As Deadly Floods Ravage China, Beijing Censors ‘Negative Energy’ News

Heavy rains are flooding cities in central China, leading to rising casualties and widespread destruction of property. Information about the disaster is increasingly difficult to come by, as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) ramps up censorship of any content that it deems contains “negative energy.”

By July 22, the Chinese regime announced that 33 people have died from the flooding, with eight missing. But videos recorded by locals suggest much a higher figure. Chinese netizens, meanwhile, have taken to social media demanding the regime reveal the true death toll.

During recent rescue efforts, bodies were found in a submerged tunnel of the worst-hit city thus far, Zhengzhou, on July 22. Zhengzhou is home to over 12 million people, and the capital of central China’s Henan Province.

While locals demand transparency, the regime has been busying itself promoting so-called positive energy propaganda programs. Such content includes those praising party officials, the military, and rescue efforts. In turn, online censors have swooped in to quickly remove any content deemed to carry “negative energy,” such as footage captured by locals documenting the destruction and calling for official accountability.

Suffering and Censorship

In the past few days, videos of the devastation have proliferated on Chinese social media, prompting quick action by censors.

Videos showed that hundreds of cars were trapped inside a highway tunnel in Zhengzhou that was submerged in floodwater. Some drivers and passengers’ bodies still sat inside the vehicles.

Five minutes was all it took for the tunnel to be inundated, according to those who survived on July 20. Water reached nearly 20 feet deep (six meters) in the 2.6 mile (4.3 km) long tunnel.  “The water rose so fast. The chance of surviving was only ten percent!” said a female driver, surnamed Yang, according to the private Chinese media platform Toutiao.

While rescuers eventually drained the highway tunnel, thousands of Zhengzhou residents crowded around and filmed the process. However, as submerged cars began to peek through the murky water, police drove onlookers away and blocked the nearby roads.

Videos were shot from the buildings, capturing rescuers removing bodies from the tunnel.

In other video clips circulated on social media on Thursday, cries of “It’s horrible to see,” “I’m shocked to watch this happen,” “completely terrible,” accompanied gruesome imagery of the flood’s devastation.

Yet such mournful wailing has been marked by censors as carrying “negative energy” and scrubbed. Other content about people’s helplessness, distress, and suffering, along with public calls for transparency about the disaster received the same treatment.

A staff member of the state-run Zhengzhou metro company posted online an account of the cause of metro trains being trapped in floodwaters on July 21. The incident caused 12 deaths, according to the regime.

The employee said the design of the metro system allowed it to operate safely, but the company managers didn’t want to take responsibility. They also didn’t stop the metro’s operation earlier when the risk of flooding became apparent, the staff member said.

Around 500 passengers ended up trapped in the flooded trains. Many took videos and shared them online, pleading for help.

This content was quickly circulated on Chinese social media platforms, but all were removed hours later.

Meanwhile, Chinese state-run media hasn’t reported any news involving death. Their message, instead, has been that the CCP has led the Chinese people to conquer the flood.

In times of emergencies, the promotion of news extolling the regime’s leadership and suppression of anything that may make Beijing look bad is a worn-worn tactic of the CCP, according to Tang Jingyuan, U.S.-based China affairs commentator.

When a disaster happens, the regime won’t allow any voice to report the true scale. It always reports how many rescue efforts the regime has carried out, and then claims that it leads Chinese people to conquer a disaster again,” Tang told The Epoch Times on July 22.

‘Positive Energy’ Propaganda

The CCP’s propaganda efforts were in full swing amid this disaster.

The Chinese regime announced after the floods that the recent heavy rain in Zhengzhou was a once-in-a-millennia event.

However, Zhengzhou experienced much heavier flooding less than 50 years ago in August 1975.

Areas of Henan province experienced as much as four times the amount of rain in a two-day period back then compared to this year’s volume, according to the Chinese Meteorological Administration. Moreover, China only began keeping official records of rainfall in 1951.

Rather than focus on flood coverage, the state-run Henan TV channel broadcasted videos of singers exalting the CCP as well as propagandistic World War II dramas extolling China’s war efforts.

The reporting blackout extended to national state-run outlets. From July 20 to 22, the CCP’s official mouthpiece People’s Daily didn’t feature anything about the Zhengzhou floods on its front page. State-run broadcaster CCTV broke the silence on July 21, to mention that rescue efforts were underway.

See more here: theepochtimes.com

Header image: Getty Images

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (10)

  • Avatar

    sir_isO

    |

    Well, it was a really short stint posting here at principia-scientific.com but it appears I’m not of suitably conformist status regarding certain agendas.

    So I wish you well with the impending environmental disasters (particularly in the northern hemisphere) later this year.

    Take care. Though it’s unfortunate to see yet another site invalidated. There really isn’t much left to bother with on “the internet”.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      LLOYD

      |

      So you announce you are leaving as if it will somehow sadden us? Or that we will be ignorant without your input? Ego much?

      Reply

    • Avatar

      Matt Holl

      |

      Hey Mark Tapley or whoever, stop lying to yourself and you could one day be straight with others.
      I have learnt heaps about science on this site and a part of the success of that is somebody will make a scientific comment or reference relating to an article and later one can see another comment in the twelve comments list and see it is a refutation or contribution to an earlier comment and as a result one can follow a number of, at times, fascinating insightful scientific debates.
      When there is a pathological narcissist with out any apparent self awareness loading up half or more of the comments with personal abuse of others and some unbalanced perspectives on the real world it destroys potential.
      Many of the people who comment on this site are well qualified people and if you would discipline yourself and not comment you may learn something.
      Every day is a new beginning so you don’t have to hang yourself,,,,, at this stage.

      Good luck to you. Matt

      Reply

      • Avatar

        sir_isO

        |

        Dude, I have no idea what you’re talking about.

        My name is Frank and I’m in South Africa. I literally started posting on this site about a week ago.

        My comment was about being censored. I thought that was fitting for the article.

        I’ve been entirely censored on numerous sites, forums, including youtube (entirely), I can’t use facebook, twitter, disqus, discord, etc. Even on local IRC channels the covidiocracy is rampant. So yeah, I’m not a fan of that sort of censorship.

        Reply

      • Avatar

        sir_isO

        |

        But thanks for your welcoming nature, also, please do point out my horrible comments and their incorrectness (aside from the more obviously joking sort of comments).

        The irony in your comment about narcissism is palpable, but anyway, I’ll refrain from visiting this site.

        Reply

        • Avatar

          CodexCoder

          |

          So other than announcing your departure from this platform, what would you like to say about this article in particular? I have read some of your other comments and I ask this question respectfully, not with an ounce of snark. As for me, I am concerned about how this adverse flooding might affect Three Gorges Dam which wasn’t looking too great last time.

          Reply

    • Avatar

      Andy

      |

      What has happened to make you decide to stop commenting?

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Alan

    |

    They should invite Greta over to explain it to them.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Ron

    |

    I guess reports of the purge of 10s of millions of Chinese under “Chairman Mao” would have been considered “negative energy” news as well.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    A Reasonable Man

    |

    What find inspiring is that the Chinese people have the courage to speak out when the consequences could potentially be so severe. There is getting to be less and less difference between their media and ours.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via