Altering Human Genetics Through Vaccination
As the new COVID19 vaccine is claimed to be the first that can actually modify human DNA we revisit this prescient article from 2018 when the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) announced how a new DNA altering vaccine was going to protect people from most flu strains, all at once, with a single shot. Back in 2018 Jon Rappoport wrote:
Over the years, I’ve written many articles refuting claims that vaccines are safe and effective, but we’ll put all that aside for the moment and follow the bouncing ball.
Massachusetts Senator and big spender, Ed Markey, introduced a bill that would shovel no less than a billion dollars toward the universal flu-vaccine project.
Here is a sentence from an NIAID press release that mentions one of several research approaches:
“NIAID Vaccine Research Center scientists have initiated Phase 1/2 studies of a universal flu vaccine strategy that includes an investigational DNA-based vaccine (called a DNA ‘prime’)…”
This is quite troubling, if you know what the phrase “DNA vaccine” means. It refers to what the experts are touting as the next generation of immunizations.
Instead of injecting a piece of a virus into a person, in order to stimulate the immune system, synthesized genes would be shot into the body. This isn’t traditional vaccination anymore. It’s gene therapy.
In any such method, where genes are edited, deleted, added, no matter what the pros say, there are always “unintended consequences,” to use their polite phrase. The ripple effects scramble the genetic structure in numerous unknown ways.
Here is the inconvenient truth about DNA vaccines—
They will permanently alter your DNA.
The reference is the New York Times, 3/15/15, “Protection Without a Vaccine.” It describes the frontier of research—the use of synthetic genes to “protect against disease,” while changing the genetic makeup of humans. This is not science fiction:
“By delivering synthetic genes into the muscles of the [experimental] monkeys, the scientists are essentially re-engineering the animals to resist disease.”
“’The sky’s the limit,’ said Michael Farzan, an immunologist at Scripps and lead author of the new study.”
“The first human trial based on this strategy — called immunoprophylaxis by gene transfer, or I.G.T. — is underway, and several new ones are planned.” [That was three years ago.]
“I.G.T. is altogether different from traditional vaccination. It is instead a form of gene therapy. Scientists isolate the genes that produce powerful antibodies against certain diseases and then synthesize artificial versions. The genes are placed into viruses and injected into human tissue, usually muscle.”
Here is the punchline:
“The viruses invade human cells with their DNA payloads, and the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA. If all goes well, the new genes instruct the cells to begin manufacturing powerful antibodies.”
Read that again: “the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA.”
Alteration of the human genetic makeup.
Not just a “visit.” Permanent residence. And once a person’s DNA is changed, he will live with that change—and all the ripple effects in his genetic makeup—for the rest of his life.
The Times article taps Dr. David Baltimore for an opinion:
“Still, Dr. Baltimore says that he envisions that some people might be leery of a vaccination strategy that means altering their own DNA, even if it prevents a potentially fatal disease.”
Yes, some people might be leery. If they have two or three working brain cells.
This is genetic roulette with a loaded gun. Anyone and everyone on Earth injected with a DNA vaccine will undergo permanent and unknown genetic changes…
And the further implications are clear. Vaccines can be used as a cover for the injections of any and all genes, whose actual purpose is re-engineering humans in far-reaching ways.
The emergence of this Frankenstein technology is paralleled by a shrill push to mandate vaccines, across the board, for both children and adults. The pressure and propaganda are planet-wide.
The freedom and the right to refuse vaccines has always been vital. It is more vital than ever now.
It means the right to preserve your inherent DNA.
Posted with permission by World Mercury Project
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method
Trackback from your site.
Makena James
| #
Which vaccine is the one that alters your DNA? Pfizer, Moderna, or all of the above?
Reply
Charles Higley
| #
As an effective vaccine cannot be made for RNA viruses because their protein coats mutate too quickly, the vaccine manufacturers have probably ALL opted for this gene therapy approach. As a former teacher of molecular biology and genetics, I see a major problem with this approach. If the body is directed to make a coat protein of the target virus and then the body expected to produce antibodies against the protein, the result might be a temporary immunity reaction.
A normal vaccine is a temporary challenge to which the body mounts an immune response. However, the body does not know to stop making this new gene-directed protein, which leads to future problems. If the body continues making this protein, it will eventually realize that is is not a foreign protein and the immune response will cease. Now, the body is susceptible to any virus with this coat protein and there are many viruses related to the reputed and never isolated, never cultured, and never established Covid-19 virus.
On the other hand, the protein that the body is directed to make is built to associate with membranes (normally of coronaviruses) and thus constantly trying to associate with membranes in the body, with the potential to screw up lots of cell systems. These are long term problems that the current short term vaccine production cannot address.
Reply
Stephanie Ligtenberg
| #
Elderberry people is nature’s vaccine against flu
Reply
Deborah
| #
May I repost this response with credit given to you?
Reply
Kathleen
| #
All of them, just don’t take this vaccine. It’s pure testing and evil. It will change your DNA and your offspring forever.
Reply
Chris
| #
All of them
Reply
Peg
| #
Please research the important work by Brandy Vaughn from Learn the Risk. She was a whistle blower against Merck and anti vaccine advocate who was found dead recently. Go to her website or FB page to learn about the corruption surrounding vaccines and big pharma.
~P~
Reply
JaKo
| #
… and if you can’t stand FB, there is a an alternative:
https://learntherisk.org/
Reply
Kathleen
| #
Thank you!
Reply
Richard Hayward
| #
These are not DNA vaccines – one is mRNA and one is viral-vector DNA (different). The mRNA has nothing to do with your DNA. The viral-vector is like any other virus that hijacks your cell and gets it to replicate itself,.. that’s how viruses work. In this case the virus has been deactivated to produce just spike protein instead of replicating itself.
Reply
Ed D.
| #
The FDA site talks about these types of vaccines. The CDC site has less information about the vaccines than the FDA site.
Reply
Ed D.
| #
The FDA site talks about these types of vaccines. The CDC site has less information about the vaccines than the FDA site.
Reply
Lawrence A
| #
I that your organisation the information shared with us that you.
I have decided not have anything to vaccine , but from thing I read on site are you saying there’s a among does that is good?.
Reply