Wind & Solar Generators Couldn’t Care Less
Solar panels smothered with snow and ice produce nothing; wind turbines frozen solid during breathless, frigid weather produce even less (they actually consume power from the grid to run heating systems meant to prevent their internal workings suffering permanent damage).
So, if you’re sitting freezing in the dark, don’t expect wind and solar power generators to come to your rescue.
No, if the lights and power are on this winter, then you ought to raise a glass for the gas, coal and nuclear power generators separating you and your loved ones from a date with hypothermia and, ultimately, the morgue.
Hundreds died during the Big Freeze that hit Texas in February 2021, thanks to a complete collapse in wind and solar output.
Thousands more would have died, but for the reliable output delivered by coal, gas and nuclear plants.
As this piece from Alberta attests, the wind and solar industries couldn’t care less whether you freeze to death when winter bites:
Freezing to Fight Global Warming
Substack
Penguin Empire Reports
14 January 2024
Some things look great on paper until they are tested with the cold, hard reality.
For years, the province of Alberta, Canada looked like a decent place to build large scale wind projects. Alberta has wide open, windy spaces.
So, in the name of fighting global warming (AKA raking in government subsidies) wind developers built nearly 4,500MWs of wind capacity as of January 2024.
Solar’s installed capacity sits at 1650MWs for a combined wind and solar capacity of just over 6100MWs.
In January of 2024, Alberta’ wind turbines faced one of their most serious tests to date: a Polar Vortex pushed artic air down through Canada and into the United States. Temperatures plummeted, sending Alberta’s grid demand sky high.
CBC news reported on Friday January 12th that “Just before sunrise in Edmonton, temperatures hit lows of –37C (-34.6F), breaking a daily record of –32 (-25F) set in 1998.”
And it got colder.
On Friday night going into Saturday (13th) at Edmonton International Airport, temperatures dropped to -45C (-49F) by 10pm (according to weather.gov.ca).
As astute readers may know, a grid consumes electricity as it’s produced. If Alberta needs 12,000MWs of power, it has to produced 12,000MWs of power at the same instant (more or less).
If the real-time supply and demand gets out of whack, the ‘pressure’ on the grid drops, forcing grid operators to call on other generators, force customers to reduce demand, or initiate rolling blackouts.
And no grid should run at 100% capacity. A grid should keep some capacity in reserve. If your largest plant suddenly runs into trouble and has to be pulled offline, you want more than enough standby capacity to plug that gap.
And, even the best generators might struggle to provide maximum output during extreme weather. So, to safely operate, a grid wants to keep some standby capacity, well in excess of peak demand.
During the polar Vortex, Alberat’s grid demand skyrocket, hitting 10,000, 11,000, and more than 12,000MWs of demand. To supply that demand, Alberta’s gas plants have run hard, and the province had to rely on imports.
Of course, at night, Alberta’s 1650 MWs of solar were completely useless.
And wind output failed too. On the night of Jan 12-13, during the record-breaking cold temperatures, wind output stood at only 14MWs at 2115hrs. That wasn’t the lowest either.
Early in the evening, wind output stood at 8-10MWs. But 8MWs would barely show up on the chart. So, we’re going with output at 2115hrs.
No, that’s not an exaggeration. Basically, Alberta’s wind was missing when the grid needed it most.
While the exact wind and solar output varied, it remained extremely low for the past few days, based on data from Alberta’s Electricity System Operator.
With Alberta’s wind and solar output basically not existent, natural gas plants, coal, hydro and imports are keeping the grid operating. Yet even with those dispatchable resources, some suffered issues and had to be pulled offline.
While the cold snap is still ongoing, there are two major issues.
The extreme cold brought with it a wind drought as the cold air stagnated over the region. Here’s a snapshot of Edmonton Airport wind speed Jan 12-13. Yes, Edmonton Airport doesn’t report wind speed at rotor height, but it gives you a fairly decent idea.
As astute readers may know, for a commercial wind turbine to operate, it needs wind speeds to be at least somewhere between 6-11 MPH (~10-17 KM/hr) (depending on turbine type). This is known as the ‘cut-in’ speed when the wind turbine starts to operate.
Plus, wind power is a function of wind speed cubed. If you double the wind speed, you increase the wind power potential by 8x. It goes the other way as well. When wind speed drops to 1/2, you go down to just 1/8th of the potential power.
In addition to reduced wind speed, wind turbines aren’t designed to operate at extremely cold temperatures.
