WEF: Schwab replaced by WEF clone. George Christensen reports

Written by Michael Darby on May 1, 2025. Posted in Current News

Dear friend,

The globalist house of cards is shaking—and not a moment too soon.

Klaus Schwab, the unelected overlord of the World Economic Forum, the man who smiled as he promised you’d “own nothing and be happy,” has fallen. Not stepped down gracefully. Not retired honourably. Fallen. Dragged out by a tidal wave of whistleblower allegations so shocking, so brazen, they make a mockery of the moral superiority he’s cloaked himself in for decades.

• Klaus Schwab was forced out of the World Economic Forum after whistleblowers exposed years of financial misconduct and abuse of power.
• Leaked accounts revealed Schwab used WEF funds for personal luxuries, while promoting austerity and control through globalist policies.
• His replacement, Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, built a legacy at Nestlé marked by human rights violations and ruthless resource monopolies.
• The leadership change signals a deeper entrenchment of the WEF’s agenda, not a shift in direction or values.
• Nations must cut ties with WEF-driven initiatives to halt the spread of surveillance, corporate control, and digital oppression.

---

However… don’t expect the globalists to let one of their own go without a cover-up. The World Economic Forum, in its polished press releases and hushed board meetings, tried to spin his departure as part of a planned “transition.” But the truth broke through the PR fog. Schwab was forced out after an anonymous letter—penned by current and former WEF staff—blew the lid off a regime of excess, arrogance, and abuse.

According to those inside the belly of the beast, Schwab used junior staffers as personal cash couriers, withdrew thousands for his own use, and billed luxury in-room massages to the Forum’s accounts. His wife Hilde, a central figure in the WEF’s operations, allegedly arranged lavish getaways disguised as business trips. Together, the Schwabs used a multi-million-dollar WEF-owned villa—paid for by corporate donors—as their personal retreat. This wasn’t a glitch in the system. This was the system.

And while Schwab pampered himself on your dime, he preached austerity to you. He demanded the world submit to “stakeholder capitalism,” digital IDs, central bank surveillance, ESG tyranny, and climate lockdowns—all under the banner of “The Great Reset.” When COVID hit, he didn’t mourn. He mobilised. In his own words, it was a “narrow but unique window” to “revamp all aspects of our societies.” He called for stronger, more aggressive governments, and pushed for a “Fourth Industrial Revolution” where not only your work and money, but your very identity would be transformed.

He spoke fondly of implantable microchips. Of biometric monitoring. Of AI-run systems to govern your life. He wasn’t joking. He wasn’t theorising. He was planning. His books outlined it. His speeches confirmed it. The goal was never health, or equity, or sustainability. The goal was control. Global control.

But now, the wizard has been dragged from behind the curtain. The WEF board, facing internal revolt and global scrutiny, met in crisis over Easter. They ousted their figurehead. But instead of repentance, they doubled down. They chose as Schwab’s replacement another globalist titan—one with an even darker corporate legacy.

Enter Peter Brabeck-Letmathe.

The man whose name the media barely mentions. The former CEO of Nestlé—the world’s largest food and beverage conglomerate. The man who once said, cold as steel, “Water is not a human right.” (LINK)

He wasn’t speaking metaphorically. Under his leadership, Nestlé bought up global water rights, extracting billions in profits while towns like Flint, Michigan choked on poison.

While Schwab dreamed of digital prisons, Brabeck perfected resource monopolies—commodifying the most basic human needs, and locking down supply chains with ruthless efficiency. Nestlé’s global expansion under his watch wasn’t just about chocolate bars and instant coffee. It was about empire-building.

Brabeck ran Nestlé from 1997 to 2008, and the company’s history during those years reads like a corporate dystopia.

