Vaccine industry in PANIC as America’s vaccinated children keep dying
Children are dying from the flu all across America, according to media reports. What the media isn’t reporting, however, is how many of the children who died were also vaccine recipients.
Make no mistake: If only unvaccinated children were dying from the flu, that would be the headline everywhere: “Unvaccinated Children Dying Across America” or even “Flu Shot Saves Children from Deadly Influenza.”
But of course you’re not seeing those headlines for the simple reason that vaccinated children are among those who are being killed by this year’s flu.
“The dominant Influenza strain this year is H3N2. This particular strain has a history of causing more hospitalizations and more deaths,” reports The Organic Prepper. “In addition to H3N2 producing a more serious infection in general, this year’s particular H3N2 influenza virus is particularly virulent.”
This year’s flu has reportedly killed 44,116 people, according to the CDC. The number of children so far killed by this year’s flu is 37, say CDC statistics. The flu vaccine, widely touted by the clueless media as being some sort of magical “bulletproof vest” against influenza infections, is approaching zero effectiveness.
Via The Organic Prepper:
Not only does this influenza strain produce a more intense and deadly flu, the flu vaccine is less effective against it. This Centers for Infectious Disease Research and Policy (CIDRAP) article discusses a study published in The Lancet spanning 11 years that demonstrates H3N2 is more resistant to the flu vaccine. … the flu vaccine demonstrates only a 33{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} vaccine effective (VE) rate with the average H3N2 strain… To make matters worse, this year’s flu vaccine isn’t even close to the average 33{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} VE rate of prior years. This year’s vaccine is performing at approximately a 10{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} VE rate.
So wait, what?
You mean to tell me the CDC already knows that this year’s vaccine is only 10{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} effectiveat protecting children from the influenza strains circulating in the wild? According to CBS News:
This year’s flu vaccine may only be 10{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} effective, experts warn… It is the same formulation that was used during Australia’s most recent flu season — which typically sets a pattern for what the U.S. will face — and it was only 10 percent effective there.
How many children who died from this year’s flu were vaccinated with the “10{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} effective” flu shot?
Note that the vaccine-pushing media isn’t reporting headlines such as, “Child who died from the flu was vaccinated with the flu shot.” No, that would be heresy to the vaccine dogmatists and propagandists who desperately push the false science that claims flu shots always work.
Even when flu shots don’t work, these propagandists still claim they sorta, kinda, almost work. CBS News dutifully demonstrates this pseudoscience delusion by restating the fictitious mantra of the flu propagandists: “Experts say that if you do get the flu, it will likely be less severe if you have gotten a flu shot.”
There is no evidence whatsoever to support such a claim, of course, but that doesn’t stop the media from repeating it — almost verbatim — in every news story that covers the repeated failures of the flu vaccine itself.
There is evidence, however, that mercury-laced flu shots are killing infants. A 4,250{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} increase in fetal deaths was documented following the mercury-laced flu vaccination sweep of 2009 – 2010. Furthermore, Natural News has irrefutably proven that flu shots still contain mercury, even though the vaccine industry deliberately lies and claims mercury has been removed from all vaccines given to children. That’s a deliberate lie.
Not only is it unbelievably sad that American children keep dying from a preventableinfection, but it’s downright criminal that the medical establishment and legacy media both refuse to tell parents how to save the lives of their children through low-cost nutrition.
Vaccine magic explained: Even when it’s the wrong strain, it still kinda works by “vaccine magic”
Their logic, if you can even call it that, demands that you believe in vaccine magic, which requires that you abandon all scientific thinking about immunological responses and antibodies. According to vaccine science, your body is subjected to a weakened virus with a very specific RNA protein pattern. Your body then builds a defensive “blueprint” based precisely on this protein pattern. You then generate “antibodies” which protect you from that protein pattern. These antibodies are pattern-specific, not universal, which is why immunity to smallpox, for example, doesn’t automatically grant you immunity to Ebola.
But wait! According to vaccine magic, even when they injected you with the wrong protein patterns (attenuated viruses) and your body builds the wrong antibodies, the vaccine propagandists magically claim that it all somehow works anyway. Vaccine science be damned. All vaccines are awesome merely because the vaccine industry says so, regardless of medical reality. The entire “protein pattern” explanation behind vaccine science is conveniently abandoned with the vaccine itself fails to contain the proper viral strain.
