A very convenient pandemic

Image: Tourism Update

In the early stages of the ongoing ‘war on terror’, which started twenty years ago, a nebulous conception of the enemy, non-existent victory conditions and the consistent dishonesty of warmongering politicians such as Blair led some to wonder if the threat of the global ‘Axis of Evil’ had been exaggerated to achieve some other set of goals.

Today, in similar circumstances of unanswered questions and ambiguous realities underpinned by systematic deception, reinforced by Boris Johnson on Monday as he launched the new phase of the psychological and economic war he is waging on the British people – vaccine passports (and after that?) – this question is being asked:

Is there a pandemic? Was there ever a pandemic?

Perhaps the most important point to grasp is that a pandemic is a construct, not an object. There is nothing you can point at which is the pandemic, only various data points indicating that one exists.

The World Health Organisation changed its definition in 2008 to exclude the criterion of ‘enormous numbers of deaths and illness’.

In other words, the definition of a pandemic is ultimately a matter of interpretation.

There is no data that currently supports the claim there is a pandemic in Britain at this moment, and whether any data ever did is doubtful..

The scientific process has happened in reverse. Starting in January last year, the existence of a deadly new pandemic, unlike anything previously confronted, was conjectured on the basis of terrifying rumours and unreliable reports from China, not scientifically established facts.

Once the existence of an extraordinary pandemic was assumed, extraordinary measures were justified to fight it, including the rapid deployment of highly unreliable PCR protocols developed by the Gates Foundation-funded Christian Drosten, shock propaganda messaging, a massive and drastic reduction in health care provision (which has functionally destroyed the NHS in order to ‘protect’ it) and de facto euthanasia policies in care homes, based on Neil Ferguson’s Gates Foundation-funded models.

Compromised administrative procedures recorded deaths as lives lost to the pandemic, providing further evidence for its existence.

As is now well known, an overwhelming majority of pandemic casualties also suffered from other conditions and the average age of victims tracks life expectancy in every country.

If the pandemic had not been assumed to exist, and the reckless and cynical interventions against it had not taken place, how would anyone know there was one?

Data clearly demonstrates that lockdowns and related policies were never necessary or effective. Experimental therapies have been deployed which are unreliable and potentially dangerous. Vaccination may or may not prevent contagion or transmission. The fact that governments and their paid experts are unable or unwilling to incorporate these matters into their thinking testifies either to their sinister intentions or the extent to which their mental processes have been corrupted.

Either they believe that some clandestine end justifies repressive and deceptive means, or else they are insane, or mindless through conformism: there is no other explanation.

Phenomenologically, the most important evidence for the existence of the pandemic is its external signifiers, especially face masks, this mass psychological theatre.

Here again, the conjecture of the pandemic itself justified the imposition of the mandate, and nothing else: no evidence supports the thesis that masks have any positive medical effect and the more plausible scenario is their medical effect is negative. Nonetheless the Gates Foundation-funded behavioural psychologists of Sage and their equivalents in other countries argued that mandating them was necessary(‘because most people still did not feel sufficiently threatened’).

The vague objective of an incomprehensible ambition, opposed against a nightmare, discloses a more concrete aim: control.

Why the authors of this initiative want control presents a complex question. Either they just want it without even knowing why, or they want it for another reason. Perhaps they have a broader plan which demands dramatically upgraded repression.

Either way, what they seem to desire is control over the bodies of their populations. In the idea of vaccine passports, what is being implemented is a political and legal climate in which experimental genetic therapies on human populations are normalised and inescapable.

Armed with vaccine passports, global governments and their corporate allies would be able to establish the foundations of a global surveillance state, with the power to monitor every social interaction.

Vaccine passports are the gateway to the most radical slavery the world has ever seen.

It now seems likely that creating a psychological and social climate in which to impose them was always the aim behind the engineered pandemic. The pandemic was needed to impose the vaccinations, and the vaccinations are needed to impose the passport.

This transformation of one part of the population into the vaccinated simultaneously invents the unvaccinated, a problem which could eventually be resolved through liquidation, but meanwhile offering opportunity for politically profitable stigmatisation.

The vaccinated (via vaccine passports) are granted ‘privileges’ that the unvaccinated are denied in order to compel compliance.

Like accepting being forced to wear a government mandated gimp mask, for no reason whatsoever, a person accepting vaccination implicitly accepts the terms of the new normal. At the same time, vaccination is a ritual, substantiating membership in a psychological community.

