WEF Open Forum In Davos Called Off Following Death Threats
The World Economic Forum (WEF) has announced that its public ‘Open Forum‘ set to take place in Davos in January next year has been canceled due to death threats.
The union of elite globalists under the leadership of Klaus Schwab has caused such a wave of anger from populations worldwide that security measures of the other WEF events have also been increased, reports Swiss news outlet Südostschweiz.
As anger against the WEF has grown since the pandemic, various employees and attendees have received increasing levels of abuse with some even receiving death threats.
Yann Zopf, head of media at WEF, said about the threats:
“We receive dozens of threats every day on social media and by email. But it also happens that employees and attendees of the forum are approached personally.
Even the application form for jobs at the WEF on its homepage is misused for insults of all kinds.”
Zopf added that security at this year’s Open Forum could not be guaranteed.
“We have informed the authorities and are working closely with them.
The decision to cancel the event was very difficult for us. Everyone should be able to take part in the events and discussions, that is the idea of the Open Forum.”
The Open Forum was started in 2003 as a response to criticism of the WEF regarding its secretive and elite nature and was supposed to be a place where members of the public could come and ask questions.
However, due to security concerns, the public event has now been canceled.
The event was expected to take place from January 17th to 21st in Davos under the motto “Working Together, Restoring Trust”.
See more here: thecovidworld.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
very old white guy
| #
people hate communism.
Reply
Stephen
| #
At this stage only threats?
Reply
Bobby Maxwell
| #
On the one hand, it gives me hope that people are awakening to the fact Klaus Schwab and his fellow “stakeholders” have declared the 99% of us “useless unemployables” at the mercy of whatever austerity serfdom they decide from their lofty position to render us! On the other hand, this is certainly an auspicious turn of events for The WEF! The moment they deign to provide the “useless eaters” a brief glimpse of transparency; they are forced to rescind it.
Reply
don johnson
| #
“Working Together, Restoring Trust”. The truth is the opposite of what they say.
Reply
Paul
| #
Oh, so they believe in free speech!
Reply
Bobby Maxwell
| #
On the one hand, it gives me hope that people are awakening to the fact Klaus Schwab and his fellow “stakeholders” have declared the 99% of us “useless unemployables” at the mercy of whatever austerity serfdom they decide from their lofty position to render us! On the other hand, this is certainly an auspicious turn of events for The WEF! The moment they deign to provide the “useless eaters” a brief glimpse of transparency; they are forced to rescind it.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi PSI Readers,
I ask: How is it that my favorite meteorology author R. C. Sutcliffe (Weather and Climate) in the first paragraph of his introduction wrote “It [meteorology] was, and is, difficult science to reduce to its basic principles and so present as a deductive structure, and it was another of the environmental sciences, astronomy, the very limited positional astronomy of the solar system, which was first illuminated by the light of Newton’s genius.”???
Another reader might question: What is the Problem? The problem is whom Sutcliffe has ignored. And this reader might have to ask: Whom has Sutcliffe ignored? Can any other PSI Reader tell this fictitious reader whom Sutcliffe ignored? And if so, can this alert PSI Reader give us a plausible reason that Sutcliffe ignored this well known former scientist?
I will wait to a give these alert PSI Readers a chance to answer the questions that I have proposed. My money is on that the VOWG will be among the first. After which other PSI Readers, who did not even try to answer these question will begin to question the validity of my questions and/or his answers.
Have a good day, Jerry
Reply