This is the same lunatic logic the cancer industry uses to push chemotherapy for non-cancer patients as a “preventative” measure. Yes, people that are not diagnosed with cancer are routinely pushed to accept chemotherapy treatments by profit-driven oncology centers. There’s money to be made from chemotherapy, after all, so they flat-out lie to their patients and say chemotherapy “prevents cancer,” even when the horrible truth is that chemotherapy causes cancer. So even if you didn’t have cancer before you got the treatment, you’re very likely to develop cancer after receiving it. How’s that for a medical business model?
The binary vaccine trap: Nutrition is never mentioned as a safe, effective way to beat the flu
The scientifically illiterate media, by the way, is run by nutritionally deficient “journalists” who are routinely lobotomized with mercury in flu shots. No wonder they don’t have the mental capacity to recommend the real solution to influenza infections: Nutrition and stress reduction.
Vaccine propaganda is a “binary trap,” in other words: Every debate is about pro-vaccine vs. anti-vaccine. This “Overton Window” limits debate to the vaccine alone, avoiding any real discussion of far safer and more effective options that don’t involve vaccines. Vitamins C and D, for example, are extremely effective at helping individuals mount an immune response that rapidly overcomes influenza infections.
Read more at www.sgtreport.com
Trackback from your site.
Rosco
| #
So PSI has sunk to the level of advocating that all public health measures related to vaccination programs are dangerous despite the centuries of evidence of improvements in public health since the first treatments for smallpox and the almost achieved wipe out of “in the wild” polio ??
No wonder a Google search for PSI results in little more than a litany of insult and mockery – from the increasing amount of garbage published here lately such opinion is clearly warranted and it seems things are getting worse.
Reply
jerry krause
| #
HI Rosco,
“So PSI has sunk to the level of advocating that all public health measures related to vaccination programs are dangerous despite the centuries of evidence of improvements in public health since the first treatments for smallpox and the almost achieved wipe out of “in the wild” polio ??”
Do you use ?? so you can say I, you Rosco, did not state what you wrote? You wrote “all public health measures related to vaccination programs”. The article posted on PSI only referred to ‘influenza vaccinations’ which have never been claimed to be nearly 100% effective. Evidently mercury was a problem and when isn’t heavy metal poisoning not a problem? My wife gets her influenza vaccination regularly and I sometimes do and sometimes do not. And when I haven’t I am not sure I have ever gotten influenza beyond what I call a cold. I did not get a shot this year and after a round trip flying from the west coast to the east coast I did get a cold. But it was one of the shorter milder colds I have had. The reason I did not get a shot is I am usually quite healthy and I understand that the shot is never claimed to be 100% effective like the polio vaccine was very, very close to 100% effective. The article as written was information that people should read so they can make an informed decision about having a shot next year.
And I am reminded that the ‘influenza vaccination’ the only vaccination that I know of which is required every year.
Have a good day, Jerry
Reply
John O'Sullivan
| #
Ross, PSI posts material on scientific matters that we believe deserves wider public debate. We do not advocate for or against vaccination. If you disagree, please identify any articles on the site that oppose vaccinations per se. That we may be mocked on Google is neither here nor there, scientists who challenge the consensus view are always mocked. If you don’t like what’s posted here, please go elsewhere.
Reply
4TimesAYear
| #
I doubt they think that all are dangerous. There are a few vaccines that are worthwhile – or used to be when I was a kid. The flu vaccine is not. My own personal experience is when I was getting the vaccine, I’d be seriously ill 2-3 times every season. Since I stopped getting the vaccine, I don’t usually get sick at all.
Reply
Squidly
| #
My wife always gets a flu vaccine shot. I never do and I haven’t ever. During our entire marriage (16 years), I have gotten the flu exactly 1 time (2 years ago). My wife on the other hand, has been struck by the flu at least 6 times. Also to note, I am exposed to the broader population much more than my wife is, magnitudes more. I interact with hundreds of people all the time, she does not. My exposure to influenza potential is 1000’s of times greater than hers. Also to note, I try to ensure my levels of vitamin C and particularly vitamin D are always kept high. Another interesting note, last year when I contracted influenza, I had neglected my normal vitamin D regimen and I am pretty certain my vitamin D levels were low at that time.