In 2005, a lawsuit was filed against Nestlé on behalf of trafficked children from Mali, who claimed they were forced into slavery on cocoa plantations in the Ivory Coast—plantations Nestlé sourced from. The plaintiffs alleged that Nestlé not only knew, but incentivised cost-cutting practices that led to forced child labour, beatings, and years of stolen childhood. Nestlé, of course, denied any wrongdoing. But the accusations were damning—and during Brabeck’s tenure, the company fought tooth and nail to avoid accountability.

Meanwhile, back in the Philippines, union leader Diosdado Fortuna—who led a workers’ strike against Nestlé—was assassinated in 2005. Shot twice in the chest, just like his predecessor years before. Brabeck never faced consequences. No outrage. No inquiries. Just profits and promotions.

This is the man now chairing the World Economic Forum.

Let that sink in.

The WEF isn’t reforming. It’s reloading. It’s shedding its old skin, hoping to deceive the world into believing it has changed. But the core is the same. The ideology is the same. And the mission is the same.

Once, the WEF was a simple business forum—born as the European Management Forum in 1971, intended to help European companies learn American-style competitiveness. But Schwab, ever the megalomaniac, transformed it into a vehicle for global social engineering. What started as trade talk turned into a shadow government for the 21st century—one where billionaires, unelected officials, and self-righteous celebrities gather each year to decide your future without asking you.

And now, the same machine is running, only with Brabeck at the wheel.

Make no mistake—this is not over. Schwab’s resignation is not a victory yet. It’s an opening. A crack in the foundation. A moment we must seize before they patch it over with another layer of corporate gloss.

Because this system thrives in secrecy. It survives on compliance. And it advances every time a citizen shrugs and says, “That’s just how it is.”

No. That’s not how it has to be. Not in your country. Not in mine. Not anywhere.

It’s time to sever all ties to this cabal of control. Nations must withdraw from WEF-aligned initiatives, end cooperation with its technocratic offshoots, and purge every public policy infected by its ideology. That means rejecting digital ID schemes. That means killing net-zero mandates designed by billionaires. That means returning power to the people—not to a boardroom in Geneva.

Klaus Schwab is out. But the globalist machine marches on.

It’s our job to block it. To expose it. To dismantle it. Piece by piece.

And we start by never letting them rewrite this moment. Schwab didn’t retire. He ran. And the man replacing him isn’t a saviour—he’s proof that the system still thinks it can win.

Let’s prove it wrong.

Until next time, God bless you, your family and nation.

Take care,

George Christensen

Michael Darby’s comment on Nestlé.

For very many decades Nestlé has pushed the message worldwide that breastfeeding is backward and prmitive, and that all modern women must instead force “infant formula” upon their babies. Papua New Guinea is just one example of a “market” where countless mothers have been propaganised and bullied into denying their babies the natural immunity inherent in mothers’ milk. Instead, mothers have been induced to threaten the health of their infants by mixing formula with unsafe and potentially polluted water for delivery through unhygenic bottles and teats.

There was always plenty of opportunity for profit in marketing safe supplements for nursing mothers. Not enough for Nestlé. I have an imperfect recollection of writing to this effect (as John Ainslie) in the Wagga Daily Advertiser in 1973.

Here is the LINK to the International Baby Food Network. In the days before WHO’s health focus was replaced by the current malign political focus, in 1981, the 34th General Assembly of the World Health Organisation adopted resolution WHA34.22, which included the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes.

---

Australian Federal Election Day, 3 May 2025

Principled Move by the One Nation team

The One Nation Team has recommended that Nationals and Liberals be preferenced ahead of Labor, Greens and Teals. Moreover, in key seats the One Nation How-To-Vote is reportedly recommending that all of the above be preferenced ahead of the Trumpet of Patriots candidate, in response to the ill-advised Trumpet of Patriots decision to place sitting members last.

If proved correct, and One Nation supporters take notice of their Party’s HTV, this will be a heavy blow to the prospects of individual Trumpet of Patriots candidates and also to the prospects of Trumpet of Patriots Senate candidates.

---

Death of the Pope

George Christensen and I may differ on some issues. In all circumstances I can vouch for his integrity and sincerity. His viewpoint deserves to be heard.