General Electric (one of North America’s major turbine manufacturer) published a 2022 “GE Renewable Energy’s Cold Weather Solutions” document. In it, GE reported that:
GE Renewable Energy wind turbines are available from the factory with either a Standard Weather (STW) or Cold Weather Extreme (CWE) package.
Standard Weather turbines have a minimum operating temperature limit of -15ºC (5ºF) while the Cold Weather Extreme turbines have a minimum operating temperature limit of -30ºC (-22ºF).
If you have moderately cold weather (above -22F), wind operators can do things like install heaters and change out lubricants, so they don’t freeze up the rotor. If the blades ice up, operators can apply de-icing agents to the blades to reduce the weight and reduce the hazard of flinging ice shards off as the blades spin.
But there’s only so much you can do for extremely cold temperatures, dropping below -22F.
Why?
Turbines are made up of metals and plastics. And they are designed to rotate with extreme leverages and forces placed where the rotator and blades meet.
When temperatures drop extremely low, metals and plastics tend to shrink, become brittle, and lose flexibility, running the risk of creating micro fractures in a turbine’s assembly.
Continued operations at extreme temperatures run the risk of permanently damaging the turbine, if not all together leading to catastrophic failure.
But that’s not all. Here is the shocking bit to pay attention to in the context of the extreme weather in Alberta. GE added:
“For CWE (Cold weather extreme turbines), the electrical components, gearbox and generator are designed to survive, not operate, down to -40ºC (-40ºF)” (emphasis added).
And Alberta hit -49F.
While we’ll have to see how long the extreme weather lasts and what impact it will have on the provinces’ turbines, it’s fair to say that at least some turbines could potentially see an increased risk of long-term damage if the extreme cold continues.
If our leadership was paying attention, this wind disaster in Alberta should put a serious chill on pushing wind power as a viable solution, not if you want to see a resilient grid that is able to withstand extreme winter temperatures.
Cold weather can kill, and it’s when people need a grid to be the most reliable. Yet as we’re watching in real time in Alberta, the only reason the province isn’t literally freezing to death is because the province still has a massive amount of gas power plants, some hydro and coal, and enough transmission connections to keep the lights on.
We’ll leave you with this screen shot from the Alberta Electricity System Operator on 1/12/2024 at 2115hrs. (According to power-technology.com, 900MW of gas at Cascade is finalizing construction. It’s backed out for the following calculations.)
At that time, gas produced at ~84 percent of its capacity. Coal was running at 99 percent, hydro at ~35 percent, solar zero, and wind…at 0.3 percent of nameplate capacity.
If Alberta had listened to the greens’ siren song and traded away more of its coal and natural gas plants for wind and solar, then we might be watching Alberta literally freeze to death in the name of fighting global warming.
See more here stopthesethings.com
Bold emphasis added
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Howdy
| #
On the other hand… From:
https://www.euronews.com/green/2024/01/18/do-wind-turbines-break-in-cold-snaps-heres-how-the-tech-keeps-turning-in-freezing-temperat
“Wind energy is fast becoming the backbone of electricity grids in Europe, meeting almost a fifth of the region’s power needs.”
“So wind turbines can clearly stand strong in cold climates. But, as with other renewables, green energy sceptics like to talk them down.”
On an intermittent basis of course, thus not dependable, so not included in any kind of reasonable calculation. What is the average then?
“The primary issue with the wind turbines in Texas is that such extreme cold weather was not expected based on the historical record of weather, and therefore the developers did not weatherize the wind turbines,”
Now hang on a minute. There is all this nonsense about planetary climate into 2050, world wide, yet theses people could not foresee a local event with any degree of competency?
“Indeed, Texas saw a much bigger shortfall in natural gas—which supplies most of the state’s electricity5—than in wind energy during that freeze, because the state’s natural gas infrastructure, too, had not been weatherized for extreme cold”
https://climate.mit.edu/ask-mit/it-true-wind-turbines-dont-work-winter
Make of it what you will. I am far more inclined to take information from the PSI article in this instance.
Reply
Wisenox
| #
Just stopping by to say thank you Principia.
Even though I know my posts don’t travel many miles across the internet, I can post.
I’ve been really anxious to meet up with the disinformation tools from the WEF. I wanted to get into a debate with one online, so I ventured out and posted at a few sites. Nothing crazy, just public verifiable information from patents. However, I was banned from 2 sites within 4 hours of each other, and had a 3rd post removed for allegedly being ‘spam’.
Reply