I don’t care how you slice it, and this holds true for any virus, the absolute best defense against them is a strong immune system, period. No vaccine in the world can beat a strong immune system .. and that is fact.
I am actually taken back a bit by Rosco’s comment. Rosco has always seemed such a logical and intelligent guy to me, but his comment above has wandered into the moronically absurd. The medical and science communities have know for decades many severe issues with viral vaccination. To suggest otherwise is ridiculously stupid, and blindly punching at PSI over this issue, well, I am simply at a loss for words Rosco. Rosco, I am very disappointed in your comment above. I would have expected better from you.
Reply
Squidly
| #
correction:
(2 years ago) = Last year
I so infrequently contract viruses I had to think a moment if that was last year or 2 years ago. I corrected myself later in the comment, but it was indeed last year. Oh, and it was a nasty nasty one too. It attacked my cardiovascular system severely. I was so ill that my wife was on the verge of calling an ambulance for me. It took every effort I could muster just to get to the local walkin clinic. It was not much fun. Fortunately, a fist full of steroids and bunch of Albuterol fixed me up pretty good. I am fortunate to have a relatively strong immune system (thank you Mr. vitamin C & D) and so my body was able to fight it pretty well. I also practice some of the same recovery methods as the Korean’s. While I was ill and having a difficult time with my cardiovascular system, I would still go for periodic short but brisk walks, and then rest. I was able to power through my influenza in record time (3 days), while most of my coworkers were out of commission for more than a week.
Reply
Alder
| #
Smallpox- correct me if wrong- smallpox has been eliminated as a major threat to human life by extensive vaccination.
" No vaccine in the world can beat a strong immune system .. and that is fact. "
I read that as suggesting that there is some kind of competition among vaccines, good nutrition, and strong immune systems. You have to select one and back it.
Now what about people without strong immune systems?
We could let them die, we could feed them the latest mikymacrobiotic diet, (same, the green approach to improving the gene pool?) however before they go the condition gets more virulent and contagious. Even many of those with healthy immune systems will succumb.
Further, what vaccination does is to improve the immune system!
Reply
Squidly
| #
Alder, I didn’t submit the “Smallpox” quote.
Further, you suggest that vaccinations “improve” the immune system. If this were true, then why do you need a flu shot every single year? .. I would be curious as to why smallpox is identified by your system after being vaccinated but influenza is not.
Just because I can recognize that object across the street is a cow and you cannot, does not mean my eyesight is better than yours.
I would submit that the notion a vaccination “improves” your immune system is false. It may alter it, but it would be debatable whether or not that alteration could be considered an “improvement”.
Squidly
| #
Oh, I forgot to mention the fact that, vaccination or not, it is your immune system that is still responsible for combatting the virus. The vaccination doesn’t combat anything. A vaccination in a weak immune system could still see the patient die (perhaps even from the vaccination itself, which happens).
Are you aware that even with all of our vast medical knowledge and technology, humans have never “cured” a single virus? .. not a single one. Oh sure, they can vaccinate you so your immune system will now “recognize” the virus, but we have never actually eradicate a virus. We have never been able to actually kill the virus itself. Food for thought.
Dawn
| #
The evidence is overwhelming, and more people with unvaccinated children are stepping forward to prove their children are healthy and vibrant. Find the more recent studies (2014) from Japan on HPV vax sterilizing young women. Japan along with several other countries have since banned the HPV vax produced in America. Also only weeks ago a study on addition sterilizing drugs were found in vaccines being distributed in Africa…The Gates Foundation is setting out to experiment new vaccines to hit the market for us human cattle shortly….get informed or our future generations will have medical problems that will be catastrophic.
And Rosco….have a good year, learn a lil’ its fun-da-mental
Reply
Rosco
| #
“If you don’t like what’s posted here, please go elsewhere.”
Wow – petulance one expects from a five year old.
The headline title of this article “Vaccine Industry In PANIC As America’s Vaccinated Children Keep Dying” far exceeds the worst of the consensus claims !
