what “safe and effective” means according to the CDC
Safe means tested in 50 people and nobody died and only four needed professional medical attention. Effective means there is NO evidence whatsoever of a clinical benefit. Got it?
The CDC now recommends updated Covid-19 vaccines for everyone 6 months and older. Here’s the CNN story on the CDC approval.
What is the evidence for safety and effectiveness?
- It was tested on 50 people and only eight percent needed to see a doctor after the shot. And none of the 50 people died!
- There was no evidence whatsoever it had a clinically meaningful benefit for anyone.
- It wasn’t tested on anyone under 12, but was being recommended for 6 months and older. Only one CDC panel member had a problem with this. The rest of the ACIP committee members (outside committee of the CDC) didn’t seem to mind recommending it for people it was never tested on.
We now have clear evidence that the FDA simply ignores evidence which doesn’t support the narrative
Watch this video. Basically, in a meeting with top FDA officials including Peter Marks that was secretly (but not illegally) recorded, the FDA experts admit that if the data doesn’t support their narrative (even if it is from a gold standard randomized controlled trial), they ignore it (listen starting at around the 4:00 minute mark).
And a huge failure of the VAERS system (a 7 year old dies shortly after the vax from cardiac arrest and there is no follow up) doesn’t shock the FDA officials. They said to send them an email about it.
Watch the video and read the entire thread
Summary
If you think that the CDC and FDA exist to protect you from unsafe medical products, you are very badly mistaken. The two examples provided in this very short article should make this very clear to anyone.
See more here substack.com
Header image: Associated Press / David Goldman
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About Covid 19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Wisenox
| #
Here they go again. They keep pushing “safe and effective” and “mask mandates”. They are trying to drive the people into a response or protest.
Protesting either of these will get you subverted. They are easily twisted into “we’re doing it for safety” and you will be deemed unruly.
This is all blatantly obvious to anyone whose been looking. Florida started the ball rolling with the “safe and effective” setup. In fact, Florida Republicans have been trying to deceive their constituents about DNA reverse transcription and LINE1. The problem? The study they reference is the garbage swedish study that’s full of conflicts of interest.
Why would they use LINE1 anyway? They have CRISPR/CAS9.
They keep setting the seed for people to rise up, but they keep doing it with reasons that will get us subverted. It’s plain to see that the government is against you.
Don’t fall for any of it. If you protest, make sure the reasons are things they have to answer for and are not twistable.
For example, protesting the presence of carbon nanotubes in the patents.
Don’t be fooled, or you will be enslaved.
Reply
Wisenox
| #
The first post was this morning, it’s now night and wouldn’t you know it, now more covid celebrities are jumping in on “safe and effective”:
“The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has “gone rogue,” according to virologist Dr. Robert Malone, who accused the federal agency of sacrificing its own rules and regulations with its decision to recommend the latest batch of COVID-19 boosters, which only have limited clinical trial data attesting to their efficacy and safety.”
This isn’t Malone’s first time trying to rile the people up to protest.
Their stuck on loop, and they want their “land of rebels” to conquer. Have to assume its all preparatory and that something may happen soon.
Reply