Activist ‘Scientists’ Claim Record Cold Caused By Global Warming

Those of a certain political leaning are pushing an agenda to destroy industries that produce reasonably priced energy by claiming these industries cause an existential threat of warming, extreme changes to the climate, and threatening our survival

Record-cold temperatures, along with record snow and rain are obviously causing skepticism, so the pushers of the theory decided it was necessary to put out a piece of pure propaganda: that record-cold temperatures occur because the Earth is warming.

I call B.S. From David Knowles in an article published yesterday:

California has been hit with an especially cold and wet winter, in which low-temperature records have been set and the Sierra snowpack is poised to eclipse its all-time high.

People claim they can control and predict temperatures 100 years out, yet they somehow failed to predict this wet and cold winter.

Their dire predictions in the past have been completely wrong; why should we now enact tyrannical policies based on future predictions?

If everything that we have been told caused warming actually caused warmingwe would not see record cold and snow. We would not have had a 35-year cooling period between 1940-1975.

Temperatures have always fluctuated and always will. California had extreme droughts over 1,000 years ago, and it was these droughts, not humans and crude oil production, that created the state’s expansive desert landscape we see today.

It is no wonder people, including journalists, want to dumb down children so they don’t ask questions and do their own research. They don’t mind that American children can’t read or do math at grade level — unthinking masses capitulate to government control.

Also from Knowles:

But the whiplash from one extreme to another is consistent with climate change, experts say.

Since the start of the Industrial Revolution, California’s average temperatures have risen between 2-4 degrees Fahrenheit, and the dramatic variability seen in recent years is a consequence of that fact.

Here is an article that people most likely won’t see. A former Reuters reporter, who was a bonafide climate cultist, now sees the truth.

Reported on over at NewsBusters with the headline, “Former Reuters Reporter: I Was Wrong to Blame CO2 for Rising Temperatures” the text reads:

My Reuters credentials meant that I had easy access to the world’s finest climate scientists.

To my amazement, none of these would say categorically that the link between CO2 and global warming, now known as climate change, was a proven scientific fact.

Some said human production of CO2 was a probable cause, others that it might make some contribution; some said CO2 had no role at all.

Everybody agreed that the climate had warmed over the last 10,000 years as the ice age retreated, but most weren’t really sure why.

The sun’s radiation, which changes over time, was a favored [sic] culprit.

Maybe someday an enterprising reporter will also admit that there is also no correlation between oil, coal, natural gas, methane, and all the other things we are told cause warming and temperatures, sea levels, and storm activity.

When there is no correlation there can be no causation. That is actual science.

Many of the same people who seek to control us by destroying affordable and reliable energy are the same ones who set out to destroy us with COVID edicts.

When Trump and others said we should consider the lab leak theory, the media, bureaucrats, and others sought to silence them by saying that was a disproven conspiracy. They had to shut that down because Dr. Fauci, the National Institute of Health, and others would be implicated.

We were told that all the government edicts were based on science — but that was a lie.

There was never any scientific data that said masks, Plexiglass, or six-foot social distancing would block the disease. There was no scientific data that supported closing schools and businesses.

They downplayed the true science of natural immunity, which as it turns out, is far superior to the “vaccine.” The destruction of America, due to government edicts based on lies, is immeasurable.

People who so willingly lied continuously about COVID, and who can’t define the difference between men and women, would seemingly have no qualms lying about ‘climate change’ in order to push their radical agenda: to remake, or destroy America.

Every solution for them is a bigger and more powerful government, with less freedom and prosperity for the people.

Saying that humans and natural resources cause warming or ‘climate change’ is the biggest fraud ever.

It greatly harms the poor and middle classes, but it makes perpetrators of the theory, like Al Gore, extremely rich.

People should stop pretending that those political parties pushing devastating climate policies are the parties of science.

Science has nothing to do with their policies. All they want is power.

See more here climatechangedispatch

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (3)

  • Avatar

    Koen Vogel

    |

    Well written. I have witnessed the whole arc of the story, from CO2 is irrelevant (late 80’s), to possibly causing climate change in the 90’s (studies funded by NSF and te UN), to the Paris Conference’s scientific Coup d’etat in 2015, to the “No longer buying the BS” phase we are entering. While one cold winter does not indicate global cooling, global evidence suggests we are. Your article pairs well with another one (https://principia-scientific.com/a-case-against-anthropogenic-climate-change-part-2/) suggesting global cooling is happening, and suggesting Geothermal Heating was responsible for the 1976-2018 heating phase. Anyone who claims global warming is causing global cooling should be tossed out of his favorite opium den.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Val

    |

    Jordan Peterson: “… I worked for UN committee for two years on sustainable economic and ecological development and read a very large amount during that period of time and learned a lot much of which made me much more optimistic than I had been before I read the relevant literature which was a real shock to me but the climate change issue is an absolutely catastrophic nightmarish mess and the idea that that will unite us …… that’s not going to unite us. I mean first of all, it’s very difficult to separate the science from the politics and second even if the claims the more radical claims are true, we have no idea what to do about it and so no, and besides it’s even worse than that. As you project outwards in time with regards to your climate change projections, which are quite unreliable to begin with, and the unreliability of the measurement magnifies as you move forward in time, obviously the errors accumulate and so if you go out 50 years the error bars around the projections are already so so wide that we won’t be able to measure the positive or negative effects of anything we do right now, so how in the world are you going to solve a problem when you can’t even measure the consequence of your actions? “

    Reply

  • Avatar

    tracy

    |

    Since global warming causes colder winters….I will run my oven next summer to cool my bedroom.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via