A recently published article stated the few micrograms of aluminium used in vaccinations was responsible for autism – it too had an alarmist headline – despite the facts that aluminium is found in far higher concentrations is numerous everyday items humans expose themselves to including drinking water. As a Brit you should remember the example of a whole town going mad because the alum sludge floc blanket at a water treatment plant was accidentally broken down by inadvertent addition of acid releasing the aluminium into the town water supply.
Several articles recently published contain simple factual errors and outright untruths intended to mock and ridicule consensus climate science. It is not valid to ridicule the opponent’s side of an argument with easy to prove untruths.
The most recent was this piece of BS which it took less than 30 seconds to prove was nonsense and indefensible –
“The 3% of the Earth’s yearly carbon dioxide output that is human sourced is responsible for 100% of the “”global warming”” caused by carbon dioxide. The 97% of the Earth’s yearly carbon dioxide output that is “natural” has no effect whatsoever on global temperatures.”
That has NEVER been the position the “consensus” has taken on humanity’s contribution to CO2 yet the article asserted that such an absurd position was what climate “scientists” say.
Seriously such blatant lying about your opponents does more harm to any rational debate – it simply proves one has no argument to support a claim other than deceit – exactly what one can legitimately claim about the consensus.
Adopting their tactics using nonsensical claims which are easily proven wrong only destroys what vestiges of credibility remain.
I can’t believe anyone can defend such blatant grandstanding ridiculous headlines for articles some of which contain blatant lies and misrepresentation of fact.
Reply
Rosco
| #
“If you disagree, please identify any articles on the site that oppose vaccinations per se.”
Seriously ??
There are 3 right under this article and you are already attracting the fringe loony anti vaccination crowd as evident by at least one comment.
Well done for destroying the false claim PSI is a fringe loony pseudoscience site – Oh wait …
Reply
Sam Northcliffe
| #
I am not sure Alfred Russel Wallace could be described as “fringe, loony”.
In his book, The Wonderful Century – the successes and failures of the 19th century the longest chapter is on the failure of enforced smallpox vaccination.
He cites the refusal of the citizens of Leicester to take the vaccine. Both the incidence of and mortality from smallpox in Leicester was many times less in Leicester than in compliant towns and cities such as Warrington.
It makes very interesting reading and, Wallace is very thorough in his analyses.
You can read it here for free: https://archive.org/details/wonderfulcentury028485mbp
Reply
Rosco
| #
And yet smallpox has been eliminated as an “in the wild” virus and polio is on the verge of being eliminated as well.
All of this huge public health benefit from what you apparently describe as “dangerous” vaccines has come at the huge costs (?) of a more than doubling of human life expectancy, huge savings in human misery by massive reductions in infant mortality as well as a more advanced civilization – though reading the loony views regarding immunology expressed all too often here I doubt the last point sometimes.
Seriously – how can any rational person doubt immunization hasn’t been the single most important advance in public health since we stopped throwing shit out the windows ?
What will you advocate when antibiotics abuse results in them losing their efficacy – we all return to the dark ages ?
The beliefs in the “evils” of vaccination sounds like a similar story woven by the IPCC to me !
Reply
Sam Northcliffe
| #
Perhaps you should familiarise yourself with the work of Dr Suzanne Humphries, a Board certified nephrologist who like you “believed” in the theory of immnology.
Only when she made a detailed study did she realise that most of these diseases had been virtually eliminated long before the introduction of vaccines.
You do yourself a disservice as you are the one arguing from a position of ignorance
Reply
Alder
| #
Rosco, greetings.
Of all measures that benefit humanity I propose the top three as:
the supply of potable water, systems to remove wastewater, and vaccination.
Many nations still do not have these, they may make fine vacation spots, but do not drink the water, keep clear of poo, and keep your children away from the local children.
Nature does not care about us one way or the other.
There is evidence that in pre-history the human population was nearly wiped out by disease. Later, plagues, the black death and so on, had the same effect. Many many died.
If they are not your tribe, the survivors may say ok, it improves the gene pool. But some of these events were a close call for humanity.
Now, there is vaccination, to refuse its benefits is to gamble with very high stakes.
Yes, some die after getting it, but from what cause?
