WHO’s Rules Embedded Undemocratic “Voting”
When the delegates don’t want their constituents to know how they voted on a controversial matter, such as handing sovereignty of their nation over to the WHO, they can simply decide to hold a secret ballot. And the decision to hold a secret ballot may not be recorded or held by roll call. Sweet, huh?
It gets better. The ballots are moved into another room to be counted. Is that room in Arizona? Tammany Hall?
Elections are held by secret ballot. Or not.
Maybe there will be no vote to elect a candidate or slate of candidates. Instead there will be horse trading.
This is how it works at the agency that wants to control your medical care, what you are allowed to see, and manage pandemic “prevention” for the world by collecting, creating and housing more deadly pathogens.
They would be happy to invoke One Health to manage the entire world—if you let them.
From the WHO Constitution, page 193
See more here substack.com
Header image: bucketeer / amazonaws-2
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Wisenox
| #
They’re arguing about countries getting their fair share of the profits, and countries such as Africa want inclusion to make vaccines if their own.
The nobility running the WHO don’t want to let that happen.
Reply