The Sky Dragon Slayers Moving On: Listen in at TNT Radio!
Professor Claes Johnson – Sweden’s most cited math professor – gives a damning report on junk climate science to TNT Radio listeners and explains why CO2 is not our climate’s ‘control knob.’ Johnson demonstrates how climate researchers made gross errors about CO2 – all due to poorly formed mathematics.
TNT Radio’s fast-growing international audience heard the eminent Swede explain that the book Slaying the Sky Dragon: Death of the Greenhouse Gas Theory (2011) was a science paradigm shifter produced by a truth-seeking group of junk science “Slayers“, where he participated with two chapters.
The peerless Swedish academic reveals:
“The team of authors was headed by John O’Sullivan, who then opened Principia Scientific to take the mission further.”
On his blog, claesjohnson.blogspot.com Professor Johnson of the Royal Institute of Technology
Sweden explains:
“I appeared on the Jason show last week. Take time off and listen to the shows and you will get enlightened. More than ten years has passed since the book was published seeing a steadily increasing momentum of the Slayers and their message with John O’Sullivan, Joe Olson and Joe Postma now running Sky Dragon Slaying as one of the shows on the new channel TNT Radio Live. “
LISTEN TO THE FULL INTERVIEW BELOW:
Professor Johnson adroitly dismantled alarmist global warming assumptions in his chapters in ‘Slaying the Sky Dragon.‘ One question he addressed was: can infra red radiation from a cooler atmosphere have any effect on non radiative processes such as evaporation and diffusion?
Johnson’s carefully considered conclusion, to the disappointment of climate zealots, was “No!”
The Circular Reasoning Greenhouse Gas Theory Argument
One of the biggest assumptions in the greenhouse gas theory is the concept of ‘back radiation‘ which is alleged to add heat and/or delay atmospheric cooling. No such effect has ever been proven to exist in empirical science, but this alarmist computer modeler’s wet dream became a cornerstone of bogus claims that carbon dioxide has a 33 degrees net warming impact on our climate.
“In climate science there are lots of equations. But you do not always know the parameters.” [Professor Claes Johnson – Sweden’s leading mathematics professor]
Indeed, applied scientists and engineers in industry have demonstrated over the past 100 years that in the real world beyond government-funded universities, carbon dioxide is a perfect EMITTER of energy. So much so, it is used only as a coolant gas.
CO2 Retains Heat For Only 0.0001 Seconds, Warming ‘Not Possible’
There is no industrial use whatsoever for carbon dioxide to cause warming or act as an insulator because there is no mechanism by which CO2 traps heat/delays cooling despite all the anti-science rhetoric of an alleged ‘blanket effect’ in the atmosphere. The entire fiction about ‘dangerous’ CO2 impacts exists only in the junk science computer models of corrupt government ‘experts.’
It is only water vapor, by the well-known mechanism of latent heat, that can remotely be claimed to have the alleged ‘blanket effect‘ of preventing heat loss from earth’s surface. But this occurs only at night.
During a hot summer day, we see that whenever clouds block the sun’s rays, we immediately feel a drop in temperature (cooling caused whenever clouds block day time solar rays from heating earth’s surface). Indeed, you don’t need to be a climate expert to fathom out that the sun is the real climate driver, not a trace gas that accounts for miserly zero point zero four (0.04) percent of the air around us.
The goofs who believe such a miniscule amount of atmospheric CO2 can have such enormous power on climate really need their heads examining if they can’t get their head around the simple fact that the only practical commercial thermodynamic use for carbon dioxide is in industrial refrigeration and air conditioners!
Johnson’s rebuttal, also set out in his paper “Computational black body radiation” is that the electro magnetic energy in radiation from a cooler source is NOT converted to thermal energy when that
radiation strikes a warmer surface. We know energy transfers from a liquid surface by way of evaporation. This evaporation cools the surface but also transports considerable latent heat to the immediate atmosphere. As such, the greenhouse gas hypothesis is refuted and CO2 is innocent.
One of many instances backing Johnson’s claim that government climate scientists tend not to count correctly includes a U.S. federal court judge. Crooked Oxford Professor Myles Allen was humiliated in a California case in 2018 by Judge Alsup when grossly over-playing how much CO2 is in the atmosphere.
Justice Alsup: “It’s 400 parts per million but you make it look like it’s 10,000 part per million”
Professor Allen: “Your honor is quite right,” he agreed.
‘Slaying the Sky Dragon‘ was such a game-changer that the seismic impact on independent researchers led to Over 100 Papers Asserting CO2 Has Little Or No Climate Effect.
Professor Claes Johnson was interviewed by TNT Radio’s Jason Olbourne, host of World Series News, creator of A Million Mums for Informed Consent and advocate of Citizen journalism, Citizen politics and Citizen intelligence blows the mind with fresh intel and stories to shake up the old world.
Follow Claes Johnson on his blog claesjohnson.blogspot.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Trackback from your site.
Alan
| #
“in the real world beyond government-funded universities” says it all. Answer, get rid of our useless politicians.
Reply
Joseph Olson
| #
Prerequisites for engineering required two semesters of Thermodynamics are four semesters of Chemistry, two semesters of Physics, three semesters of Calculus and one semester of specialized Calculus called Numerical Methods. Dr Claes Johnson taught this course at the Royal Institute of Sweden (KTH) and was censored for proving no CO2 warming in Slaying the Sky Dragon. Codified since 1870, prohibited by the Nobel selection team.
“Carbon Warfare Rules of Engagement” at Canada Free Press, Dec 08, 2010
Reply
Alan
| #
It is important as well when discussing the effect of clouds at night. They slow down the rate of heat loss from the surface, but they don’t increase the temperature of the surface. The temperature will remain higher than without clouds but there is no heating effect. But if this is taken into account when calculating average temperatures, they will increase, but there is no additional heating of the earth. This is why the use of average temperatures is also nonsense.
Reply