George Christensen @NationFirstAust writes:

The death of Pope Francis is the final chapter in one of the most divisive and destructive papacies in modern Church history. I was at the Vatican on Easter Sunday 2018. Metres away from him. He passed by in the popemobile. The crowd roared. But what legacy did he leave?

Francis’ pontificate will be remembered for confusion, contradiction, and a catastrophic fracturing of doctrine. While the Church was bleeding members in the West, he opened the doors to ideas that would’ve made even the 1960s modernists blush.

This is not just about Catholics. This matters to anyone who values truth, order, faith, and the moral bedrock of the West. The Roman Catholic Church, still the largest Christian body in the world, has a gravitational pull that shapes Christianity’s direction globally.

And what of Francis’ theology? In Singapore, he declared “all religions are a path to God.”

He compared them to different languages. Bishop Joseph Strickland urged him to say clearly: “Jesus Christ is the only Way. To deny this is to deny Him.”

This wasn’t a one-off. In 2018, a boy asked if his atheist father was in Heaven. Francis responded, “God won’t abandon him.” It sounds compassionate and it’s great PR but scripture and Catholic doctrine affirm: those who reject Christ do not inherit eternal life.

In a post to social media platform X after Francis’ death became news, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò recalled that 2018 Scalfari interview in which Francis reportedly said: “There is no hell, sinful souls simply disappear.”

Viganò wrote: “His soul has not disappeared, nor has it dissolved: he will have to account for the crimes he has committed, first of all having usurped the throne of Peter in order to destroy the Catholic Church and lose so many souls.”

He continued: “But if this non-pope and anti-pope can no longer harm the Mystical Body, his heirs still remain, the subversives whom he has invalidly created ‘cardinals’… It is on these people that the greatest responsibility for the outcome of the next conclave falls.”

Viganò’s mention of non-pope and anti-pope may bewilder some. However, many Catholics — including canonists and theologians — have questioned the validity of Francis’ election, citing murky resignation wording from Benedict XVI or pre-conclave politicking.

Worse, he’s left behind a College of Cardinals stacked with ideological clones — men who share his vision of a “synodal Church,” pluralistic, progressive, and allergic to clarity. The next pope may be even worse.

And synodality? Francis’ beloved project led to the Synod on Synodality — a global mess that encouraged heresy. Germany’s synod voted to bless same-sex unions and support abortion. Bishops nodded along. Francis looked the other way.

Then there were the scandals. In 2019, he allowed pagan Pachamama idols to be honoured at the Vatican. They were even placed near altars. Catholics across the world were horrified. Paganism was literally welcomed into the heart of Christendom.

An Austrian Catholic, Alexander Tschugguel, heroically dumped the idols into the Tiber River. Francis later apologised — not for the idolatry, but to the offended pagans. This wasn’t evangelisation. This was apostasy.

In 2017, Dutch abortion advocate Lilianne Ploumen was awarded the papal Order of St. Gregory. She bragged it confirmed her work. The Vatican later claimed it was just a diplomatic formality. Yet the Pope never revoked it.

Meanwhile, a stalwart pro-life priest Fr. Frank Pavone who ran Priests for Life was defrocked because he went too hard with visuals on social media. He was actually accused of blasphemy for his pro-life posts.

Even the Vatican’s top doctrinal appointee — Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández — once wrote about “theology of the kiss” and argued that in a good kiss “there’s theology” and “a little orgasm.” This is the man who oversaw doctrine under Francis.

Cardinal Orgasmo had a lot to do with Fiducia Supplicans — the Vatican doc that greenlit blessings for same-sex couples. It upended centuries of Catholic teaching by normalising sin under the guise of “pastoral care.” Even faithful prelates called it heretical.

This has been more than a “liberal pope.” This has been a slow-moving spiritual train wreck. Francis hollowed out the Faith, confused the flock, appeased the wolves, and paved the way for something darker.

