Govt Minister Admits Covid ‘Vaccines’ Did Not Prevent Transmission
Dan Hannan has posted on his YouTube under the heading ‘The vaccination scandal‘ a clip of him asking the Minister, Lord Markham, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary for Health, what the Government’s latest assessment is of the efficacy of the Covid vaccines
In response, the Minister admits that the vaccines did not significantly prevent transmission, leading Lord Hannan to comment beneath the clip:
“So why the hell did we force them on to young people? Why did we insist on vaccine passports?”
Here’s the question and reply in full:
My Lords, may I ask my noble friend the Minister about the efficacy of the vaccine in preventing transmission. It does seem to have been very good at keeping people out of hospital and keeping people alive.
But we built the most immense edifice of restrictions around the idea that it was preventing the transmission of Covid.
We had vaccine passports and travel bass and it now seems that both the WHO and FISA knew at the time that its efficacy when it came to preventing transmission was negligible.
Can my noble friend the Minister tell the House what is his Department’s latest assessment of the vaccine as a way of preventing giving other people Covid.
Lord Markham’s reply:
I think the main thing that the vaccine did was prevent, if you did get Covid, you having any bad effects from it all. So whilst it might not particularly reduce the transmission, it absolutely reduced the effects if you had it and the impact in terms of hospitalisations and deaths.
That was the main benefit of the vaccine. And because we made it basically a less serious disease, that then enabled us to open up the country in the way that we were one of the first to get going again because we knew there was no longer the high risk from the disease that there was before.
The vaccine “enabled us to open up the country” again. Yet Sweden and South Dakota never shut down, and Florida reopened before the vaccines were available. I guess they’re magical places that don’t need vaccines to live as free people.
Let’s not forget, of course, that Boris Johnson admitted that two doses of the vaccines didn’t protect against “catching the disease” or “passing it on” back in October 2021.
He also said the Government wanted “young people” and “kids at school” to be “getting their jabs with complete confidence”.
Of course, some scientists question whether the Covid vaccines were really any good at preventing serious illness or death either, but that’s for another day.
See more here Daily Sceptic
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Wisenox
| #
If they were on the side of the people, they would be protecting them from intellectual property rights claims over humans, telling them what is in the patents, giving them free fertility and DNA screening, and allowing them to sue in court based upon the willful disregard of EUA regulations.
Anything short of that is pure bullshit!
Reply
aaron
| #
so is anyone resigning or going to prison over the lies?
not holding my breath
Reply
Antonio
| #
Non possono fermare un virus, cioè qualcosa che non esiste….
Reply
Howdy
| #
The truth will be squeezed out, like juice from a lemon. None shall resist.
Reply
S.C.,
| #
“(The vaccine) made it basically a less serious disease, ”
I call bullshit! Where is the scientific research proving any one of the novel vaccines reduced symptoms? Give a specific example of a transparent scientific study drawing such conclusions.
I opted out of vaccination, never wore a mask nor complied with any lockdowns, and went where I wanted, when I wanted. I only complied, quite happily I must admit, with social distancing recommendations. Yet, somehow, I survived and never so much as caught the sniffles. When I told my wife my vaccine intentions and that she should make up her own mind, she researched it with no more input from me, then also opted out. (We are FL residents, so this was perfectly legal.)
Since late 2021, on my side of the family, there have been two pacemakers installed, one nearly fatal aortic dissection, and a diagnosis of lymphoma, wrecking the dreams of my 22 year old niece. My wife’s family has seen diagnoses of cancer, dementia(2), and arrythmia. All this in people who were perfectly healthy before vaccination, and all these medical issues have arisen post vaccination.
The bulk of evidence seems to point to the jab causing only great harm, and that this was no secret to those who pushed it.
It was tyranny and genocide and I believe this will be proven beyond a doubt one day soon.
I have had quite enough of the niceties and want answers.
Reply
Ken Hughes
| #
To claim that if you were “vaccinated” and got Covid, that you had it less seriously, is unscientific to say the least. It is stupid and bordering on insanity to persist in this claim. There is no scientific trial comparison of the seriousness of disease between the vaxxed and the un-vaxxed. To make this claim has no foundation in science or common sense. It is, frankly a dishonest, shabby, transparent attempt to avoid responsibility for the great Covid fuck up.
Reply
VOWG
| #
The severity of illness from the flu depends entirely upon a persons immune system. The covid shots messed up people’s immune systems and are still killing people. Time to stop the insanity no matter the cost or who gets hurt, stop the covid insanity.
Reply