Wuhan Shocker: Almost No Asymptomatic Positives in 10m COVID-19 Tests
Newly released study in Nature: Out of 10 million people screened only 300 were asymptomatic positive. This is a very low rate of asymptomatic disease. [1]
A main reason for this lockdown, and the main reason behind healthy people wearing masks, was asymptomatic transmission. According to this large study, asymptomatic transmission is not a problem. Does the New Year’s Eve photo above – contrasting Wuhan to Times Square – now start to make sense to you?
Equally important, only 60% of those 300 asymptomatics who tested positive by PCR were then confirmed positive by viral culture. The false positive rate of PCR testing was 40%. In other words, the number of “cases” we keep hearing about is highly inflated.
Make sure something is actually an issue, before passing sweeping regulations pertaining to said issue.
Caveat emptor: While this study appears to be honest, I am skeptical of any reports from China and skeptical of the peer review process at Nature publications. Both operate with agendas in which the truth and facts are not important unless they happen to serve their agenda.
Now we can see why there were so many on the streets of Wuhan on New Year’s Eve, unlike New York where the real police state is in total control.
[1] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w
Read more from Bud Bromley at budbromley.blog
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Trackback from your site.
Globeinfolive
| #
[…] Trackback from your site. […]
Reply
judy Ryan
| #
How does trackback from your site work? It always seems to return me to the site that I am currently on.
Reply
David Stone CEng
| #
The reason for this result is simply that the Ct threshold for the PCR test is set at a sensible value, rather than the unknown and ridiculous one used in the UK. The number of false positives in the UK is probably around 80-90 % of positive tests! The inventor says 27 is probably the maximum number that gives any kind of reliable result, here possibly as high as 40 is used, around 8000 times more sensitive and likely to find any old bit of rubbish in the sample. PCR is no good for screening symptomless people anyway, it is intended to verify a disease in an ill patient!
Reply
Joseph Olson
| #
“Motive Force Behind All Climate Change” > Climate Realistic, May 14, 2009
“Earth’s Missing Geothermal Flux” > ClimateChangeDepot, April 24, 2011
Many have known about Earth’s variable nuclear furnace for a long time.
Reply
cathleen anderson
| #
I too, am skeptical of any reports coming from China. Wish it was from another source. However, I do believe asymptomatic spread is not possible because an asymptomatic person is NOT sick.
Reply
Alex cumbers
| #
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-afs:Content:9902244410
Reply
Lars Faye
| #
Bringing the truth here. So many people these days are purely headline driven and are ready to grab their pitchforks, when the meat of the story doesn’t actually support their conclusions (that they already came to even before reading it, no doubt).
Reply
Andy
| #
Here is another source re asymptomatic cases – British Medical Journal 21 Dec 2020
https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4851
“The absence of strong evidence that asymptomatic people are a driver of transmission is another good reason for pausing the roll out of mass testing in schools, universities, and communities.”
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Bud,
You wrote: “Now we can see why there were so many on the streets of Wuhan on New Year’s Eve, unlike New York where the real police state is in total control.”
Why do you attempt to deceive PSI readers? The 2021 Chinese New Year hasn’t occurred yet. It occurs on February 12, 2021.
Have a good day, Jerry
Reply