Anyone who supposes the vaccine passport could lead to discrimination fails to grasp that this is the whole purpose of this document.

The entire point is to divide society, to rule it.

By creating checkpoints everywhere, power flows to the authority controlling access, in this case Johnson and his faction: a criminal cartel.

Accepting vaccination does not automatically imply a happy ending. The privilege to resume the semblance of a normal life (a ’new normal’ life) is linked to vaccination status now, but the reasoning behind this privilege is contingent on the existence of the non-vaccinated.

Once non-vaxxers vanish, the reason for continuing to offer privileges is also gone.

At this point a new status category can be introduced, and the same selective sequence played again.

In this way, it would be possible progressively to eliminate a significant percentage of the population.

So far the theatre of the pandemic has been organised as a campaign of psychological manipulation with policies conceived to ‘nudge’ compliance by alternately dangling rewards (which are usually snatched away) and making threats.

This campaign has also featured systematic censorship and intimidation directed against some of the most accomplished scientists in the world.

Although these tactics make a mockery of the principle of informed consent, they are of the ‘softer’ variety.

Ultimately, more aggressive tactics will be deployed. The intensifying lawlessness of the police now points in this direction.

What can be done?

The government is ruling via a threadbare fraud. When that disintegrates what will remain is force, but the real command authority of Johnson and his collaborators over the monopoly of violence that defines the British state has barely been tested.

Would British police or soldiers open fire on peaceful protesters on Johnson’s, Gove’s or Starmer’s orders? The question may arise.

So far, the Territorial Support Group have been used by Johnson to attack protesters, and a strategy of tension is being used to increase antagonism between the people and the police, but further escalation would be risky.

What is needed in the meantime is urgently to unwind the cycle of compliance, beginning with the mass removal of the mask, extending to the deconstruction of the narrative, and culminating in total disobedience against the tyranny now represented by this illegitimate and shameful government.

See more here: conservativewoman.co.uk

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (3)

  • Avatar

    Alan

    |

    It is interesting that the definition of pandemic was changed. I looked it up when this first started and discovered it only related to the area where a pathogen is present and not the severity of the disease. The word itself suggest panic and that is exactly what has happened without justification. The pan(dem)ic seems to exist in computer models and the minds of politicians and health professionals, but nowhere else.

    The deaths caused by the 1918 Spanish flu exceeded those from Covid. But we have been lied to about this for two reasons. Firstly, it has been claimed in the UK that there were more deaths in 1918 than in 2020. It is true when the size of the population is ignored but much different when it is taken into account. We have also seen a change in the way deaths are recorded. I saw one analysis for the USA which claimed that deaths from Covid were 16 times higher because of the recording method. We all know that for the elderly and very ill there can be multiple issues that relate to death. We have yet to get the facts about deaths that have resulted from government policies and the effective closure of the NHS for all other treatments. Will we ever be told? I doubt it.

    My view is that the governments lost control of the population after the two world wars and because of the rapid increase in technology and women working and the consequent increase in wealth in the west. People wanted freedom and to enjoy life. Now that is being taken away.

    The lack of a vaccine passport is equivalent to the Yellow Star of the Nazis. The call to stop wearing masks reminds me of the ridiculous masked singer contest with cries of “Take It Off”.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Charles Higley

    |

    WHO also altered the definition of herd immunity, which was supposed to be the protection of an individual by a population which has developed immunity by both natural survival of the disease or by vaccination for the disease.

    In the new version, they dropped the natural part, such that herd immunity can only be accomplished through vaccination. This is evil, as they ignore the logical truth that herd immunity, until vaccines, was ALWAYS by natural means. Suddenly, nature is no longer a factor and only intervention technology, not proven to be effective and not shown to be safe, is the only route. A technology that has NEVER worked before. Yeah, right.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Karma Singh

      |

      Hi Charles,
      there is actually NO evidence that “herd immunity” exists at all!
      Not only are viruses, infection and antibodies merely unproven postulates, scientific evidence showing that they are “fatally flawed” (the polite expression in scientific circles for “total bullshit”) has been mounting for decades. This is the greatest danger for the pharmaceutical cartel – once people realise that they’ve been peddled a fairy tale, they will just walk away from it. Some means had to be found to save the pharma profits. Politicians and pseudo-scientists bought with pharma money ARE the pandemic; nothing else is happening.

      Blessed be
      Karma Singh

      Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via