46 UN IPCC Scientists Break Ranks to Denounce Mass Climate Censorship

Written by PSI Editor on May 12, 2026. Posted in Current News

Dozens of scientists were brought in to advise the UN. They ended up whistleblowing. Here is what the IPCC did not want you to read.

If you think the “debate” on climate change is settled, you haven’t been paying attention to the people inside the room.

The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has sold itself as the final word on the climate. Governments spend trillions based on their “Summaries for Policymakers.” The media parrots their press releases. Dissenters are branded “deniers.”

But what happens when the scientists themselves blow the whistle?

A review of internal dissent reveals that forty-six scientists directly tied to the IPCC have either stepped away or spoken out publicly. Their crime? They insisted on evidence-based views that clashed with the official alarmist script. They weren’t “listened to.” Their data didn’t fit the doom-and-gloom narrative.

Don’t take my word for it. Read their own damning testimony below.

The Data They Buried

The IPCC claims its conclusions are ironclad. Yet, these experts allege a pattern of censorship and political manipulation stretching back decades.

On Sea Level Rise: The Missing “No Acceleration”
Dr. Robert Balling calls out the most blatant form of censorship: omission. He notes that the IPCC’s own technical report stated, “No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected.”
That fact never made it to the headlines. It was scrubbed from the Summary for Policymakers. Why? Because a stable sea level doesn’t scare anyone.

On CO2 vs. Temperature: The Causation Flip
Dr. Lucka Bogataj drops a bombshell on the core greenhouse gas hypothesis:
“Rising levels of airborne carbon dioxide don’t cause global temperatures to rise…. temperature changed first and some 700 years later a change in aerial content of carbon dioxide followed.”
Cause and effect. The IPCC has it backwards.

On the “Consensus” Lie
Dr. John Christy—a renowned climatologist who has testified before Congress—exposes the scam:
“Little known to the public is the fact that most of the scientists involved with the IPCC do not agree that global warming is occurring. Its findings have been consistently misrepresented and/or politicized.”
Most do not agree. Let that sink in.

On the Sun: The Forbidden Variable
Dr. Eigil Friis-Christensen reveals the IPCC’s willful blindness:
“The IPCC refused to consider the sun’s effect on the Earth’s climate as a topic worthy of investigation. The IPCC conceived its task only as investigating potential human causes.”
If you only look for human fingerprints, you will ignore the sun, the cosmic rays, and the ocean cycles. That isn’t science; that is a prosecution looking for a crime.

On Model Failure
Dr. Robert Davis points to the empirical failure of the computers:
“Global temperatures have not been changing as state of the art climate models predicted they would. Not a single mention of satellite temperature observations appears in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.”
The models are wrong. The satellites are right. So the IPCC just doesn’t mention the satellites. Convenient.

The Whistleblowers Keep Coming

The list goes on, and each entry is a nail in the coffin of the “settled science” narrative.

• Dr. Judith Curry: “I’m not going to just spout off and endorse the IPCC because I don’t have confidence in the process.”

• Dr. Willem de Lange: “In 1996 the IPCC listed me as… 3000 ‘scientists’ who agreed… I didn’t.” (He was fraudulently listed as a signatory).

• Dr. Chris de Freitas: “The basis for the long-standing claim that carbon dioxide is a major driver… is being questioned. If they have not heard, it is because of the din of global warming hysteria.”

• Dr. John Everett: “I have reviewed the IPCC… and believe that there is not a problem with increased acidification.”

The Grift Rolls On

Despite this mass exodus of experts, the machine doesn’t stop.

Why? Because the grift depends on ignorance. New graduates, fully indoctrinated in universities that preach only one version of the truth, keep repackaging the same scares for the next funding cycle. “Consensus!” they chant. “The Science says!” they scream.

But nature doesn’t care about your narrative.

While politicians panic about a fraction of a degree of hypothetical warming, natural forcings are preparing a different lesson. The Sun is entering a quiescent phase. The jet stream has gone meridional, causing wild swings. Cosmic rays are surging, seeding clouds to reflect sunlight.

The result? We are facing wild swings, followed by a stark possibility the IPCC refuses to model: global cooling.

The Emperor has no clothes. The scientists who actually did the work know it. And now, forty-six of them are finally speaking up.

The only question is: Are you listening—or are you still reading the script?

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method