Zuckerberg Says He was against US govt demand to censor Covid memes
Officials “screamed and cursed” when the platform initially refused, the tech billionaire said
Facebook initially balked at censoring satirical memes about Covid-19 vaccines until US government officials screamed, cursed, and threatened them into doing so, Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of the platform’s parent company Meta, has said.
Speaking on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast on Friday, Zuckerberg addressed his company’s censorship both during the 2020 election and afterward, seemingly blaming it on government pressure.
“I don’t think that the pushing for social media companies to censor stuff was legal,” Zuckerberg told Rogan. “At some level, I do think that having people in the administration calling up the guys on our team and yelling at them and cursing and threatening repercussions if we don’t take down things that are true… it’s pretty bad.”
According to Zuckerberg, the ban on censorship in the US Constitution does not apply to “content moderation” by private companies, “but the First Amendment does apply to government, that’s like the whole point.”
The supposedly offensive content that the White House wanted taken down was a meme featuring a scene from Quentin Tarantino’s ‘Once Upon a Time in Hollywood’, showing Leonardo DiCaprio’s character reacting to something he saw on TV.
The meme implied it would be an ad for a class-action suit for vaccine injuries in about a decade’s time.
President Joe Biden made a vaccine mandate one of the key planks of his Covid-19 policy, and in July 2021, claimed that social media was “killing people” by allowing “misinformation” about the vaccines to be posted.
Jen Psaki, the White House press secretary at the time, revealed that the government was “flagging problematic posts for Facebook,” and even argued that various social media platforms should coordinate their rules and terms of service so that a person “shouldn’t be banned from one platform and not others… for providing misinformation out there.”
Meanwhile, the controversial UK-based NGO Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) claimed that the White House was relying on its research into “superspreaders” of “misinformation.”
Facebook reacted to Biden and Psaki’s comments by saying they had been pushing strongly for vaccines and boasting of having censored 18 million “instances of Covid-19 misinformation” and shadow-banned “167 million pieces of Covid-19 content” deemed untrue by its fact-checkers.
Earlier this week, Zuckerberg announced the end of Facebook’s fact-checking program, describing it as “too politically biased” and counterproductive. “What started as a movement to be more inclusive has increasingly been used to shut down opinions and shut out people with different ideas, and it’s gone too far,” he said.
Having donated over $400 million of his own money to help the Democrats in 2020, Zuckerberg refrained from doing so last November. He also visited President-elect Donald Trump in Florida to make amends and donate to his inauguration fund.
When Rogan pressed him on the censorship of the New York Post’s story about Hunter Biden’s laptop – which got the oldest daily newspaper locked out of Twitter and shadow-banned from Facebook in October 2020 – Zuckerberg dodged the issue.
Meta handed “all the documents” related to censorship efforts over to the House Judiciary Committee, Zuckerberg said, noting that Ohio Republican Jim Jordan put together a report and made it public.
“Well, they lost the election,” he responded, when Rogan asked whether anyone in the current administration was held responsible.
See more here rt.com
Header image: Encyclopedia Britannica
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
VOWG
| #
And that is why he allowed the censorship?
Reply
Tom
| #
Believe this constant liar at your own risk. The real purpose of meta is to be the world’s top spying/data collection/anti-privacy company in the world. The censorship issues are a false flag.
Reply
S.C.
| #
The First Amendment:
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press, or the right of the People to peaceably assemble and petition the government for a redress of grievances. ”
Instead of passing blame, Zuckerberg should try something like this:
“We at Facebook were aware, from the beginning, of Biden Administration efforts to suppress protected speech and knew millions of voters were illegally denied their right to participate in the process.
As one of the largest social platforms on the planet, we should have immediately spoken out and informed the world of this blatant abuse.
Sadly, we instead succumbed to intimidation tactics, complied with tyranny, and failed to do the right thing. For this, we sincerely apologize. ”
Accepting responsibility for your actions is key, Zuck.
We’ll wait.
Reply
Seriously
| #
He’s saying what he can…period. You must all have short memories…they went after him, hard. I suspected their motives at the time…the whole thing stunk to high heaven – can I be the only one who was looking for motive when the government went after him – beyond the smoke, the mirrors- who saw it as a witch hunt?? None if us will ever be privy to all the details or pressure. He ultimately has responsibility for his existence, employees.
The fact that he is saying anything at all is pretty amazing. And I don’t doubt that what started out as his brilliant idea to start his own company, which became an empire, with a rather simple plan, has come to haunt him. He was young, idealistic, when he began, as we ALL have been in our youth. The truth is something you only gain with age, experience. Propoganda (i.e. culture), claims us all, regardless of country of birth – the ‘story” of our particular citizenship is cultivated from our 1st breath. It’s really hard to shake, if your thoughts, ideas, clash with accepted societal norms or accepted beliefs..
. …unless something comes to light that wakes us from the ‘dream’. I suspect Mark has been hit with the sobering realty of what his ‘tiny idea’ – to connect people – has become…and the bad actors that will use his and similar ideas to control all thought in the future.
Reply