparently referred to Mann’s “work” as fraudulent.

In this video I respond to a statement left by a commentator on YouTube that ‘the average speed of a vehicle explains what is being done in climate physics’.

This provides an opportunity to have a little lesson on the meaning and utility of what an “average” is and what it can and cannot be used for.

Thousands of people who bought solar panels have complained to a financial watchdog that they are not bringing them the returns they were promised.

Many people took out loans to pay for panels on the promise they would save thousands of pounds in electricity costs and make money generating power.

Litigious climate fraudster, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann threatens ANOTHER lawsuit after newspaper correctly reports he lost the ‘science trial of the century‘ versus Dr Tim Ball.

A mere two weeks ago, Penn State’s dodgy climate professor saw a judge dismiss his 8-year, multi-million-dollar libel suit versus the renowned Canadian skeptic climatologist.

Swedish behavioural scientist Magnus Söderlund has suggested that eating other people after they die could be a means of combatting climate change.

The scientist mentioned the possibility of cannibalism during a broadcast on Swedish television channel TV4 this week about a fair in Stockholm regarding “food of the future”.

Dr Busby says a few words about the Russian Nerve Agent issue. He speaks as an expert in this area.

Chris worked for several years at the famous Wellcome Research laboratories in Beckenham, London as a Senior Scientist in the Department of Physical Chemistry. His job, at the basic level, was to help determine the structure and origin of pharmaceutical compounds. So, he is an expert in this area.

In this video I answer a question from a previous upload where a commentator asks about the origin and meaning of the oft-quoted “-18C solar input” which I frequently refer to.

In answering the question I give a mini science lesson comparing rational and good physics to the fake physics of political climate science.

Two more additions to the steadily accumulating evidence that CO2 plays an insignificant to a negligible role in climate change have recently been published in the scientific literature.

About an hour ago I posted an objection to a Weather.com article entitled: Hurricane Dorian Becomes the 5th Atlantic Category 5 in 4 Years. Then I deleted it.

When I first read the Weather.com article it appeared that the headline was what they were claiming was a record.

Someone asked me in the comments what must be wrong with academic scientists for them having such difficulty with comprehension of basic physics.  This was my reply and it sets the scene for the following book-link afterwards:

About 5 years ago I was convinced that global warming could not be caused by the Green house effect.

After all, in the last 200 years it has happened four times that the global temperature dropped while the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere kept rising.

Numerous individuals have observed that environmentalism as practiced by certain activists is a religion see Rubin, C. T. (1998).  The green crusade: Rethinking the roots of environmentalism. Rowman & Littlefield.

Specifically, environmentalists do not view the world through a complex empirically based lens but instead view issues in simple emotionally motivated terms.