World Health Organisation About to Act Illegally – Again
At the end of May, at the annual World Health Assembly, the World Health Organization votes on amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR)
Supported by Australia, the United States’ proposal was for 80 pages of changes that would turn the WHO into the world health police — 80 pages!
The WHO proposed egregious powers, including the ability to mandate vaccinations, medical procedures, lockdowns and border closures, and to detain individuals without due process.
And yes, Australia really supported that.
However, other nations are rightly now pushing back and as a result, the proposal has been watered down and the regulations are likely to remain advisory.
The WHO faces a dilemma: its constitution and its own IHR prohibit the vote.
According to Schedule 2, Article 55 of the IHR, all matters subject to a vote must be circulated four months in advance.
With only two months remaining, a Department of Health Freedom of Information request (FOI No. 4941) reveals that the changes are still being worked out.
The requirement to provide advance notification to allow member nations time to debate and make decisions has not been met and CANNOT be met at this stage.
Additionally, Article 21 of the WHO’s constitution specifies that the regulations can only cover international measures.
Their constitution does not provide for expanding IHR to cover our own Australian domestic health response, such as the closure of state borders.
The scheduled May 2024 vote is not only contrary to the WHO’s constitution, but also proposes a scope outside its constitution.
I urge the Australian Government not to participate in an illegal vote.
Instead, it should use its influence to ask the WHO to complete the changes first and then provide all members the required four-month notice of an Extraordinary World Health Assembly, specifically for the purpose of debating and voting on these changes.
The rule of law must apply to everyone, including the World Health Organisation.
See more here malcolmrobertsqld.com
Header image: Politico
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
VOWG
| #
These people will have to be eliminated for the good of all free people on the planet, if there are any “free” people left.
Reply
Wisenox
| #
“And yes, Australia really supported that.”
No, they didn’t. Politicians put in place and used as tools acted in favor of nobility instead of the people.
“The WHO faces a dilemma: its constitution and its own IHR prohibit the vote.”
Their own rules require public transparency, but they’ve refused it so far because the negotiations would be too telling. There is a 4 month MANDATORY review process that has been ignored in full, because they have to get things in place before they pull their economic collapse trick.
They want/need a police state to force the slavery, so it’s been all hands on deck to start protests, crime, a rebellion, or anything that gives them the legal excuse to put military on the streets. Don’t fall for it.
“The rule of law must apply to everyone, including the World Health Organisation.”
The powers that be care nothing of laws. They write on their own protections, like the banking whistleblower protections that they will be using soon. They make it impossible in laws to challenge their 5G system, even though research has proven for decades that it harmful. They change laws to suit propaganda use, such as dumbass Roe v Wade crap during fake elections.
The “law” is the nobility’s “shield”, not the people’s, and nobody should be following any laws when they are biased against constitutional and human rights. The treaty is already null and void because they failed to maintain the 4 month public process.
Sort of like the way the EUA is null and void because they failed to uphold requirements II regarding known risks (they ARE liable).
Reply
MICHAEL CLARKE
| #
Divide and Conquer!
Reply