Another Definitive Guide to Excess Death During the COVID Era

Written by Joel Smalley on November 11, 2022. Posted in Current News

European analysis with methodology – the wealth of nations determines COVID mortality outcomes, especially in the post-vax era.

The Daily Sceptic very kindly featured my excess death analysis based on OECD data. However, a few people challenged it on the basis that the results were different from the chart that Our World in Data puts out.

My response was that it is due to different methodology. There are, of course, myriad different ways to estimate “excess deaths”.

Anyway, I am redoing that analysis using raw data from Eurostat and my own methodology that I describe fully at the end in the interests of complete transparency.

Let’s start with the result:

Oh no! It looks like I got it wrong!! Sweden is not the best performer in Europe in terms of overall excess deaths (this time up to 28-Aug-22).

Still, Sweden appears to have done pretty well considering all the bad press it got in the first few months of the pandemic.

And before we get all the “yeah, but” look at its neighbours comparison, let’s engage the thinking matter first, shall we, and first establish what a reasonable comparison is?

Looking at the correlation matrix (truncated here for display purposes only), we can see that Sweden does not actually have much in common with any of the other countries, except moderately with Belgium and France.

It’s a shame that we’re still waiting on the ONS to publish the England data by occurrence date so I could include that in this analysis as I’m pretty sure England will be the best match for Sweden.

All the same, we can use this matrix to group the countries according to those with which they have the strongest historical relationship in terms of mortality distributions. (See Methodology section below for description of how I systematically arrived at these groupings).

In case you’re not intimately familiar with European geography, here’s a map:

Do you notice something coincidental?

Yes, of course, physical geography! The countries with the most similar mortality patterns also have similar longitudes. I still remember when I was told off for making this obvious observation because I’m not a “geoscientist” or some nonsense like that.

Nevertheless, regardless of my lack of credentials, the fact remains that mortality patterns in Europe follow a longitudinal process and I remain open to collaborate with a subject matter expert to help explain this phenomenon.

I couldn’t tell you why Sweden should (almost) fit with western Europe (I’m not a geoscientist, remember) but historically it has done and during COVID it did (to a large extent as well). Note that Portugal is also a bit of an outlier but group 2 was the best of a bad lot for the Portuguese as well.

If public health authorities really did want to get to the bottom of why some countries fared much worse than others then they should look at the fundamental differences in the demographics and health economies of Italy and Spain compared to Belgium and France, for example, or the respective severity of the measures taken by those countries, including how aggressively they “vaccinated”?

For Group 11, with the exception of Switzerland (which is really on the cusp of East and West Europe as determined by the mortality boundaries), COVID does not emerge at all until mid Oct 2020.

For the record again, this is why I do not fully subscribe to the “healthcare fragility” hypothesis. If the excess deaths were primarily caused by the measures then why don’t we see any excess death in this region despite them having the same measures as the countries further west?

Yes, the measures most likely exacerbated things but I maintain COVID had to be present and virulent enough to take advantage of that?

What about the disparities in this group? Is it obviously a wealth gap? Or something else?

Similarly for Group 3, during the epidemic phase of spring 2020, this group evidently experiences much lower seasonal deaths than usual and then gets hit hard in the following autumn.

For Group 4, we are furthest west and inevitably, again, there is no COVID (excess death) until mid-Oct 2020 – except in Lithuania. What is special about Lithuania that they got excess deaths since spring 2020 before the rest of the group caught up, only to pull away again in summer 2021, ending up with the worst outcome across the whole of Europe?

As I recall, Lithuania was the worst for “interventions”, making the Nazi-style policies of Austria look benign?

And so, finally, to Group 5, where Sweden is conspicuously and legitimately absent. Meanwhile, Finland (a bit like Lithuania but on a relatively smaller scale) seems to have flown under the radar in terms of experiencing worse outcomes than one might expect given its truly comparable neighbours.

Perhaps, the COVID zealots should finally give Sweden a rest and investigate what went on in Finland instead? The answers might be better for public health.

And while they’re at it, perhaps investigate why excess deaths don’t shoot up in Norway and Denmark until Sept 2021, 18 months after COVID first hits the scene and six months after everyone has been “protected” from it with the experimental gene therapy?

But what about that “vaccine”?

The most obvious observation is that there is substantially more excess deaths after the vaccination campaigns than before.

But then, at first glance, there seems to be a a negative correlation between vaccinated population and excess deaths since the start of the campaigns:

But then there is a similar correlation between excess deaths and GDP:

Which is the spurious one? I mean Bulgaria does have the lowest vaccination rate and the joint highest excess death rate but what about Lithuania? It has one of the highest vaccination rates?!

Conversely, both Bulgaria and Lithuania have the lowest GDP.

In fact, the correlation with GDP per capita (a measure suggested by a reader) is a significantly better correlate – but only since the vaccination campaign:

Some hypotheses to consider:

1. Are poorer nations less well equipped to deal with vaccine injuries?
2. Do poorer nations feel the impact more of diverting healthcare activity to vaccination campaigns instead of treating patients for real illnesses?
3. Do poorer nations have worse metabolic health due to poorer diet which makes them more susceptible to the vaccine pathology?

Perhaps, instead of “vaccine equity”, more attention should be paid to healthcare equity in general if the intention of public healthy is genuinely to act in the interests of public health (as opposed to the financial interests of Big Pharma)?

Methodology

1. I took the raw data from Eurostat for weekly deaths and filtered out the countries with incomplete data or too few deaths to model.
2. For the remaining countries, I did a simple linear regression through the weekly deaths between 6-Sep-2015 and 23-Feb-2020, being the start of the usual mortality season across Europe up until the point that no material interventions were made to “deal with” COVID. This method will produce a trend that captures the impact of severe peaks and troughs as well as the general change in mortality over time. I like this because it compensates countries who typically have severe reactions to mortal pathogens.
3. I calculated the excess as the difference between the baseline (the linear regression model) and the actual reported deaths, having extended the baseline through to the end of the study period (28-Aug-22).
4. I calculated the “normalised” excess by dividing the cumulative excess by the cumulative baseline.
5. For the country groupings, I took each of the two highest correlated pairs in terms of weekly deaths. Where a country was in more than one pair, I combined the pairs, and so on… For example, Austria is most highly correlated with Switzerland but Germany is most highly correlated with Austria so those three countries end up in the same group together. Slovenia is most highly correlated with both Austria and Switzerland so in she goes as well. I’m sorry if some people think this is “arbitrary” but all modelling is arbitrary. It is, however, systematic, consistent and completely logical and reasonable!

Link to spreadsheet

See more here substack.com

Header image: KHOU

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.