60 Cymbals Debunks the Greenhouse Effect
This video follows on from the blog post regarding Sabine Hossenfelder and her absolute confusion as to what the climate ‘greenhouse effect’ actually is
Physicists are so confused by it because it does not actually exist, and so no wonder it cannot be defined, hence leading to the confusion.
Here we find a science channel, 60 Cymbals, attempt to explain the climate ‘greenhouse effect’, but hilariously and with complete lack of self-awareness, end up debunking the existence of the climate ‘greenhouse effect’!
Follow up: No need to be polite to people seceming the end of life on Earth!
Enjoy this response to Michael Merrifield who thinks that flat Earth physics which debunks climate alarmism and the field of climate science in general as a legitimate field of science is in fact a great way to do physics.
Michael, the Earth isn’t flat! And it makes a difference! And you shouldn’t participate in causing the end of life on Earth with your hatred of CO2!
See more here climateofsophistry.com and here climateofsophistry.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
John Thomas Bakkila
| #
Don’t stop swearing, Joseph. You’re SO right that I just bought your book.
thanks.
Reply
Richard Greene
| #
Only s t u p i d people claim the greenhouse effect does not exist.
The author of this article is a s t u p i d person
Reply
Tom Anderson
| #
In 1909 Dr. R.W. Wood demonstrated that IR-active gases had a vanishingly small cooling effect on temperature. Dr. R. Lee called the “greenhouse” a misnomer in 1973 because botanical crypto-climates” in glassed in structures do not acquire heat from radiant sources available to the atmosphere.. (J. applied meteorology and climatology, v. 12, No.3, pp. 556-557, 1 Apr 73). In 1985, in the quiet before this storm, the U.S. DOE also concluded that the “greenhouse” was a “misnomer.” In 2009 physicists Gerlich and Tscheuschner explained with meticulous mathematics that indeed enveloping windows store no energy. Every claim of a “greenhouse” effect (there are about six) has been refuted in detail. (e.g., Hertzberg, Siddons & Schreuder – not stupid people.) The most ridiculous greenhouse tale has the atmosphere “capturing” twice the energy the surface absorbs and re-emitting it back to the surface, which the Second Law of Thermodynamics makes an impossibility. Some scientists claim to see back radiation in in hand-held meters, although it does not appear in satellite images. There is no evidence of back radiation on the Earth’s surface. (Nahle, Nassif, “Observations of ‘backradiation. during nighttime and daytime,” Biology Cabinet, Principia International, 26 Sept. 2011.) Neither the IPCC nor any government agency has explained the origin of this extra energy sent down to Earth.
A few non-believers in the “greenhouse” but they consider evidence first.
Reply
Alan
| #
These people only exist because of the internet which removes all human interaction and allows them to put any nonsensical arguments forward, and they know they will always get people supporting them.
Reply