We Need More Carbon Dioxide, Not Less

The climate is a chaotic system and is non-linear with multiple inputs, especially from solar, wind, clouds, ocean currents and the earths declination. C02 is a very small piece in the puzzle.

Therefore, computer modeling the future of our climate is very imprecise and mostly unhelpful as the IPCC preditions thus far have shown as none have been accurate. Greenland had this name for a reason and the record shows it has been much warmer and ice free in the past.

This is very important because the AGW theory is that C02 life giving gas is making the planet unusually warm. Not true. We are in an interglacial period going back 10,000 years where the planet has been gradually warming. Notwithstanding, Antarctica is the largest glacier covering an area of 90% of all glaciers and is expanding for the past 60 years.

If you refer to this scientific summary you will see the climate alarmists are being ridiculous to believe (like a religion) that human’s are making any tangible difference with increased amounts of C02 in the atmosphere – Climate change science and the climate change scare No 7 November 17/2015 issue # 24 We need more C02 not less – ‬

‪react-text: 1739 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-biuanF5eY
http://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2016/08/04/global-warming-greenland-ice-sheet-hazardous-waste-military-base/88116442/?csp=dailybriefing
Yes, Greenland glacier is melting, but the larger (x 10) Antarctica glacier is expanding far more freezing billions of tons of water. Glaciers have been melting for more than 150 years without any impact from human CO2.

Climate change patterns are chaotic lasting tens of thousands of years. Eg. the Washington Post 93 years ago, in 1922 published this climate alarm – “”The Arctic Ocean is warming up, icebergs are becoming scarcer …Great masses of ice have been replaced by moraines of earth and stones….Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers all point to a radical change in climate conditions…

Within a few years it is predicted that due to the ice melt the sea will rise and make most coastal cities uninhabitable. “ react-text: 1168 http://www.dailywire.com/…/most-comprehensive-assault /react-text … /‬
‪Today’s temperatures are much lower than those that were predominant during the Holocene era as substantiated from Greenland’s ice sheet proving Greenland’s melting today is natural.‬

The Most Comprehensive Assault On ‘Global Warming’ Ever
By Mike Van Biezen

9. Glaciers have been melting for more than 150 years

The notion of melting glaciers as prove positive that global warming is real has no real scientific basis.  Glaciers have been melting for over 150 years.  It is no secret that glaciers advanced to unprecedented levels in recent human history during the period known as the Little Ice Age.  Many villages in the French, Swiss, and Italian Alps saw their homes threatened and fields destroyed by these large ice masses.

Pleas went out to local bishops and even the Pope in Rome to come and pray in front of these glaciers in the hope of stopping their unrelenting advance.  Around 1850, the climate returned to more “normal” temperatures and the glaciers began to recede.  But then between 1940 and 1980, as the temperatures declined again, most of the glaciers halted their retreat and began to expand again, until warmer weather at the end of the last century caused them to continue the retreat they started 150 years earlier.

Furthermore, we now know that many of the glaciers around the world did not exist 4000 to 6000 years ago.  As a case in point, there is a glacier to the far north of Greenland above the large ice sheet covering most of the island called the Hans Tausen Glacier.  It is 50 miles long ,30 miles wide and up to 1000 feet thick.  A Scandinavian research team bored ice cores all the way to the bottom and discovered that 4000 years ago this glacier did not exist.

It was so warm 4000 years ago that many of the glaciers around the world didn’t exist but have returned because of the onset of colder weather.  Today’s temperatures are much lower than those that were predominant during the Holocene era as substantiated by studying the many cores that were dug from Greenland’s ice sheet.

10. “Data adjustment” is used to continue the perception of global warming:

For the first several years of my research I relied on the climate data banks of NASA and GISS, two of the most prestigious scientific bodies of our country.  After years of painstaking gathering of data, and relentless graphing of that data, I discovered that I was not looking at the originally gathered data, but data that had been “adjusted” for what was deemed “scientific reasons.”  Unadjusted data is simply not available from these data banks.

Fortunately I was able to find the original weather station data from over 7000 weather stations from around the world in the KNMI database.  (Royal Dutch Meteorological Institute).  There I was able to review both the adjusted and unadjusted data as well as the breakout of the daytime and nighttime data.  The results were astounding.

I found that data from many stations around the world had been systematically “adjusted” to make it seem that global warming was happening when, in fact, for many places around the world the opposite was true.  Following will be a few of the myriad of examples of this data adjustment.  When I present my material during presentations at local colleges, these are the charts that have some of the greatest impact in affecting the opinion of the students, especially when they realize that there is a concerted effort to misrepresent what is actually happening.

Another amazing result was that when only graphing the daily highs from around the country, a very different picture arises from the historical temperature data.

There are many more specific areas that I have researched and for which I have compiled data and presentation material, equally compelling regarding at exposing the fallacies of global warming.  A new twist has swept the global warming movement lately, especially since they had to admit that their own data showed that there was a “hiatus” on the warming, as illustrated in the 2014 IPCC report; their data showed an actual cooling over the last 10 years.

The new term: “climate change” is now taking over, such that unusual events of any kind, like the record snowfall in Boston, can be blamed on the burning of fossil fuels without offering any concrete scientific data as to how one could cause the other.

http://www.dailywire.com/news/2071/most-comprehensive-assault-global-warming-ever-mike-van-biezen