5G – Advanced Technology for Our Wellbeing or a Kill Grid Dystopia?

Written by Need To Know Publications on July 24, 2025. Posted in Current News

5G has been rolled out extremely fast without any pre-testing for long-term health effects. (They were even rolling out 5G during the ‘lockdown’ of the fake pandemic five years ago.)

Thus, It is a live experiment and we are the test subjects.

We have been increasingly exposed to man-made microwave radiation via 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G, WIFI, and bluetooth.

In addition, utility companies are replacing analogue electricity and gas meters with smart meters which transmit information using pulsed wireless radiation.

Very Few Countries Have Placed Restrictions on 5G

With reference to a world map of 5G rollout it appears the rollout has taken place pre-dominantly in Europe, North America, China, India, Japan, Australian cities, and parts of South-East Asia.

It appears, almost all of Russia, Africa, South America, and the Middle-East do not have 5G. According to GSMA, by the end of 2023, over 100 countries had not launched 5G networks at all.

These include many in SubSaharan Africa, parts of Asia, and some Pacific island nations. In Russia, according to ChatGPT, 5G test zones are being established in major cities, including Moscow, Saint Petersburg, Novosibirsk, Kazan; and a timeline exists for a wider rollout across Russia from 2027 to 2035.

I note also that some countries have placed restrictions on 5G and, in some cases, outright banned the technology. According to ChatGPT, complete or partial 5G moratoriums/bans (usually citing health concerns) exist in Slovenia, Nigeria, certain municipalities in Bulgaria, and in some local councils across Europe & North America.

Despite numerous studies that radiation from existing wireless technology causes adverse health effects, very few national governments banned the rollouts, which require the installation of millions of extra antennae, to be placed closer to homes, schools, hospitals etc.

Is 5G Safe? Let’s Consider the Following Quotes

“The 5G rollout is absolutely insane” —Dr Martin Pall, Professor emeritus of biochemistry and basic medical sciences at Washington State University.

“I cannot welcome such technology if the radiation standards, which must protect the citizen, are not respected, 5G or not. The people of Brussels are not guinea pigs whose health I can sell at a profit.” —Céline Fremault, Minister of the Government (Brussels-Captial Region)

“The question then is – are there any health implications, any public safety implications…? … So there really is no research ongoing? We’re kind of flying blind here – so far as health and safety is concerned” —US Senator Blumenthal at Senate Hearing with Telecom Industry representatives.

“The greatest polluting element in the earth’s environment is the proliferation of electromagnetic fields… All life pulsates in time to the Earth and our artificial fields cause abnormal reactions in all organisms… Increasing electropollution could set in motion irreversible changes leading to our extinction.” —Dr Robert O Becker, Author, and two times Nobel Prize Nominee

“If I asked you how much more radiation is penetrating your body today compared to ten years ago, is it twice as much, three times as much? No, it’s a quintillion times more. That’s a one with eighteen zeros (1,000,000,000,000,000,000)“ —Professor Olle Johansson, Karolinska Institute, Sweden

“I’m here with disturbing news about our favorite gadgets: cell phones, tablets, wi-fi, etc. Putting it bluntly, they are damaging the living cells in our bodies and killing many of us prematurely …” —Dr Martin Blank, Dept Physiology and Cellular Biophysics at Columbia University.

The website Electromagnetic Sense Ireland references many studies that document harmful biological effects in humans and living things from electromagnetic fields. The website asserts that biological effects include: oxidative stress, altered brain development, DNA damage, immune system damage, memory and concentration problems, sleep problems, sperm damage, hyperactivity and behaviour problems, breach of blood-brain barrier, brain tumours, cancers, microwave sickness, electrosensitivity, and harm to bees, birds and trees.

Is 5G Part of a Depopulation Agenda and a Dystopian Future?

I note that after driving on the highway or walking near a 5G transmitter some people report unusual headache, muscle ache/cramp, tinnitus, or a burning sensation.

Given the above studies one has to ask is the 5G/IoT project simply about another multi-trillion-dollar mega-corporate business, or are we being cooked by gigawatt microwaves deliberately so that we’ll get cancer?

Is 5G part of de-population agenda? Is it a kill grid? The ulteriors controlling the mega-corporate financial and political super-structure would’nt do that would they?

Just like they wouldn’t launch a fake pandemic and try to force you take an untested and dangerous vaccine; just like they wouldn’t launch a world-wide climate scam to implement totalitarian energy policies; just like they wouldn’t fund and orchestrate world wars with carpet bombing of civilian population centres (while mega-corporations owning weapons factories on both ‘sides’ remained strangely untouched); and just like all the other ‘cattle for the slaughter’ lies of the money masters posing as truth for profit, control, and an ulterior agenda.

“The new 5G wireless technology involves millimeter waves (extremely high frequencies) producing photons of much greater energy than even 4G and WiFi. Allowing this technology to be used without proving its safety is reckless in the extreme, as the millimeter waves are known to have a profound effect on all parts of the human body.” —Prof. Trevor Marshall, Director Autoimmunity Research Foundation, California

“… the scientific evidence that indicates grave dangers continues to grow: increase in the risk of cancer, infertility, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, electrohypersensitivity… 5G technology involves a radical increase of levels of electromagnetic pollution. Therefore 180 doctors and scientists from 36 countries have written a letter to the European Union demanding a moratorium on its implementation” —Arthur Firstenburg, Cellularphonetaskforce

Unsafe ‘Safety Standards’?

So-called “safety standards” were set by ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection) in 1998 and updated in 2020. However, according to Electrosense Ireland:

“ICNIRP are a self-appointed closed group, with conflicts of interest who refuse to acknowledge scientific studies showing clear evidence of cancer and the 2011 classification of wireless radiation as a Group 2B Carcinogen… The BioInitiative Report 2012 informs us that exposure to wireless and electromagnetic radiation causes biological damage at levels far below ICNIRP’s safety standards.”

I note also that The Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly issued recommendations in 2011 to all member states of the Council of Europe that they:

“reconsider the scientific basis for the present standards on exposure to electromagnetic fields set by the International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection, which have serious limitations, and apply ALARA principles, covering both thermal effects and the athermic or biological effects of electromagnetic emissions or radiation”, as well as reducing children’s exposure to electromagnetic radiation, setting “preventive thresholds for levels of long-term exposure to microwaves, in accordance with the precautionary principle” and informing the public of the potential health risks.”

I note also that the Environmental Health Trust have listed research studies on industry influence and Involvement in the science of EMF; and that in 2002, more than 1,000 doctors signed the Freiburg Appeal calling on support and demanding precaution with regard to wireless radiation, stating:

“Adverse effects of electromagnetic fields and the fundamental impairment of biological control mechanisms can occur well below current exposure limits and have been demonstrated, in some instances for decades.”

We know that trees and forests protect from these signals, acting like microwave shielding. Yet roadside trees have been felled en-masse to enable 5G signal transmission to vehicles.

Some people more sensitive to EMF radiation avoid close proximity to cell towers and transmitters, don’t use smart phones and WIFI, and have opted out of a smart meter (you can force your utility company to uninstall your smart meter, you do not consent).

Instead of WIFI, ethernet cables can be used instead, even though it’s less convenient. The whole country is wired, there is no need for 5G.

In relation to EMF sickness some people report that grounding (feet on the earth); spending time in a forest; or bathing in the sea (or a clean river) is good for health, perhaps resetting natural frequencies in the body.

See more here substack.com

Header image: The Telegraph

Please note: PSI does not necessarily endorse the views of each and every article we publish. Our intention is to encourage open, honest, scientific debate.

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.