A Look Back at March’s Best
Two Years of Irrational Fear — And March Was Our Most-Read Month Yet
March marked the two-year anniversary of IrrationalFear.com, and with it came a flood of new readers, new ideas, and a record-breaking ten hard-hitting articles. No clickbait, no headlines engineered for outrage… just deep, clear, data-backed analysis that you won’t find in legacy outlets or sanitized academic journals.
For those of you already subscribed, thank you. For those still on the fence, now is the time. As a birthday gift to you (and a thorn in the side of the climate-industrial complex), I’m offering 20 percent off your first year.
Subscribe here to lock in the deal (expires 4/10/2025)
The Most-Read Articles from March Based on Substack view counts, here are the four articles that got the most attention this past month.
1. Greenland’s Warming Paradox
Read it here
We’re told that any warming in Greenland is a planetary alarm bell… and that melting ice will drown our coasts. But historical records show Greenland was far warmer 9,000 years ago, without catastrophic sea-level rise. This piece challenges the bedrock assumption of climate alarmism and asks: if the Greenland ice sheet didn’t collapse then, why would it now?
2. Follow the Money
Read it here
Billions of dollars are being funneled through new “climate nonprofits” with no scientific credentials and no track record. This investigative dive exposes the political networks and financial slush funds behind the Biden administration’s climate agenda. Climate rhetoric has become the cover story for one of the largest wealth transfers in recent history.
TIED FOR 3rd: Adjusting Reality
Read it here
Sea-level measurements are far from straightforward—and the satellite records that supposedly show alarming rise are increasingly adjusted every time a new satellite launches. Why do all the corrections go in the same direction? Why do older records always get cooler or flatter? This piece breaks down the manipulation happening beneath the surface.
TIED FOR 3rd: Blinded by the Light
Read it here
The Sun powers Earth’s entire climate system. So why does the IPCC treat solar variability as irrelevant? This article takes a sharp look at how solar data has been selectively interpreted or dismissed entirely—because acknowledging it would weaken the CO₂-centric narrative driving climate policy worldwide.
Why Subscribe? Subscribers to Irrational Fear get access to:
- Premium, data-rich articles challenging the climate consensus
- Deep dives into science, policy, and misused models
- Personal commentary you won’t find in academic journals or the corporate press
- A free copy of my upcoming book Irrational Fear: Climate Change when it hits print
You can also now subscribe directly via @X if that’s more your style.
A Thank You… And a Challenge This platform exists because of readers like you. If you’re already a subscriber, thank you for supporting real science, real questions, and real consequences. If you’re not, there’s never been a better time to join.
Join now and get 20 percent off for the first year
Let’s keep pushing back on bad science, broken policy, and billion-dollar narratives that fall apart under scrutiny.
See more here Substack
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.