Lab experiments show the sickness within virology
The Substack The Virology Controls Studies Project by Jamie Andrews challenges virology and genetic science. It aims to prove virology is flawed through simple control experiments
His team’s control studies are simple experiments designed to test virology’s claims by comparing samples that should show a virus with ones that shouldn’t.
For example, they use cell cultures with and without supposed viral material to see if they behave differently, like showing cell damage (cytopathic effects).
They also run PCR tests on samples with no virus to check if they still give false positives.
Virology is not a biology, it is a chemistry, and a bad one at that. The entire premise of viruses as biological entities is flawed because their “isolation” involves chemical processes that lack proper controls. — Jamie Andrews
The conclusion is that virologists’ methods are unreliable because the results often look the same whether a virus is present or not.
Jamie’s argument, basically…
- Scientists observe a blurry blob under electron microscopy.
- They label it as a specific virus. (How would they know?)
- They then generate a digital interpretation of that alleged virus, known as a genome sequence.
- There’s no way to confirm whether that specific particle is transmissible or causes illness in healthy people, despite their claims.
- Jamie’s work shows that lab samples, confirmed to contain no viruses, reveal particles indistinguishable from those identified as viruses.
- How, then, can scientists claim what is or isn’t a virus? (How do they know?)
He’s essentially proving a negative.
This is crucial because it challenges a foundational medical claim we’ve grown accustomed to accepting unquestioningly. It’s highly arrogant to assume humanity has reached the pinnacle of scientific understanding.
I think future generations will laugh at our current explanations for illness, such as viruses, particularly given that the term “virus” has evolved over centuries, originally meaning “toxin” or “poison”.
Our control experiments show no difference in cytopathic effects between supposedly infected and uninfected cell cultures, proving that what virologists call “viral effects” are just artifacts of their methods. — Jamie Andrews
See more here jermwarfare.com
Header image: CapSid
Please note: PSI does not necessarily endorse the views of each and every article we publish. Our intention is to encourage open, honest, scientific debate.
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Tom
| #
Virology is the greatest fake science ever invented and responsible for the most murders.
Reply
Alan
| #
And used by bankers to make more and more money.
Reply
Anapat
| #
Absolutely right both of you!
Reply