FOLLOW ME here on X

@NationFirstAust

and SUBSCRIBE to my newsletter and blog at

http://nationfirst.com.au

— because we will keep holding the line against this collapse.

Thanks to George Christensen.

Michael Darby Comments:

Trevor Loudon’s book, helpfully brought to attention by renowned freedom campaigner Charles Kovess, highlights the importance of rejecting the Uniparty mob’s ALP-inspired false assertion that the major political parties are the same. Responsible voters who care about Australia see the difference and should vote accordingly. Make judgements based on how candiates allocate preferences.

Freedom Candidates who preference Nationals/ Liberals ahead of Teals ahead of Labor ahead of Greens in that order deserve support. I shall preference Nationals/ Liberals ahead of Teals ahead of Labor ahead of Greens in that order. Forthe Senate I shall vote on the same basis, while being sure to number every column above the line so that the value of my vote is maximised.

Please encourage everyone to do likewise by sharing to your mailing list THIS LINK to this substack. In any column of the Senate ballot paper it is fine to vote below the line if you wish.

Robert Balzola Writes:

Mon 21/04/2025 10:52 AM

Oh now you realise it.

In 1984 when I was on the Young Labor Council State Executive fighting in the Right Wing to nearly defeat him by less than 7 votes that would have ended his Career then, no one paid any attention.

No one engaging in direct Party Politics, see these tyrants rise to power then after they reach High Civic Office you right Memoire After Thoughts about the RLG (Radical Leadership Group) and its infiltration in contemporary Australian Politics I have been fighting with real people in real branches in in real politics over a lifetime.

This is the Real Australia. Reading about the takeover on Memes and watching it on TV whilst taking no action whatsoever.

Sincerely,
Robert Balzola

Robert Balzola and Associates (Legal) Pty Ltd

By email of Wednesday, 16 April 2025, Peter Newland, author of Elections and Voting for Dummies, writes:

I agree with Monica Smit, yet your second item knocking my 2-step strategy is totally wrong.

Sincere thanks to all who helpfully forward to friends the Michael Darby in Australia substack. Instead of forwarding, please SHARE THIS LINK TO THIS SUBSTACK.

THE LINK saves on data transmission and allows the recipients to see corrections and updates. Please also recommend to friends and post the link to social media.

NEW POLICY FOR THIS SUBSTACK

This elderly commentator on important issues can no longer afford to feed the cats while maintaining a significant research effort involving high communications and software costs to deliver valuable material to nearly ten thousand recipients of whom less than one fifth of one percent (God bless them!) are paid subscribers. I intend to keep feeding the cats, with your help. The substack system requires a minimum annual payment of $50 for a paid subscriber, but allows incentives to paid subscribers. Here are the incentives:

1. First up, until further notice every new paid subscription of $50 will be immediately upgraded to a ten-year subscription.
2. Secondly, every paid subscriber, including existing paid subscribers, will have unrestricted access to a growing audio library of Australian poetry recorded by me in my capacity as current Bush Poetry Champion of Australia. An example of an Australian poetry recording with my voice, is the wonderful Henry Lawson poem “The Fire at Ross’s Farm”, at this link. This version was produced by star audio engineer Peter Kukura. Some of my audio tracks are similarly enhanced.
3. Thirdly, for every book written or edited by me during your ten-year subscription, you will receive a personalised pdf by email. In case you have not yet read Unchain Australia (August 2021), here is the link.

VICTIMS OF VACCINE HARM AND SIMILAR GOVERNMENTAL OVERREACH: You will always be entitled to paid subscription status at no charge. To secure your paid status, email “Paid status please” with your name and phone number to [email protected].

The leading article of each Michael Darby in Australia Substack begins with an introduction available to all. The bulk of the article will often (but not always) be reserved for paid subscribers. This is standard practice by a very large number of substack writers. Thank you for your understanding, your cooperation and your dollars. The cats will be even more grateful than I am.

See more here Substack

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.