What will it take to recognise the COVID “vaccine” disaster?

Written by Phillip Altman on October 11, 2023. Posted in Current News

The COVID-19 gene-based so-called “vaccines” were released to the public despite major deficiencies in clinical trial safety and efficacy data

Without qualification, these injections were declared to be “safe and efficacious”…….we now know this is not true.

Having been released in Australia under “Provisional Approval” (and in other jurisdictions using similar abbreviated regulatory “approvals”), it fell to the established post-release voluntary adverse drug reporting systems (such as the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) or to Australia’s Drug Adverse Event Notification (DAEN) scheme to pick up safety issues.

These voluntary reporting systems are not transparent and they under report adverse reactions by estimated factors of somewhere between 20 to 100 times (as I have previously reported a number of times in this Substack).

Worst still, these systems are easily corrupted to effectively minimise the reporting of adverse events (to fit the government narrative of “safe”) by making it difficult or complicated to report, changing definitions of “vaccinated” vs “unvaccinated”, omitting codes for adverse event descriptions (eg. “death”), delaying the analysis of data etc.

In addition, health professionals suspect that the professional health regulator (AHPRA, Australian Professional Health Regulatory Agency) which responsible for continued permission to practice, is watching who reports and what they report in terms of adverse events for COVID-19 “vaccines”.

It is my own view that the under reporting of COVID-19 “vaccine” adverse events is probably over 100x. The Australian DAEN system appears especially corrupted as it is only admitting to 14 “vaccine” deaths so far.

The US VAERS system is reporting more than 36,000!

So…..how can one really assess the safety of the COVID-19 “vaccines” if the original clinical trial and animal safety data was grossly inadequate and the post-release adverse drug reaction systems are (apparently) corrupted or manipulated to minimise safety signals?

The answer is official statistics of ALL CAUSE MORTALITY or EXCESS MORTALITY ie the total number of deaths from all causes above that expected compared to previous non-COVID years.

This data (the absolute number of deaths) is a powerful statistic to determine if the COVID-19 “vaccines” overall prevented death and, if analysed correctly, could be used to determine the safety of the COVID-19 “vaccines” by reporting the number of Excess Deaths in the “vaccinated” vs “unvaccinated” populations.

We already know that the Excess Death rate has skyrocketed across the world since the introduction of the COVID-19 “vaccines”.

If the COVID-19 “vaccines” prevent death (as claimed), then what is causing the surge in Excess Deaths?

One approach to try and answer this question is to pull out the numbers of deaths according to vaccination status ie “vaccinated” vs “unvaccinated” deaths. But this is not easy to do. Why is it not easy to do?

This is a critical statistic. Why is this not being reported?

It appears that health bureaucrats are going out of their way NOT to collect this important data. For example, NSW hospital statistics use to report this data on a weekly basis until it showed that almost everybody in hospital with COVID-19 was fully vaccinated and boosted – they stopped reporting these statistics 31 Dec. 2022.

There are people who are particularly skilled at data analysis and I interface with them on a regular basis. I am not a statistician or data analyst but I closely follow what is being reported in relation to Excess Deaths.

One such recent report issued anonymously on 23 Sept. (CLICK HERE to view), using data extracted from the UK’s Office of National Statistics, showed there were 154,300 Excess Deaths due to the COVID-19 “vaccines” in the UK.

Dr. John Campbell picked up this Substack report and based one of his popular video podcasts on this data. It has caused a real storm.

The UK government has been notably silent but their unofficial campaign propagandist organisation (BBC) has sprung into action to defend the Excess Death claims (CLICK HERE to listen, start about 6:16 onwards).

It seems that we are living in a post-science era where highly paid and well connected so-called “fact-checkers” and highly censored medical literature publications have become the arbiters of truth.

Why is it not the responsibility of government to be transparent and fully investigate this important question?

Why leave it to individuals (or conflicted organisations) to pull out this critical information which is vital to the public interest?

All we want is the truth.

See more here substack.com

Bold emphasis added

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About Covid 19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.