Perhaps an inadequate dose? Lax systems gave a non-dose? Something else?
This feeling bad after a jab is not to be feared. The vaccination contains the enemy but it is dead, the body reacts to the concoction by defence measures which we may mis-interpret as having the condition. If after, the enemy arrives alive, the body knows what to do, the immune system has been trained and strengthened.
The law of evolution via natural selection applies to all living things, friend and foe alike. The enemy of last year has gone, mutations have become the new enemy. When our old defenses are not adapted to meet the new enemy, new approaches, new vaccinations are needed. Humanity does not have to wait for mutations over generations (which may not come). We apply intellect and have an accumulation of knowledge to use.
Rosco- You are doing excellent work in countering the weird ideas that
we get on here from time to time.
I cannot resist commenting:
“What the media isn’t reporting, however, is how many of the children
who died were also vaccine recipients.”
Ok. how many? Died v. would otherwise have died. Data. Sources.
Reply
Sam Northcliffe
| #
That’s funny – the US Supreme Court ruled vaccines are inherently unsafe.
Why do the vaccine manufacturers list “side effects”?
How much does the Vaccine Injury Compenastion Program pay out each year? Go on do your homework.
It’s important to understand that ALL vaccines carry a risk for provoking an immediate acute adverse reaction, such as anaphylactic shock, fainting, or having a seizure, which could be truly life threatening if you’re driving a car or crossing a street after you have left the store where you got vaccinated, for example. Further, vaccines can impair and alter immune system responses and can also cause brain inflammation (encephalitis or encephalopathy) that may lead to permanent brain damage.
In addition, as Institute of Medicine Committees have pointed out in published reports, some individuals are more susceptible to suffering harm from vaccines because of biological, genetic, and environmental risk factors but, most of the time, doctors cannot predict who will be harmed because there are few scientific studies that have evaluated vaccine risks for individuals.16 Here are just some of the ways vaccines can impair or alter immune responses and brain function:
Some components in vaccines are neurotoxic, including heavy metals such as mercury preservatives and aluminum adjuvants; residual toxins like endotoxin and bioactive pertussis toxin; and chemicals like formaldehyde and phenooxyethanol.
The lab-altered and genetically engineered viruses and bacteria in vaccines may impair immune responses and do not stimulate the same kind of immunity that occurs when the body responds to an infectious disease
Foreign DNA/RNA from human, animal and insect cell substrates used to produce vaccines may trigger serious health problems for some people
Vaccines may alter your T-cell function and lead to chronic illness
Vaccines can trigger allergies by introducing large foreign protein molecules into your body that have not been properly broken down by your digestive tract (since they are injected). Your body can have an allergic reaction to these foreign particles
Reply
Alder
| #
The US Supreme Court rules ‘ vaccines are inherently unsafe’. Court rulings have one objective, to maximize work and revenue for the legal profession. The US legal system has gained notoriety for imposing warnings, buy a packet of peanuts and get a warning printed on the label ‘May contain peanuts’. Leaflets
accompanying medications are full of warnings and get-outs and light on real information. Quite different medications for different conditions may have the same wording on safety warning leaflets.
‘vaccines carry risk..’ True, but doing nothing carries risk, it is better to make use of the best knowledge, evidence and test results.
‘some individuals are more ‘ ..etc. – Agreed.
and – ‘doctors cannot predict who ‘ … Agreed.
Medical science is unfortunately a long way from tailoring medications to individuals, their genes and the severity of the condition. This variation in people adds to risk but is of the same nature as dosing on supplements and overeating on burgers. Testing regimes require a mix of dosings and subjects who are racially profiled as well as selected across sex and size.
That is why approved medications are so costly.
This PSI article is, well not up to standard. I do get that it tries to
criticize just flu jabs and just one year (I think), but I could not get
anything sensible following the links. (and I am having slow internet this week).
I was hoping for some data on the recent flu jab that I have read elsewhere is not up to the standard of that of previous years’. Is there anything?
Our host John O’Sullivan says- scientists who challenge the consensus view are always mocked. Often, yes. Anyway, I will give more time to scientists than the scammers who remind us that ‘They laughed at Galileo’,
but they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.
I will be out-station for a week, so over and out.